Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité.
Opinions 'liberate' all from the father's/Father's authority (Liberté). Dialogue makes all equal according to the child's carnal nature, i.e., love of pleasure and hate of restraint (Égalité). Consensus makes all one in outcome (Fraternité). There is no father's/Father's authority, only the child's carnal nature in opinions being dialogued to a consensus, i.e., in liberté, égalité, fraternité. Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité is the motto of the French Revolution, which is being put into praxis in the "group grade," "group psychotherapy," facilitated,' Transformational Marxist, soviet, brainwashing, "safe zone/space/place," "positive" classroom today. "There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain) The "educator" does not have to tell the children/students to challenge, question, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home, after the "group grade" (liberté, égalité, fraternité) class, they, having affirmed each others love of pleasure and hate of restraint will do it automatically.
"For the dialectical method the central problem is to change reality.… reality with its 'obedience to laws'." (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)
If, according to dialectic 'reasoning, the father's/Father's authority engenders Nationalism, individualism, parochialism, local control, i.e., "rule of law" under God. Globalism can not become a reality without the negation of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., negation of the traditional home with parents in authority, i.e., negation of the "middle class"—which tends to initiate and sustain the father's/Father's authority. The parent's and the traditional educator's authority is based upon their 1) preaching commands and rules to their children/students, to be obeyed (as given), teaching facts and truth to be accepted as is (by faith), and discussing (at their discretion) any question(s) the children might have on how best to do what they are being told to do (providing the parent/teacher has time, the child/student can understand, and the child/student is not questioning or challenging the parent's/teacher's authority), 2) rewarding or blessing the child who obeys and does things right, 3) chastening or not rewarding the child who does wrong or disobeys, and 4) casting out or rejecting any child who questions, challenges, defies, disregards, or attacks their authority, which engenders a guilty conscience in the child/student when they do wrong, disobey, sin. This is the pattern, system, paradigm, i.e., way of thinking and acting of Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, resulting in Romans 7:14-25, i.e., the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning which those who praxis dialectic 'reasoning,'i.e., "self" 'justification, i.e., Genesis 3:1-6 , i.e., 'liberal's,' socialists, etc., seek to negate. Rather than killing the fathers (and those who support them) outright, as was done in the French, Russian, Chinese, etc., revolutions, this method or formula (dialoguing opinions to a consensus) negates the father's/Father's authority in the thoughts and actions of the participants, i.e., the children/students, the workers, the government leaders, the ministers, and the parents instead.
"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence [overcoming the effect of the father's/Father's authority in their lives]." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)
Karl Marx wrote: "Once the earthly family [where the children have to humble, deny, die to their "self" in order to do the father's will] is discovered to be the secret of the holy family [where the Son humbled, denied, died to his "self" in order to the Father's will, calling all who follow him to do the same], the former [the traditional family system with its father's authority (engendering prejudice and a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning)] must itself be annihilated [vernichtet] theoretically [in the "thoughts" of the child] and practically [in accordance to (in agreement with) the law of the flesh—what all children have in common—which is the basis of common-ism]." (Karl Marx, Theses On Feuerbach #4)
Sigmund Freud wrote: "'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [in other words, the father no longer exercises his authority in the home]." According to Freud, incest and patricide are part of the child's deepest nature and must be expressed ('liberated') if he is to come to know himself as he is, i.e., of the world only: "... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother—culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Sigmund Freud as quoted in Herbart Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud)
"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16
According to dialectic 'reasoning,' it is in, i.e., from the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's love of "self," i.e., the child's natural love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation), which the world stimulates, and hate of restraint ("transcending" the father's/Father's authority) that "worldly peace and socialist harmony," i.e., globalism resides, i.e., is initiated ('created') and sustained, i.e., is "actualized," i.e., is made 'reality' in the thoughts and actions ("theory and practice") of the next generation of citizens.
"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')
"The life [authority] which he [the child] has given to the object [to the parent, to the teacher, to the boss, to the ruler, or to God—when the child humbles, denies, dies to, disciplines, controls his "self" in order to do their will, thus "empowering" them] sets itself against him as an alien and hostile force." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3) Only by 'liberating' the child from "the fear of God," i.e., from the father's/Father's authority (which the child "created" by having faith in and obeying the father/Father in the first place) can the child be "of and for self" and the world only.
Abraham Maslow wrote: "Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [their parent's, i.e., their father's/Father's way of thinking and acting]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature) "Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions [where children are 'liberated' from their parent's, i.e., the father's/Father's authority so they can be carnal, i.e., "of and for self" and the world only] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [where children must humble, deny, die to their "self" in order to do their parent's, i.e., the father's/Father's will] stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "Only a world government with world-shared values could be trusted or permitted to take such powers. If only for such a reason a world government is necessary. It too would have to evolve. I suppose it would be weak or lousy or even corrupt at first―it certainly doesn't amount to much now & won't until sovereignty is given up little by little by 'nations.'" "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World, at least so far as the guiding goal is concerned. To get to that goal is politics & is in time and space & will take a long time & cost much blood." ". . . A caretaker government could immediately start training for democracy & self-government & give it little by little, as deserved." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" "Nakedness is absolutely right. So is the attack on antieroticism, the Christian & Jewish foundations." "I must put as much of this as is possible & usable in my education book, & more & more in succeeding writings." (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow) This is why Maslow could write: "I have found whenever I ran across authoritarian students [those who honor their parent's, i.e., the father's/Father's authority] that the best thing for me to do was to break their backs immediately." "The correct thing to do with authoritarians is to take them realistically for the bastards they are and then behave toward them as if they were bastards." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)
Carl Rogers wrote: "Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" "Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
The praxis of dialoging opinions to a consensus in the classroom (OBE, "No child left behind," CORE, etc.), in the workplace (TQM, TQL, COPS, etc.), in government (STW, "bipartisanship"), in the "church" (Church Growth, Emergent Church, etc.) initiates and sustains liberté, égalité, fraternité, negating the father's/Father's authority, and the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, in the home, in the workplace, in government, and even in the "church," so that all can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity, i.e., do what Georg Hegel, Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud preached and taught. Once anyone who believes in their theory, i.e., opinion, i.e., ideology gets into a position of power, i.e., "authority," whether it be in the classroom, workplace, government, or "church" they force it down everyone's throat, labeling anyone who questions, challenges, defies, exposes, and/or attacks it as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, prejudiced, a "lower-order-thinker," maladjusted, not a "team builder," "psychological," mentally ill, "in denial," a sociopath, a Fascist, a Nazi, a racist, neurotic, phobic, unreasonable, irrational, irrelevant, etc., needing to be either converted, silenced, or removed for the sake of "the people," i.e., for the sake of the one(s) in "authority."
"Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15
"Every one that is proud in heart is an abomination to the LORD: though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished. By mercy and truth iniquity is purged: and by the fear of the LORD men depart from evil." Proverbs 16:5-6
"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4
As you can see, by the laws that have been past over the past few decades and continue to be passed—even in the "church"—abomination (liberté, égalité, fraternité) is now the law of the land. When you focus upon the children, over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, seducers, deceives, and manipulators of men, women, and children, as pimps and pedophiles, rule over the land, oppressing the people.
"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' themselves, i.e., their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the carnal pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2018, 2019