Making Immorality The Law Of The Land. by Dean Gotcher

Making Secularism And Immorality (Marxism) The Law Of The Land.
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

Karl Marx wrote: "Education as yet is unable and unwilling to bring all estates and distinctions into its circle. Only Christianity and morality are able to found universal kingdoms on earth." (Karl Marx, The Holy Family)

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

Immanuel Kant wrote of "lawfulness without law," where the child's carnal nature ("lawfulness," i.e., the law of the flesh) would rule the world without the father's/Father's restraints, i.e., the father's/Father's authority (the "law" of the parent/land/God) getting in the way, of "purposiveness without purpose," where the purpose of life would be to enjoy the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates, no longer having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline one's "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, no longer having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders) for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process, so everyone could do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity. (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment)

"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6

"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9

"Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11 While the earthly father and Heavenly Father differ in 'purpose,' i.e., the earthly father "chastening us after his own pleasure," the Heavenly Father "chastening us that we might partake in his holiness," they are both the same in structure or system, i.e., "top-down," "right-wrong," "above-below." Negate the father's/Father's authority system, starting with the earthly father, who we can all find fault with, and you negate the Heavenly Father's authority system in the process, something the Lord, while dividing the son from the earthly father, never did, keeping the father's/Father's authority system in place, with His Heavenly Father taking precedence over all authority, engendering individualism, under God (with no one, including your father being between you and Him).

Karl Marx wrote of negating the father's/Father's authority system—the Father's authority being the core of Christianity—so that man could be man (made in his own image, according to his carnal nature only) thinking and acting without the father's/Father's restraints. "Once the earthly family [with children having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [with the Son humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining his "self" in order to do the Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth], the former [the earthly father's authority, i.e., the system itself with children having to trust in (have faith in) and obey the father (their parents), their teacher, the laws of the land, etc.,] must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice [in the children's thoughts as well as in their actions—resulting in children no longer "fellowshipping" with one another based upon the father's/Father's (their parents/God's) commands, rules, facts, and truth but, through dialogue, "building relationship" with one another based upon their carnal nature, i.e., their carnal desires, i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment,' 'creating' a "new" world order of "lawfulness without law," i.e., "lawlessness" where the child's carnal nature rules without parental restraint]." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

Sigmund Freud wrote of children negating the father's/Father's authority ("collectively killing and devouring" the father) so they could be their "self" without having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting," having a "super-ego" which is subject to their "feelings" instead. "'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [the father no longer exercises his authority or has authority over his children in the home, forcing them to do right and not wrong according to his established commands, rules, facts, and truth that go against their nature, i.e., their carnal desires of the 'moment,' that the world stimulates]." "... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)

Georg Hegel recognized that only by starting with the child's carnal nature, making it the focus of attention (affirming it) could the father's/Father's authority be negated, i.e., could "worldly peace and socialist harmony" ("peace and affirmation") be initiated and sustained. "The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now, through dialogue, i.e., through "self " justification before others, i.e., through dialectic 'reasoning,' for) "self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

Karl Marx declared that it is only in pleasure, i.e., in the child's/man's natural desire to "enjoy" the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, i.e., in "lust" that he could come to know his "self" and the world as he and it "actually" is, making all that "is," "of and for self" and the world only. "To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

Karl Marx knew that without making the children's "sensuous needs," i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "sense perception," i.e., "the lust of the eyes," and "sense experience," i.e., "the pride of life" the foundation from which to know right from wrong, they would not being able to 'justify' their "self," i.e., their love of pleasure and hate of restraint before one another, 'liberating' their "self" from the father's/Father's authority so they could do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" without having a guilty conscience, i.e., so they could do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity. "Sense experience must be the basis of all science." "Science is only genuine science when it proceeds from sense experience, in the two forms of sense perception and sensuous need, that is, only when it proceeds from Nature." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)

"The philosophy of praxis [dialogue, i.e., "self" 'justification' before men, i.e., the affirmation of men] is the absolute secularization of thought, an absolute humanism of history." (Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks)

