"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths." Proverb. 3: 5-6
The Institution for Authority Research
About, Issues, Articles, Booklet, Schedule, Material, Scheduling, Audios, Radio, Sources, Textus Receptus, Class, Warnings, Thanks! P.S.
☛ Important Issue for all parents to read—whether homeschooling or not.
Homeschooling and the Dialectic Process. (pdf) Exam. (pdf)
What every parent should know about their child's classroom experience and reading material—how facilitators of 'change' design it in order to turn children into socialists/globalists.
Explaining how the dialectic process (self 'justification,' the consensus process) is being put into social action (praxis) in order to 'change' the way your children, your spouse, your relatives, your neighbors, your educators, your employer, your police and police chief, your representatives, judges, mayor, governor, and president, your minister, and even you feel, think, and act toward authority and relate with others, i.e., the world. "Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15
The praxis or social action of using Genesis 3:1-6—the dialectic process, i.e., self 'justification,' in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11—the father's/Father's authority system, in order to negate Romans 7:14-25—the guilty conscience for doing wrong (for sinning). By negating the deceitfulness and wickedness of man's heart and God's judgment upon him for his sins (in the feelings, thoughts, and actions of men, women, and children, i.e. in the relationship they have with themselves and with the world), the need for a savior (faith in the Son of God and obedience to His Heavenly Father) is negated (in the feelings, thoughts, and actions of men, women, and children, i.e. in the relationship they have with themselves and with the world). Despite all the "academics," this is what the dialectic process has always been about—man 'justifying' himself, i.e., 'justifying' his carnal desires in defiance to authority. No matter what 'liberals' might say (in denial), Socrates was found guilty of two things, corrupting the morals of the youth and destroying their respect for authority. The same is true for all philosophy, sociology, and psychology. The objective is not to attack religion or authority outright, but rather to 'change' the way that children think. "Help" the children to 'justify' "human nature," i.e., 'justify' their carnal desires of the 'moment' and faith in God will "wither away."
An Overview of the Dialectic Process (pdf), Endnotes (pdf)
Diaprax Exposed: Exposing the formula for 'change.' (pdf, dbl. sp.)note
Introduction to the Dialectic Process: how the dialectic process affects you.
By focusing upon the child's "feelings" of the 'moment,' by making the child's nature the ground of being, his desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' (his desire or "lust" for the pleasures of the 'moment' and his dissatisfaction toward restraint and the restrainer of them), i.e., philosophy, i.e., the child's opinion of the world (thinking about how the world "is," i.e., under parental and/or Godly restraint, and how it "ought" to be—subject to [tolerant of] his carnal desires of the 'moment') overshadows (supersedes) the authority of the parent (over the child) and God (over man,) making their commands, rules, facts, and truth "irrational" (impractical) and therefore their authority "irreverent" (of the past), thereby negating the "guilty conscience" in the child (the father's voice, i.e., his commands, rules, facts, and truth in the child) for doing wrong, i.e., for sinning, allowing the child to sin with impunity, allowing him to think and act (theory and practice) according to his perception of the "new" world order that he has created out of his own imagination, a "new" world order subject to his carnal nature, "of and for self" only over and therefore against the "old" world order which is subject to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., subject to his preaching of commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted and obeyed as given (by faith) and his teaching the children to humble, deny, control, and discipline themselves in order to do right and not wrong, despite their missing out on the pleasures of the 'moment' and having to endure pain, including the pain of missing out on the pleasures of the 'moment.'
"And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them. And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable." "As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:4-5, 12 "... and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall cause them to be put to death." Mark 13:12
George Hegel believed that "the child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once his feelings, thoughts, and actions and relationship with others is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority 'system']." (George Hegel, System of Ethical Life) According to this "logic" (dialectic 'reasoning'), all that is of the child, i.e., of his carnal nature negates all that is the father's, i.e., his children, his wife, his property, his business, and even his very own soul, making them all (including his children) subject to the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., to the psychologist, i.e., the psychoanalyst and the psychotherapist, etc., i.e., to the one(s) "helping" the children 'liberate' themselves out from under their father's authority. Hegel then wrote (sounding more like Karl Marx than Karl Marx himself): "On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child [thinking and acting according to their human (carnal) nature, that which is of the world only], where there is no antithesis of person to person or of subject to object [with no father's authority over the children (and no husbands authority over the wife) and no God's authority over man, all things begin "equal"], the surplus is not the property of one of them [there is no privilege of private, as in private property or business, i.e., no borders or sovereignty, i.e., no "Mine. Not yours." i.e., no "My wife. Not yours."; "My children. Not yours."; "My property. Not yours."; "My business. Not yours."—"My garden. Not yours."], since their indifference is not a formal or a legal one [since there is no one or no thing establishing one above the other (themselves above another]." ibid. There is a consequence to basing 'reality' upon the nature of the child and your desire for their approval, i.e., basing right and wrong upon the pleasures of the 'moment,' anyone (especially those with have the power of government in hand) who attains or desires to attain pleasure from your spouse, your children, your property, your business, or you has as much "right" to them (or you) as you do, i.e., you have not right to restrain them.
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine [Godly restraint]; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers [facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychotherapists], having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables [unto their own imaginations]." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4
"For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;" 2 Corinthians 10:3-6
"Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." Romans 1:21-32
I apologize for any links that do not work at this time. This year I converted over to a different format on my website. I had to re-link my files. While they should work I may have missed some. If there are any articles, issues, or audios you need to access which do not link, let me know and I will get to them ASAP. Website rankings drop because of broken links so any help would be appreciated. Accessing my website on a regular basis would help raise its ranking as well. Contact me at email@example.com. Thank You.
Institution for Authority Research Dean Gotcher 1997-2015