The "Old" World Over Vs. The "New."
"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16
"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15
The "old" word order is based upon the father's/Father's authority, requiring the child to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate his self in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will. The father's/Father's authority (the Patriarchal paradigm) is based upon the 1) preaching of established commands and rules to be obeyed as given, the teaching of established facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, and the discussing of any question(s) the children might have regarding the commands, rules, facts, and truth being taught, at the father's/Father's discretion, i.e., providing he/He deems it necessary, has time, the children are able to understand, and are not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking his/His authority, 2) rewarding the children who do right and obey, 3) correcting and/or chastening the child who does wrong and/or disobeys, that he might learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Fathers' will, and 4) casting out (expelling/grounding) any child who questions, challenges, defies, disregards, attacks the father's/Father's authority. While the "earthly father," i.e., dad is not perfect, he may be (or may have been) a down right tyrant (or MIA/AWL) his office of authority is perfect, having been given to him by God (the "Heavenly Father"), who is perfect, in which to do His will. The role of the father, besides providing food, clothing, safety, and a roof over his families head is to train up his children in the admonition of the Lord—doing the Father's will—and teach them how to "pull weeds," i.e., work (get off their duff, expecting someone to wait on them).
"And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11
"Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth." Ephesians 6:1-3
The old world order is also based upon the guilty conscience which the father's/Father's authority engenders for not doing right, i.e., for not humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining, capitulating one's self in order to do the father's/Father's will, for doing wrong instead, i.e., for disobeying, sinning, i.e., lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating.
"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves:'" (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) The "guilty conscience" as viewed (explained) by a Marxist.
"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing)
The gospel message is likewise based upon the Father's authority, with the Son (and those following Him) doing the Father's will.
"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50
"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50
"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21
"Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;" 2 Corinthians 10:5
"And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men; Knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the inheritance; for ye serve the Lord Jesus Christ." Colossians 3:23-24
"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself [flee his lusts], and take up his cross [endure the rejection of men for not affirming their lusts], and follow me [doing the Father's will]. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works." Matthew 16:24-27
"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty." 2 Corinthians 6:14-18
"[T]he friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." James 4:4
"And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." 1 John 2:18
"... and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:3
All authority comes from God, therefore the "earthly father" along with his wife and children are accountable to the "Heavenly Father."
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9
"He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son." 1 John 2:22
Limited, representative government, and unalienable right's (rights no man can put a lean on) are based upon the father's/Father's authority, with the father/Father engendering a guilty conscience (accountability for one's actions) in the children (in the next generation of citizens) for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating (instead of doing the father's/Father's will)—the child (as a representative) is sent to the store (to the capital) to re-present the father's, i.e., the constituent's position (rights and wrongs), i.e., to purchase the father's, i.e., the constituent's goods. He is replaced (no longer sent to the store) if he compromises the father's/Father's standards (replaces representation with mediation), i.e., spends the father's money on his self, i.e., to satisfy his own self interests, i.e., lusts. Unlike any other government on earth, America made the father of the home the King, limiting government to the vote of the citizens (majority vote), i.e., to the father, establish law upon the authority of the father in the home, i.e., "rule of law," retaining the right of private convictions (freedom of the conscience, religion, speech), private property, private business. You can not get any more local than the home. Local begins in the home, i.e., is initiated and sustained by the father's/Father's authority in the home, engendering individualism (under God) in the next generation of citizens—knowing right from wrong (by being told), having a guilty conscience (being held accountable) for doing wrong.
"Despotism ... predominates in the human heart." "If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation [by those in one branch of government establishing their authority over another, making it subject to them, i.e., to their self interests, i.e., to their lusts]; for, though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed." (George Washington, Farewell Address)
Limited, representative government was established because of the "human heart," i.e., man's (the child's) natural inclination to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating instead of doing right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., instead of doing the father's/Father's will.
