Wednesday, May 15, 2013
New: Issues; Common Core, Meetings being Scheduled; June 23 in Lincoln, Nebraska.
"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths." Proverb. 3: 5-6
The Institution for Authority Research
About, Issues, Articles, Schedule, Material, Scheduling, Audios, Radio, Archived, Textus Receptus, Class, Warnings, Thanks!
This website is for those who are being abused by the dialectical process and want to know what is happening and how to respond. Learn what Diaprax is and the 'purpose' for its use. The following information will answer the questions: What is 'driving' people to use it? and for what 'purpose' is it being used? You will learn how it works and what affect it is having on you and the world around you, including the effect it is having upon the church. "Church Growth," "Emergent church," and the "contemporary church" are based upon its use. You will also learn how you are to respond to it if you don't want to participate (see verses above). "A Brief Synopsis of the Dialectic Process," "Understanding our Father," "What dialectic 'reasoning' is all about," and "What is the dialectic process," are all "shorter" articles and issues which will explain the dialectic process and how it is being put into praxis, i.e. into socialist action to 'change' you and the world around you.
In a nutshell, the dialectic process (of George Hegel, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud fame, with all its philosophical terminology) is in actuality the use of Genesis 3:1-6 (the process of self 'justification,' where man is able to synthesize himself with the world only, i.e. making his own nature, i.e. his own "sense experience" the foundation from which to determine right and wrong, good and evil behavior, good being that of "human nature," evil being that which restrains it), negating the condition of Hebrews 12:5-11 (the Father's authority, with His commands to obey and His threat of chastening when they are not obeyed, i.e. which restrains "human nature," which initiates the condition of Romans 7:14-25, i.e. the condition of antithesis, i.e. the "guilty conscience' which sustains self-restraint, i.e. the recognizing, respecting, and defending of private property, i.e. "Dad's. Not mine," i.e. "Yours. Not mine," or "Someone else's. Not mine," thus 'justifying "Mine. Not yours," which inhibits or prevents social-ism, i.e. collectivism, i.e. "Ours. Not just yours"—which in actuality is "Ours. Not yours" when it comes to taking that which is of the Father). Therefore without negating the condition of Romans 7:14-25 (the condition of antithesis, i.e. the "guilty conscience") and the condition of Hebrews 12:5-11 (the Father's authority to teach the next generation responsibility and restraint, i.e. training them up in the admonition of the Lord, i.e. to do that which is right and not do that which is wrong, according to their Father's will) can not be negated and the condition of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e. man becoming synthesized with nature only, i.e. "God's tree is our tree," or as Karl Marx put it "The King's horse is the peoples horse" can not become a 'reality.' Dialectic 'reasoning' is thus the use of "human 'reasoning'" to 'justify' "human nature," i.e. 'liberating' or 'emancipating' the child, through his opinion, i.e. through how he "feels" and what he "thinks" in the 'moment,' from his Father's authority, so that he can be synthesizing with his carnal nature, so that he can be synthesized, though dialogue, (there is no Father's authority in dialogue) with the children of the world, all synthesized (united) as "one" upon that which they all have in common, i.e. their carnal nature. By making the child's opinion, i.e. his "feelings" and "thoughts," equal with his Father's commands, i.e. His right's and wrong's, His good and evil, the Father's authority is negated. in the thought and action of the children (in adult bodies, i.e. "the children of disobedience"). There is no Father's authority, i.e. no "Can not," no "Thou shalt not," no "It is written," no "Because I said so," and therefore no "guilty conscience," i.e. no condemnation, conviction, contrition, and therefore no need for repentance for disobeying the Father in a child's opinion, especially when it is in synthesis (consensus) with the children of the world.
The problem for those of dialectic 'reasoning' is, if the Father and His authority is accepted as the thesis (His position remaining in place, engendering discussion not dialogue regarding any disagreement or misunderstanding—Hebrews 12:5-11), then the child, under his Father's authority, i.e. accepting, serving, and stand up for it, must always live under a condition of antithesis, i.e. live having a "guilty conscience" for his disobedience, i.e. for being himself, i.e. for being carnal, i.e. for being a sinner, i.e. for being "normal" (Romans 7:14-25). Therefore, according to dialectic 'reasoning' the antithesis condition of the child, i.e. his being caught between his desires, i.e. following after his natural urges and impulses to relate with the world, and His Father's authority, restraining him from doing so, engenders a condition call "neurosis," "repressing" the child, "alienating" him, i.e. preventing him from becoming at-one-with himself and the rest of the world.