As was put into praxis in the garden in Eden, by the master facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the first psychotherapist, i.e., "behavioral scientist" the children's "feels" of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world have become the means by which children are 'liberated' from "Christianity and morality" today, in order (as in "new" world order) to become their "self," i.e., "of and for" their "self" and the world that brings them pleasure only instead, 'liberating' their "self" from the father's/Father's authority which gets in the way (of pleasure). "According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic, and demands activity according to the pleasure-principle." "To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit;" (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) "If the guilt accumulated in the civilized domination of man by man can ever be redeemed by freedom, then the 'original sin' must be committed again: 'We must again eat from the tree of knowledge in order to fall back into the state of innocence.'" (Marcuse, Eros and Civilization)

"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" "Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

All teachers are certified and schools accredited today based upon their use of "Blooms' Taxonomies" as their curriculum (method of teaching) in the classroom. This is curriculum which was developed by Marxists, two of which (Theodor Adorno and Erick Fromm) Benjamin Bloom noted were his "weltanschauung," i.e., world view. (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain). According to Bloom, his "taxonomies" are based upon "a psychological classification system." "Members of the taxonomy group spent considerable time in attempting to find a psychological theory which would provide a sound basis for ordering the categories of the taxonomy." (Benjamin Bloom, et al., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Book 1: Cognitive Domain) By making the students "feelings," i.e., their "affective domain," i.e., their love of ("lust" for) pleasure and their hate of restraint a part of the curriculum he automatically established an environment which would engender hostility in the students toward their parents, questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking their parents authority when they got home. "The affective domain is, in retrospect, a virtual 'Pandora's Box' [a "box" full of evils, which once opened, can not be closed].' It is in this 'box' that the most influential controls are to be found." "In fact, a large part of what we call "good teaching" is the teacher's ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the student's fixed beliefs and getting them to discuss issues." "Bloom's Taxonomies" are all about "ordering" "different kinds of affective behavior," i.e., "the range of emotion(s)" "organized into value systems and philosophies of life." The objective of "Bloom's Taxonomies" was and still is "to develop attitudes and values [in the children] which are not shaped by the parents." (Book 2: Affective Domain) Therefore, as in the garden in Eden, all that can result from the use of "Bloom's Taxonomies" in the classroom is hostility toward the parents from their children. Their participation in the "group grade," i.e., "How to you "feel?" and "What do you think?" classroom guarantees the outcome (the objective). When it comes to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth (that get in the way of their being able to enjoy the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating) "education" sides with the children's carnal nature, i.e., "lust," i.e., secularism and immorality over and therefore against the parent's authority, which is correlated, in theory, to true "Christianity," i.e., doing the Father's will and "morality," i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. In theory, 'change' the one, i.e., negate the earthly father's authority in the classroom, in the home, and in the world and the other is 'changed,' i.e., the Heavenly Father's authority is negated in the classroom, in the home, and in the world.

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (Book 2: Affective Domain)

If it worked in the garden it will work in the classroom, making secularism and immorality (Marxism) the law of the land. If you, as a parent abdicate your God given authority to train up your children to the school system using this curriculum, you have no one to blame but your self when your children turn on you, i.e., as Karl Marx, reject your authority as a parent when you tell them what they can and can not do.

"... the central problem is to change reality.… reality with its 'obedience to laws.'" "The dialectical method was overthrown—the parts [the children] were prevented from finding their definition within the whole [within "the group" because the children, instead of (through dialogue) 'discovering' common ground with one another based upon their common "self interests," i.e., their love of pleasure and hate of restraint, i.e., their carnal nature, held fast to their parent's standards ("obedience to laws") divided themselves between/from one another based upon who was right and who was wrong according to their parent's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, preventing 'change']." (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