"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9
Your heart is "deceitful ("deceitful above all things") thinking pleasure, i.e., "lust" (dopamine emancipation) is the 'purpose' of life instead of doing the father's/Father's will, making you wicked ("desperately wicked") in your effort to negate the father's/Father's authority that gets in your way. You can not see your heart as being wicked because your "lust" for pleasure (your "lust" for "lust") is standing in the way. The lusts of Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, et. al. is in your heart, waiting for you to 'justify' it, i.e., your "self," i.e., your lusts, i.e., them over and therefore against having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate your "self" in order (as in the "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, so you can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., so you can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, in order (as in "new" world order) for you to become "self actualized," i.e., like them.
"The peasantry [the traditional family with the father in authority] constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie [the father's/Father's authority system]—in positively every sphere of activity and life." "We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs, and traditions [the father's/Father's authority] everywhere." (Vladimir Lenin, Left-Wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder An Essential Condition of the Bolsheviks' Success May 12, 1920) Millions died violent deaths because of this dictate—including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous—as always happens in any country it is applied.
Limited, representative government has been replaced with the self interests of the child(ren), i.e., the "representative," who's interest is on his self, i.e., his lusts—who perceive his self as being the personification of "the people" (since they lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates just like him—the bases of socialism/common-ism), making lust, i.e., his self interest his platform instead of doing right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's (the constituent's) established commands, rules, facts, and truth, thereby negating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "rule of law" (limited, representative, constitutional government) as the law of the land.
"... the central problem is to change reality.… reality with its 'obedience to laws.'" (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)
"Lawfulness without law." (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment) Where the law of the flesh (lust) rules without the law of the father'/Father (the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders) getting in the way. The child's carnal nature is then no longer viewed as being above the law (breaking the law, retaining the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for lusting ....). It is the law (there is no law but it, i.e., lust).
If you reject the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "rule of law," "lust" ("covetousness") will swallow you up, i.e., "lust" ("covetousness") will make you a servant to it. Being intoxicated with, addicted to, and possessed by it, chasing after it you will sacrifice all you have for it, including your soul.
"I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." Romans 7:7
By making lust, i.e., the child's carnal nature, i.e., "human nature" the law of the land, despots (facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychotherapists) now rule over "the people."
"If we have the power or authority to establish the necessary conditions, the predicted behaviors [our potential ability to influence or control the behavior of groups] will follow." "We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalizing them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood." "We know how to change the opinions of an individual in a selected direction, without his ever becoming aware of the stimuli which changed his opinion." "We know how to influence the ... behavior of individuals by setting up conditions which provide satisfaction for needs of which they are unconscious, but which we have been able to determine." We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do." "By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behavior—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
"And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." 2 Peter 2:3 Gaining access to your lusts, i.e., to your self interests , i.e., to what you covet (through the use of dialogue) you are turned into "human resource" to be used (by those in power) to satisfy their carnal desires, i.e., their lusts of the 'moment'—tossing you aside when you no longer bring them pleasure, cost them time and/or money, and/or get in their way—as you did the father/Father who got in your way.
"Their tongue is as an arrow shot out; it speaketh deceit: one speaketh peaceably to his neighbour with his mouth, but in heart he layeth his wait." Jeremiah 9:8
The "new" world order perceives the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "rule of law" as being "the problem"—getting in the way of "human nature," i.e., preventing the child (the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the psychotherapist) from satisfying his carnal desires (lusts) of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating.