Dialectic 'reasoning' (Genesis 3:1-6) therefore must establish the child's carnal nature as thesis over and against the Father's authority (making any support of the Father's authority the cause of controversy and division), i.e. it must establish the sensuousness of man as thesis over and against the righteousness of God (making any proclamation of righteousness, i.e. commands and chastening which "represses" "human nature" and alienates" the "child" from the "children of the world," the cause of controversy and division), i.e. it must establish the "children of disobedience" as thesis, over and against the children of obedience (making the children of obedience the cause of controversy and division), i.e. it must establish the child's opinion, i.e. how he "feels" and what he "thinks" in the 'moment' as thesis over and against his "guilty conscience" (making his "guilty conscience" the cause of controversy and division), thereby 'justifying,' in the thoughts of the "children of disobedience," their praxis (their socialist action) of negating (destroying, annihilating) the Father and His authority, righteousness, and the children of obedience (taking all that is theirs away from them, including their family, their property, their business, their inalienable rights, under God, and even their very own lives), negating the "guilty conscience," having no "guilty conscience" while doing so, all for the sake of "humanity," i.e. all for the sake of "worldly peace and socialist harmony," i.e. all for the sake of "Making the world safe for Democracy," 'justifiable.' Whatever it takes to free the children from their Father's authority, whatever it takes to free man from God is 'justifiable,' i.e. "the end 'justifies' the means."
(Continued—repeating the dialectic pattern over and over again, adding information each time.)
My only concern is that I may be chasing people away by asking them to think (especially from the Word of God). It does not seem to be a popular thing to do these days (to think that is, especially from the Word of God, which is now considered as being "irrational" and therefore "irrelevant"), and it seems to be getting less popular every day that goes by (with everybody now "thinking" through their "feelings," which is not thinking but just responding to stimulation from the world, i.e. reacting to situations, i.e. "lusting" after dopamine, i.e. being only of the flesh, correlating the sensations of being "at peace with the world" as being of the spirit). I had hoped that people would grasp the subject and expose it in whatever venue it appeared, but it seems that most people are responding to the venue it appears in, without exposing it, having little if any effect.
You can tell you are in a dialectic world when the "conservatives," i.e. those who call themselves "Christians," are afraid of quoting God's word (running away from it as fast as they can go or 'changing' it to prevent controversy) for fear that no one will listen to them (for bringing "controversial," i.e. bringing "the people" under conviction, under tension or stress, engendering a condition of antithesis, i.e. hurting their "feelings" by exposing their sins before God, warning them of His wrath upon them for their sins that they might repent—making the Word of God, i.e. righteousness the standard to live by—now being correlated with being controversial, i.e. divisive, i.e. prejudiced, i.e. hateful, i.e. uncompassionate, i.e. uncaring, i.e. "irrational," and therefore as being "irrelevant," not worth listening to—when people have found "truth" within themselves, according to their own "human nature" and "human reasoning" they no longer seek for truth outside themselves, i.e. outside of "human nature" and "human reasoning"). It is why we are a nation of abomination today, where unrighteousness rules in the thoughts and the actions of men. A nation where abomination is encouraged and supported from the highest offices of the land is a nation who's leadership reflects the heart of its people, i.e. a people who love their carnal nature rather than the righteousness of the Lord God, and the Lord Jesus Christ. When the heart of the people (unrestrained by righteousness) rules, unrighteousness, i.e. anarchy, tyranny, and abomination rules.
If there has been one thing that has brought this nation to it's knees (not before the Lord—to whom someday every knee shall bow—but rather before "the prince of the power of the air"), it is its use of Bloom's "Taxonomies" (its use of the dialectic process) in the classroom. The use of the "Taxonomies," not having been publically exposed as works of abomination over these past sixty years—Bloom himself described them as opening up "Pandora's' Box," i.e. a box full of evils which once opened can not be closed—leads me to believe that God turned this nation over to its own demise some sixty years ago, the "Taxonomies" being the deathblow to the children of the parents of this nation (as well as to the children of the parents around the world), i.e. the children no longer fearing their parents authority and loving their words, because the parents of this nation no longer feared God and loved His Word (loving the opinions of men, i.e. their fleshy "lusts," i.e. the pleasures of this world instead). "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6
Isn't it "peculiar" that while under "the watchful eye" of those who say "We care about you," so many have died untimely deaths (including and especially the unborn and the elderly, i.e. the innocent and the helpless), all being done in the name of "progress" (with no "guilty conscience"). All being done in an effort to augment pleasure and attenuate pain (with no "guilty conscience"). All being done to make the world a "better" place to live in (with no "guilty conscience"). This is the result of man's use of dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e. 'justifying' his "human nature," his sensuousness over and against the righteousness of God, i.e. 'justifying' his carnal nature, the nature of the "child within" over and against the Father, i.e. His authority to restrain it. The dialectic idea being: Don't fight against the Father's authority, 'liberate' "the child within" instead, and the Father's authority will be negated. This is why we have become so selfish (barbarian). How selfish (barbarian) can we become? We are about to find out.