"For to accept that solution [where all citizens, including parents, must participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., stop telling one another they are wrong—so they can build relationship with one another based upon "feelings," i.e., upon everyone's carnal desires, i.e., upon everyone's "self interest" of the 'moment'], even in theory, would be tantamount to observing society from a class standpoint [from the child's perspective, i.e., from the child's carnal nature] other than that of the bourgeoisie [from the parent's authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority]. And no class can do that-unless it is willing to abdicate its power freely [chose relationship with those who are wrong, where instead of telling them they are wrong, holding them accountable for doing wrong—correcting, reproving, chastening them when they do wrong, casting them out when they question, challenge, deny, disregard, attack right-wrong thinking, i.e., the father's/Father's authority—finding common ground with them instead, based upon common "self interests"]." (Lukács)

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory) It is in dialogue we discover our commonality with one another, i.e., our common "self interests" in each other, 'justifying' our "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., what which we have in common, i.e., that which is "of the world" only.

The "educator" does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school, if they were not doing that already (telling them would be "old school," maintaining the "old" world order of being told even if it was done for the 'purpose' of 'change,' i.e., for the 'purpose' of creating a "new" world order), all they have to do is use a curriculum in the classroom that "encourages," i.e., pressures the students to participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., into dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, 'justifying' their carnal nature over and therefore against their parents authority. Being told to be "positive" (supportive of the other students carnal nature) and not "negative" (judging them by their parents standards) pressures students to 'justify' their and the other students love of pleasure and hate of restrain, doing so in order to be approved, i.e., affirmed by "the group," resulting in "the group" labeling those students who, holding onto their parents standards, i.e., refusing to participate in the process of 'change' or fighting against it as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' resisters of 'change,' not "team players," lower order thinkers, in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictators, anti-social, etc., i.e., "hurting" peoples "feelings" resulting in "the group" rejecting them—the student's natural desire for approval and fear of rejection forces him to participate. Read the issue "Teacher Training" for a major overview of this process and the effect it is having upon you, your children, and this nation.

If the child's (your) heart is not regenerated (converted), it remains of the world only, just waiting for the Karl Marx in it to be 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority, negating your authority as a parent (God's authority as your/their creator) as a result.

"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth], and desperately wicked [hating the father's/Father's authority that "gets in the way," i.e. that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9 You can not see your "self interest," which includes your hate of restraint, as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure ("self interest"), getting in the way, blinds you to it. Like a drug, pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., "self interest" which the world stimulates blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness" which is being expressed toward those who are preventing (or trying to prevent) you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—making you not just wicked but "desperately wicked" in your effort to attain it, keep it, or get it back.

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15 "Self esteem," i.e., affirming and being affirmed by others, 'justifying' your (and their) carnal nature, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" is antithetical to humbling, denying ,dying to, controlling, disciplining your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., to doing the Father's will.

It is in your children dialoguing their opinions to a consensus in the "group grade," "open-ended, non-directed," "be positive, not negative," i.e., Marxist classroom they are being 'liberated' from your authority as a parent, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, according to their carnal nature, i.e., their love of pleasure and hate of restraint, doing to you what you do to God when you participate in dialoguing your opinion with others when it comes to doing right and not wrong according to His established commands, rules, facts, and truth, seeking their affirmation, i.e., 'justifying' your "self," i.e., your love of pleasure and hate of restraint before them instead. Even in the "church," when you or your minster, through dialogue add your opinion to the Word of God or your minster adds his opinion to the Word of God, making it subject to an opinion, it is no longer God's Word, i.e., God is no longer God—you have become God and your minister has becomes God, with him praising you and you praising him. This is why secularism and immorality reigns within the "church" today, with it turning to Karl Marx, i.e., men's opinions instead of the Word of God, rejecting true "Christianity and morality," i.e., refusing to accept the Word of God as "Is," i.e., rejecting "I AM." Instead of humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to God's Word, i.e., according to His established commands, rules, facts, and truth, "Christians" are turning to psychologists instead, 'justifying' (affirming) their "self," i.e., their carnal nature before men, making their "self" ("immorality") the standard for good and evil, through dialogue making God and His Word subject to them, i.e., to their opinion, i.e., to their "feelings," i.e., to their carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., to their "self interest," i.e., to their "lusts" of the 'moment,' i.e., to their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the moment' which the world stimulates, which includes the affirmation of men.

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12