"Authoritarian submission [humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining, capitulating "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] was conceived of as a very general attitude that would be evoked in relation to a variety of authority figures—parents, older people, leaders, supernatural power, and so forth." "God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority." "Submission to authority, desire for a strong leader, subservience of the individual to the state [parental authority, local control, Nationalism], and so forth, have so frequently and, as it seems to us, correctly, been set forth as important aspects of the Nazi creed that a search for correlates of prejudice had naturally to take these attitudes into account." "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)
"The problem," according to those of the "new" world order is that the father's/Father's authority divides "the people" based upon who is doing right, i.e., who is humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining, capitulating his self in order to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., who is obeying the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth and who is doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., who is lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating (establishing his self, i.e., his lusts, i.e., his self interests over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority). In the new world order it is lust, i.e., what all mankind has in common (the bases of common-ism) that "reconciles" man to the world, requiring the negation of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "repression" (not being able to do his will, i.e., satisfy his lusts of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating), "alienation" (not being able to relate with others, lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating), "neurosis" (having a guilty conscience for lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating), etc., in order for man to become his self, i.e., self-actualized (being able to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating without having a guilty conscience). While the old world order divides upon who is doing right and who is doing wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth the new world order divides upon who is doing right according to "human nature," i.e., who is affirming ('justifying') the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's natural inclination to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., that the current situation and/or people are stimulating and who is doing wrong, i.e., who is inhibiting or blocking, i.e., restraining the child, i.e., preventing the child (the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the psychotherapist, i.e., the "Transformational" Marxist) from becoming his self, i.e., self-actualized.
"No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Matthew 6:24
"Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" Romans 6:16
"For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ." Galatians 1:10
"... seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6
"Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others." Ephesians 2:2,3
"And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them. And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable." "As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:4-5, 12
"Rejoice, O young man, in thy youth; and let thy heart cheer thee in the days of thy youth, and walk in the ways of thine heart, and in the sight of thine eyes: but know thou, that for all these things God will bring thee into judgment." Ecclesiastes 11:9
Both Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud were united in their lust for pleasure, i.e., in the child's carnal nature.
"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')
"Self-perfection of the human individual is fulfilled in union with the world in pleasure." "According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic." "Eros is fundamentally a desire for union with objects in the world." "Eros is the foundation of morality." "The foundation on which the man of the future will be built is already there, in the repressed unconscious [in the carnal nature of the child]; the foundation has to be recovered [the child has to be 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority]." (Brown)
"In a democratic society a patriarchal culture should make us depressed instead of glad; it [a patriarchal culture, i.e., the father's/Father's authority] is an argument against the higher possibilities of human nature, of self actualization." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)
"Human consciousness can be liberated from the parental complex [the father's/Father's authority system] only be being liberated from its cultural derivatives, the paternalistic state and the patriarchal God." (Brown)
"The family is one of these social forms which ... cannot be changed without change in the total social framework." (Max Horkheimer, Kritische Theori)
"I have found whenever I ran across authoritarian students that the best thing for me to do was to break their backs immediately." "The correct thing to do with authoritarians is to take them realistically for the bastards they are and then behave toward them as if they were bastards." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow On Management) Welcome to the contemporary college (grade school, high school, etc.,) classroom environment.
"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [their parent's/God's authority aka the father's/Father's authority system]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species ["humanists," i.e., Marxists] first and foremost." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)
"Marxian theory needs Freudian-type instinct theory to round it out. And of course, vice versa." "Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions ['liberation' of "self" from the father's/Father's authority] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [submission of "self" to the father's/Father's authority] stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)
Both Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud were united in their hatred toward the father's/Father's authority.
"Once the earthly family [where children have to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate their self in order to do the father's will] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [where the son of God, Jesus Christ humbled, denied, died to, controlled, disciplined, capitulated his self in order to do the Father's will], the former must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice [in the children's thoughts, directly effecting their actions, i.e., their behavior toward their self, others, the world, and authority]." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)
"... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud) Sigmund Freud's history of the prodigal son is not of the son coming to his senses, humbling his self, returning home, submitting his self to his father's authority, learning his inheritance was not his father's money but his father's love for him, but of the son joining with his "friends," returning home, killing the father, taking all that was his (the father's), using it to satisfy their carnal desires, i.e., their lusts of the 'moment' that the world stimulates.
