Everyone Is Entitled To Their Position. by Dean Gotcher

Everyone Is Entitled To Their Position.
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

When you say "Everyone is entitled to their position," freedom of religion, i.e., freedom of the father's/Father's authority (freedom of private convictions, private property, and private business) prevails. When you say "Everyone is entitled to their opinion," freedom from religion, i.e., freedom from the father's/Father's authority (freedom from private convictions, private property, private business) prevails, negating freedom of religion, i.e., negating the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, so everyone can do wrong disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasure of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world stimulates with impunity, i.e., with everyone else's approval (affirmation), negating private convictions, private property, private business.

Sounding more like Karl Marx than Karl Marx himself, who was not yet born, Georg Hegel wrote (regarding everyone being entitled to their opinion, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life"):

"On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child, where there is no antithesis of person to person or of subject to object [no "top-down" order, i.e., no father's/Father's authority (position)], the surplus is not the property of one of them, since their indifference is not a formal or a legal one." (George Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

True freedom depends upon the freedom of everyone's position regarding right and wrong. While the person can be wrong in their position, there is an understanding of right and wrong which is established not from their carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world stimulates but from someone greater than their "self" and the world, who they are and the world is subject to. "Everyone is entitled to their opinion" conversely is freedom from position, i.e., i.e., freedom from religion, i.e., freedom from having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth—except that position, i.e., religion that says "Everyone is entitled to their opinion," negating freedom of religion, i.e., negating the father's/Father's authority. Only that religion, i.e., the position that "Everyone is entitled to their opinion," i.e., "entitled" to "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., "entitled" to that which is "of the world" only, prevails. In the "religion" of "Everyone is entitled to their opinion" there is no guilty conscience for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, there is only hatred toward those who get in the way, who, by insisting that "Everyone is entitled to their position," engender a guilty conscience (accountability to a "higher authority," i.e., the father's/Father's authority) for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates.

"What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." Romans 7:7

Dialogue, i.e., having to suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of your and the other person's "self interest," i.e., "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, in order (as in "new" world order) for you and the other person to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience that the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting," ties you and them to an opinion, making everyone "equal" according their "lust of the flesh," their "lust of the eyes," and their "pride of life," i.e., making them subject only to that which "is of the world." Discussion, on the other hand, i.e., having to suspend, as upon a cross your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating (having to suspend two "lusts," one for the pleasure of the flesh and eyes, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes," i.e., for "self" and the other for the pleasure that comes with affirmation from others, 'justifying' your "lust of the flesh," and "lust of the eyes," i.e., "'justifying' your self [your lusts] before men" which is "the pride of life"), in order (as in "old" world order) to hear and receive the truth, ties you to a "higher authority," making you subject to the father/Father, i.e., the father's/Father's "top-down," "right-wrong," "above-below" authority system that engenders a guilty conscience in you when you do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, i.e., when you "covet"—which makes you subject to those who would seduce, deceive, and manipulate you as one of Thorndike's chickens, Sinner's rats, and Pavlov's dogs in order to use you (as "human resource") for their own pleasure and gain.

"And through covetousness [your "self interests," i.e., your "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates] shall they with feigned words ["plastic words," Gr., i.e., doublespeak, i.e., saying one thing while meaning another, i.e., giving you what you want to hear in order to gain their trust thereby being able to move you down their pathway] make merchandise of you [turn you into "human resource" to be used for their own pleasure and gain—turning the children against their parent's authority, the citizens, including the "church," against Godly restraint, i.e., the father's/Father's authority so they can be bought and sold in the market place of man's carnal desires—tossing you (along with the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous) away (as some unwanted toy) without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders) when you no longer bring them pleasure or get in their way]." 2 Peter 2:3

While "Everyone is entitled to their position," there is only one position that is true, right (righteous), and holy—that of the Heavenly Father, His Son, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit, who's position is eternal. In fact all positions, apart from the Father's position are an opinion, i.e., are subject to the "lust of the flesh," the "lust of the eyes," and the "pride of life," i.e., are subject to that which "is of the world." At least in a discussion the person can hear and receive the truth, whereas in a dialogue he can not (there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, or in an opinion, or in the consensus process, there is only man's "self interest," i.e., his "lusting" after [his "coveting"] the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates)—he can only hear that which "is of the world" i.e., that which 'justifies' his "lust of the flesh," his "lust of the eyes," and his "pride of life." "Make me 'feel' 'good',' like God (only God is good) and I will listen to you." "Hurt my 'feelings,' i.e., tell me I am wrong or a sinner, i.e., not 'good,' i.e., not God and I will not (can not) hear a word you say." This is why the world has made discussion subject to only that which comes through dialogue ("lust") first, making all "discussions" subject to "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., to that which "is of the world" only. Apart from the Word of God, i.e., doing the Father's will, all man can do is make his opinion a position, making others subject to his opinion, i.e., to his "lust of the flesh," "lust of the eyes," and "pride of life" i.e., to his "self interest," i.e., to that which is "of the world" only, even if what he is doing is done in "the name of the Lord." When man's opinion of the Word of God (dialogue) becomes the means of communication within the "church," in order to know the truth (instead of the Word of God itself—accepting it as is, by faith and obeying it, i.e., doing the Father's will) the "church" has become apostate.

