Everyone Is Entitled To Their Opinion.
In other words: everyone is "entitled" to be and do wrong. You can tell you are talking to a Marxist when you tell someone they are wrong and they respond with "That is your opinion." In other words, as the first Marxist responded with "Ye shall not surely die" to the woman in the garden in Eden when she said "God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die" (by adding "touch" making it her opinion) he was telling her that that statement was God's opinion and not her opinions, and his opinion was not greater than her opinion, i.e., her opinion was equal with his, as she could see that all the trees were good for food, pleasing to the eyes, and this one was was able to make her wise (in her eyes), i.e., making her like (as) God, i.e,, "entitled" to her opinion as well. In the soviet system "everyone is entitled to their opinion," negating religious rights, i.e., the right to tell others they are wrong according to standards outside of human experience. When someone says to you "That is your opinion" when you tell them they are wrong, if you agree with them, i.e., if you consent you just "entitled" them, i.e., you just negate their being wrong in their thoughts and in their actions. When they are wrong, if you make their wrong an opinion, you are wrong, 'justifying' their being and doing wrong. The only reason people want you to "entitle" their wrong, calling it an opinion is so they can do wrong without having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, i.e., so they can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity, i.e., with your approval, i.e., with your affirmation. In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process there is no wrong except those who get in the way of the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process, insisting that "the group" is wrong. Since everyone is "entitled" to their opinion, "I feel" and "I think" become a fact, making facts and truth subjective, i.e., subject to everyone's carnal desires of the 'moment' that the world (the situation and/or the person) is stimulating, preventing "I know," i.e., facts and the truth from getting in the way.
The only reason someone tell you "Everyone is entitled to their opinion" or "That is your opinion" when you tell them they are wrong is to "prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space" so they can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world (the situation and/or person) is stimulating without having a guilty conscience—which being told they are wrong engenders. (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future)
The motto of the French Revolution, i.e., Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité, is simply Opinions (everyone is "entitled" to their opinion which 'Liberates' everyone from being told they are wrong), Dialogued (there is no "I am right and you are wrong" in dialogue, everyone is "Equal," i.e., "entitled" to their opinion), Consensus (everyone is One in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process, affirming their carnal nature, 'justifying' their negating anyone who tells them they are wrong, getting in their way). That is why Marxists will always say "That is your opinion" when you tell them they are wrong. Being wrong (accepting that they are wrong) would negate them, i.e., their Marxism.
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4
Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.
"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17
Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.
"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020