"... and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall cause them to be put to death." Mark 13:12
"The Communist Manifesto makes the point that the bourgeoisie [the traditional, "middle-class" family, requiring those under authority (their children) to honor the father's/Father's authority] produces its own grave-diggers [children, dissatisfied with their parent's authority, i.e., 'justifying' their "self" (their lusts) before one another, killing their parents (at least not caring what happens to them) without having a guilty conscience].'" (Lukács)
By focusing upon the children, i.e., the family, i.e., "the group," i.e., relationship, i.e., feelings the father's/Father's authority is negated in the thoughts of the children, directly effecting ('justifying') their actions.
"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), "of and for self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)
The new world order is based upon the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's (the facilitator of 'change's,' i.e., the psychotherapist's) natural inclination to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., that the current situation and/or people are stimulating, hating restraint, i.e., hating the father's/Father's authority for getting in the way, with the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the psychotherapist—'justifying' the child's (his) carnal nature, i.e., the child's (his) natural inclination to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., that the current situation and/or people are stimulating, hating restraint, i.e., hating the father's/Father's authority for getting in the way—with the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the psychotherapist taking the father's/Father's place (as "big brother"—in his mind not being held accountable for what he does, i.e., what happens to his siblings who get in his way, i.e., "Am I my brother's keeper?" [Cane killed Abel because Abel did the Father's will, which Cane did not want to do, wanting to do his will instead, i.e., the father's/Father's authority (and Abel abiding by it) getting in his way (to the pride of life).]).
"Change in methods of leadership is probably the quickest way to bring about a change in the cultural atmosphere of a group." "Any real change of the culture of a group is, therefore, interwoven with the changes of the power constellation within the group." (Barker, Dembo, & Lewin, "frustration and regression: an experiment with young children" in Child Behavior and Development)
"It is usually easier to change individuals formed into a group than to change any one of them separately." "The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to the group." (Kurt Lewin in Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change) You are more apt to compromise in a group setting than one-on-one with an individual.
"The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." (Kurt Lewin in Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education) In the traditional classroom the father's/Father's authority is retained, with the teacher 1) preaching established commands and rules to be obeyed as given, teaching established facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, and discussing any question(s) the students might have ... (see above) while in the transformational classroom the "teacher," acting as a facilitator of 'change' encourages (pressures) the students, in a "group grade" setting (requiring the children to work as a "team" to solve a personal-social issue) to dialogue their opinions to a consensus, negating the right of any student to retain the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., the "old" world order in the classroom. The traditional minded student, who refuses to be converted, i.e., who resists is going to be silenced, censored, and martyred in a dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, facilitated classroom.
"It is not individualism [doing the father's/Father's will] that fulfills the individual [that satisfies his lusts], on the contrary it destroys him [it prevents him from becoming his self, i.e., from satisfying his lusts, i.e., from fulfilling his self interests]. Society [compromise in order to "get things done" in the group] is the necessary framework through which freedom [freedom from the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders] and individuality [freedom to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience, with affirmation, i.e., the groups approval] are made realities." (Karl Marx, in John Lewis, The Life and Teachings of Karl Marx)
"The individual is emancipated in the social group." "Freud commented that only through the solidarity of all the participants could the sense of guilt [the guilty conscience for disobeying the father/Father] be assuaged [negated]." (Brown)
"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child [the guilty conscience] thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin; A Dynamic Theory of Personality) If you can place the child in an environment void of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., not inhibiting or blocking him from lusting for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, i.e., not making him feel guilty for being his self, i.e., an "open-ended - non-directed," i.e., "be positive, not negative" environment the guilty conscience "disappears," i.e., is negated.
In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus environment (there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process, there is only the participant's carnal desires, i.e., lusts, i.e., self interest of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating) the father's/Father's authority is negated, i.e., is replaced with the carnal nature of the child, i.e., the child's natural inclination to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., that the current situation and/or people are stimulating, hating restraint, i.e., hating the father's/Father's authority for getting in the way, with the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the group psychotherapist leading the way.