"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15 "Every one that is proud in heart is an abomination to the LORD: though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished." Proverbs 16:5
Just be forewarned, in a dialectic world, the more you know about the dialectic process (Genesis 3:1-6) and warn others of it's "downside" (dangers) the more you censor yourself from public interest (as well as engender attack from those who falsely accusing you to gain a following after themselves, as "gad flies" drawing people from the truth of God's Word to the "wisdom" of men, i.e. not pointing people to the Word of God for the answers but rather to themselves). "But and if ye suffer for righteousness' sake, happy are ye: and be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled; But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear: Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ. For it is better, if the will of God be so, that ye suffer for well doing, than for evil doing." 1 Peter 3:14-17 People, including your "friends" and family, loving a lie, won't want to talk to you any more, they won't even want you around. They like you as long as you stay "shallow," i.e. don't warn them about what is happening to them. The old adage "Ignorance is bliss" applies to all who are taken captive to dialectic 'reasoning.' It is why they give you that "deer in the headlights" look or treat you like you aren't in the room when you try to warn them about what is happening to them or is going to happen to them if they continue in "their way." Be wise regarding those (your "friends") who might "turn and rend you." "And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death." Matthew 10:21
In a dialectic world (the so called "new" world order, i.e. as "new" as Genesis 3:1-6) anyone preaching and teaching the truth is treated, not just as being "irrational," but also as being "irrelevant." As one news reporter told me (being honest for a moment when I asked him, i.e. a Baptist, if he would give Jesus an hour on TV) "We are not interested in the truth." In fact, preaching and teaching the truth, i.e. proclaiming God's judgment upon man's sin, by the light of God's Word, and calling men to repentance, in a dialectic world, you might end up like John the Baptist, in the king's palace.
History does repeat itself. For tyrants and tyranny to rule the truth must be censored. So, soon, websites like this will be censored (this website has already been censored by MacAfee—along with universities and colleges across the nation, denominational included, calling it "extremely offensive," blocking all access to it by their students—and attacked by those who have nothing better to do with their time than be "gadflies") to keep "peace" and "harmony" (worldly peace and socialist harmony), i.e. to make a name for themselves. I sent MacAfee an e-mail asking them why, but I don't expect a response, i.e. my being "irrational" and therefore "irrelevant" in their eyes. Communist China has computer cops to keep the people from knowing the truth. Evidently so do we.
I have talked to some who falsely attack me, revealing their foolish, narrow, and childish ways by accusing me of being of certain organizations because I do not mention or attack them (such as the illuminati, the masons, the Fabian society, the UN, etc. who are all of the same ilk, i.e. built upon the dialectic process, promoting its use around the world). By focusing upon such organizations, people get a following after themselves, moving people away from the gospel message (troubling their soul by getting them to focus on and worry about the things of the world, who I call "hand wringers," instead of upon Christ, who is our hope). I only seek to expose Satan's method (the dialectic process itself) so that anyone who wants to think can figure it out for themselves regarding such organization's, spending their time in the Word of God instead, serving the Lord, pointing people to Christ and not to themselves (trying to save the world from such organizations, i.e. making a name for themselves by doing so).
I suppose, according to them, Jesus missed the boat, and may himself have been a member of such organizations, by not having a list of Roman organizations to watch out for as well . Anyone who knows me knows their accusations are lies. Their actions reveal that they are of the flesh, relishing in the attention they get by drawing people after themselves and away from Christ. I would rather point people to the Word of God, the Lord God and the Lord Jesus Christ. The gospel message is not about removing such organizations to save the nation and the world. It is about the changing of man's heart, that the nation and the world would be changed ("turned the world upside down" Acts 17:6). The problem in this nation is not such organizations, it is man's heart. God is looking at your heart to determine what to do with this nation. I see Him removing His hand of protection from this nation, letting these organizations have their way because man's heart is upon making this world a "safe" place to live within according to his own carnal works and 'reasoning,' rather than trusting, following, and serving the Lord God and the Lord Jesus Christ alone, i.e. going wherever the Lord sends him, speaking whatever He tells him to speak.
Not that this website is that important, but rather the conveying of the importance of knowing God's Word and living as He directs is (as well as not being ignorant of Satan's devices, which this website exposes), encouraging believes in Christ to continue in Christ, enduring to the end, not being caught up with, i.e. taken captive to and condemned with those who praxis dialectic 'reasoning.'
"I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man." Galatians :6-11 emphasis added
If you have any questions regarding the dialectic process (Diaprax), how it is effecting you (and those around you) and how to respond to it, you can e-mail me at email@example.com. I won't respond to any argument engendering questions (dialectic 'reasoning,' "enlightened," socialist 'justifying' arguments).
About the Institution for Authority Research
Articles on Diaprax
Current Schedule (updated 03-10)
Books, DVD's, CD's & tapes
Arranging a Meeting or Conference (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Webcast Radio (New-Sunday, January 20)
Archived Radio programs
Why I continue to use a translation of the Textus Receptus, the KJV.
A class on Diaprax.
Shield of Faith Mission International:
September/October newsletter (.pdf) article. Read Dick York's article,
The Meaning of Missions, especially good, as always.
Pastor John E. Coleman radio show, Into the Word: http://www.johnecoleman.org/
© Institution for Authority Research Dean Gotcher 2011