"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in many different ways, the object is 'change" (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11) (Engraved on Karl Marx's tombstone):

According to Karl Marx, everyone has their "position" on how the world 'ought' to be, making everyone else subject to their opinion, but the objective is dialogue itself, where everyone's opinion 'liberates' them from any position that gets in their way, i.e., in the way of their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, affectively negating the Father's authority.

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

In other words, according to Karl Marx "Lust reconciles you (the Karl Marx in you) to the world."

"Science is only genuine science when it proceeds from sense experience, in the two forms of sense perception and sensuous need, that is, only when it proceeds from Nature." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)

When "Everyone is entitled to their opinion," i.e., entitled to their "lust of the flesh," their "lust of the eyes," and their "pride of life," i.e., only that which "is of the world"—what Karl Marx called "sensuous needs," "sense perception," and "sense experience," i.e., "only that which is of Nature"—position, i.e., the Father's authority, i.e., doing the Father's will is negated.

"Sense experience must be the basis of all science." (ibid.)

"Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

Making "sense experience," i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., that which is only "of the world." the foundation from which to know the "truth," "behavior science" (the study of behavior as a "science") can only 'justify' "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., that which is only "of the world."

"Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family, the former must then itself be destroyed in theory and in practice." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

"The life which he [the child] has given to the object [to the parent and therefore, according to Marx, to God—when the child humbles, denies, dies to, disciplines, controls his "self" (stops dialoguing with his "self," i.e., stops "murmuring") in order to do the father's/Father's will] sets itself against him as an alien and hostile force [gets in the way of his carnal nature, i.e., his doing what he wants, when he wants, i.e., his "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, creating in him a guilty conscience when he does wrong, disobeys, sins, i.e., when he "lusts"—without the "murmuring," i.e., the "self" 'justification, i.e., the dialoguing, i.e., the making everything an opinion, the guilty conscience remains (for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting," i.e., for being "human")]." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)

Having rejected the Heavenly Father's authority outright, he could only surmise that the earthly father's authority was the source ('creation') of the Holy Father's authority, i.e., the nemesis to the freedom of everyone's opinion, who, only through killing the earthly fathers (the King and the bourgeoisie, i.e., those who support and propagate the father's/Father's authority system) and through dialogue, i.e., "self" 'justification' could 'liberate' their "self" from the father's/Father's authority system itself, not only in their thoughts but in their actions as well.

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now for) "self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

"Everyone is entitled to their opinion" negates "Everyone is entitled to their position." When "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion," man can direct his own steps, i.e., he can"lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience, i.e., he can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity (with everyone's approval, i.e., affirmation). "Everyone is entitled to their opinion" is the "Why?" the child screams at his parent(s) when he is told to do something he does not want to do or is told he can not do what he wants (thereby missing out on pleasure), wanting the parent(s) to go into dialogue with him—negating (abdicating) his position, i.e., his office of authority for the sake of initiating or sustaining "relationship" with the child, establishing "Everyone's opinion" over and therefore against his position, given to him by God. When opinion, i.e., "feelings," i.e., the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates reigns, position, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" is negated.

"Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11

The soul knows by being told. The flesh by "sense experience." While the father is not perfect, he may be a tyrant—using the office of authority give to him by God, in which to do His will, for his "self" instead, i.e., like a child, using it to satisfy his carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating—the office itself is perfect, giving the child a position in life (knowing right from wrong by being told), that he, when he hears God's position, might believe and inherit eternal life. By negating (rejecting) the hearing by being told (refusing to be told), i.e., rejecting the father's/Father's authority, all the child/man can do is "direct his steps" according to his carnal nature, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, which is being manipulated by those who are "of and for self," as pedophiles, pimps, and charlatans, seducing, deceiving, and manipulating him as "human resource" in order (as in "new" world order) to use him for their own pleasure and gain, i.e., for their own "lusts" and "praise," dying in his sins (with them).

"It is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." Jeremiah 10:23

"[E]very one of us shall give account of himself to God." Romans 14:12

Those who cry "Everyone is entitled to their opinion" force their position on everyone who says "Everyone is entitled to their position" so they can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience, with "Everyone's" affirmation. While "Everyone is entitled to their opinion" in this life, in the mind of those who want to 'justify' their "self," i.e., to 'justify' their sins, i.e., to 'justify' their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates (before one another), when it comes to judgment day their opinion will not count. On that day and for all eternity, temporal, i.e., "Everyone is entitled to their opinion" is gone (passed away) and only God's position, i.e., eternal death for those who love this world and eternal life for those who love the Lord and do the Father's will reigns. Only those who, in this life live according to God's position, i.e., by faith in Jesus Christ doing the Father's will, will inherit eternal life. In the end "Your opinion" and "Everyone else's opinion" does not count, only God's position counts.

"No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Matthew 6:24

"Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" Romans 6:16

"For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ." Galatians 1:10

"And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." 1 John 2:16

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6

"And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it. For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away? For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy angels." Luke 9:23-26

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12