"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" "Experience [lust for pleasure, including the pleasure which comes with "the group's" approval (affirmation), 'justifying hatred toward restraint, i.e., hatred toward the father's/Father's authority] is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
" Sense experience must be the basis of all science." "Science is only genuine science when it proceeds from sense experience, in the two forms of sense perception and sensuous need, that is, only when it proceeds from Nature." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)
Since, according to Karl Marx, et al. all that is "actual" is only "of the world," i.e., "only... proceeds from Nature," only that which man can "sense," i.e., "sense experience," i.e., only "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," what Karl Marx called (redefined as) "sensuous need," "sense perception," and "sense experience" is real or "actual," requiring the negation of that which is not "from Nature," i.e., not "of the world," i.e., not real or "actual," i.e., the father's/Father's authority so man can (Karl Marx, et al. could) "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the world without having a guilty conscience, with affirmation, i.e., with impunity. The whole focus of Communism, i.e., Marxism is upon negating\the father's/Father's authority in the individuals thoughts and actions, so the individual and all of society can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" without having a guilty conscience, i.e., with everyone's approval, i.e., affirmation. "Behavior 'science'" can only 'justify' the carnal nature of the child, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," 'justifying' the negation of the father's/Father's authority that gets in the way.
"Without exception, [children] enter group therapy [the "group grade" classroom] with the history of a highly unsatisfactory experience in their first and most important group—their primary family [the traditional home with parents telling them what they can and can not do]." "What better way to help [the child] recapture the past than to allow him to re-experience and reenact ancient feelings [resentment, hostility] toward parents in his current relationship to the therapist [the facilitator of 'change]? The [facilitator of 'change'] is the living personification of all parental images [takes the place of the parent]. Group [facilitators] refuse to fill the traditional authority role: they do not lead in the ordinary manner, they do not provide answers and solutions [teach right from wrong from established commands, rules, facts, and truth], they urge the group [the children] to explore and to employ its own resources [to dialogue their "feelings," i.e., their desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' in the "light" of the current situation, i.e., their desire for "the group" approval (affirmation)]. The group [children] must feel free to confront the [the facilitator of 'change'], who must not only permit, but encourage, such confrontation [rebellion and anarchy]. He [the child] reenacts early family scripts in the group and, if therapy [brainwashing—washing respect for and fear of the father's/Father's authority from the child's brain (thoughts) ] is successful, is able to experiment with new behavior, to break free from the locked family role [submitting to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will] he once occupied. … the patient [the child] changes the past by reconstituting it ['creating' a "new" world order from his "ought," i.e., a world "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., a world void of the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the current situation and/or people are stimulating]." (Irvin D. Yalom, The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy)
"Once the earthly family [with the earthly father in authority] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [with the Heavenly Father in authority], the former [the earthly father with his authority over the family] must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice [in the children's/people's thoughts and in their actions (their behavior) with one another]." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)
"There is no more important issue than the interrelationship of the group members." "To question the value or activities of the group, would be to thrust himself into a state of dissonance." "Few individuals, as Asch has shown, can maintain their objectivity in the face of apparent group unanimity." (Yalom)
"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child [the guilty conscience] thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult [the father's/Father's authority]." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence [guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating] also disappears." (Kurt Lewin; A Dynamic Theory of Personality)
"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself [one's inclination to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, hating restraint] in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)
Discussion retains the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the father/Father has the final say ("Because I said so," "Never the less," "It is written"), i.e., you KNOW because dad said so, i.e., you were told (the soul knows from being told, the flesh from "sense experience"). Dialogue, i.e., "I feel" and "I think," on the other hand 'liberates' the child from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., from having to be told (you know because you have experienced it for your self—if it inhibits or blocks pleasure, i.e., human nature, i.e., lust it is not from the world, i.e., it is not of and for you, i.e., it is to be rejected).
"In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) Discussion is formal, retaining the father's/Father's authority, i.e., accountability for being/doing wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. You KNOW because you have been told.
"A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) Dialogue is informal, 'liberating' the person from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., i.e., accountability for being/doing wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. You know because you have experience it for your self, developing common ground (identifying) with those who have experienced it as well.
Move communication away from discussion (which retains the father's/Father's authority) toward dialogue (which is based upon the child's carnal nature), when it comes to right and wrong behavior, i.e., doing right and not wrong and the father's/Father's authority is negated in the child's thoughts, directly effecting his actions.
"Prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future)
Since "the empty space," where we talk to (dialogue with) our self, 'justifying' our lust for pleasure and and our resentment (hatred) toward restraint (toward missing out on pleasure)—which the world stimulates—the father's/Father's authority ("someone who KNOWS") must be removed from the environment in order for the child to become "normal," i.e., "of and for self," i.e., of the world (Nature) only. When "science," i.e., stimulus-response, i.e., that which is only of the world becomes the basis for determining right and wrong behavior only "the lust of the flesh," i.e., "sensuous needs," "the lust of the eyes," i.e., "sense perception," and "the pride of life," i.e., "sense experience," can be 'justified,' 'justifying' the negation of the father's/Father's authority (parental authority), i.e., the removal of the father/Father from the child's learning environment (experience)
"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)
The following section is from Marxist curriculum by which all educators are certified and schools accredited today, called "Bloom's Taxonomies."
"To create effectively a new set of attitudes and values, the individual must undergo great reorganization of his personal beliefs and attitudes and he must be involved in an environment which in many ways is separated from the previous environment in which he was developed.... many of these changes are produced by association with peers who have less authoritarian points of view, as well as through the impact of a great many courses of study in which the authoritarian pattern is in some ways brought into question while more rational and nonauthoritarian behaviors are emphasized." "The effectiveness of this new set of environmental conditions is probably related to the extent to which the students are 'isolated' from the home during this period of time." "… objectives can best be attained where the individual is separated from earlier environmental conditions and when he is in association with a group of peers who are changing in much the same direction and who thus tend to reinforce each other." (Book 2: Affective Domain)
The following section is from a book explaining how the Communist Chinese brainwash their victims.
"The manner in which the prisoner came to be influenced to accept the Communist's definition of his guilt can best be described by distinguishing two broad phases—(1) a process of 'unfreezing,' in which the prisoner's physical resistance, social and emotional supports, self-image and sense of integrity, and basic values and personality were undermined, thereby creating a state of 'readiness' to be influence; and (2) a process of 'change,' in which the prisoner discovered how the adoption of 'the people's standpoint' and a reevaluation of himself from this perspective would provide him with a solution to the problems created by the prison pressure."
"Most were put into a cell containing several who were further along in reforming themselves and who saw it as their primary duty to "help" their most backward member to see the truth about himself in order that the whole cell might advance. Each such cell had a leader who was in close contact with the authorities for purposes of reporting on the cell's progress and getting advice on how to handle the Western member . . . the environment undermined the (clients) self-image."
". . . Once this process of self of self re-evaluation began, the (client) received all kinds of help and support from the cell mates and once again was able to enter into meaningful emotional relationships with others." (Interpersonal Dynamics: Essays in Readings on Human Interaction, ed. Warren G. Bennis, Edgar H. Schein, David E. Berlew, and Fred I. Steele)
Mao's long march across America began in earnest the 50's and 60's with the introduction of Marxist curriculum, i.e., "Bloom's Taxonomies" into the school systems across America. The "educator" (facilitator of 'change') does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school, if they were not doing that already (telling them would be "old school," maintaining the "old" world order of being told even if it was done for the 'purpose' of 'change,' i.e., for the 'purpose' of creating a "new" world order), all they have to do is use a curriculum in the classroom that "encourages," i.e., pressures the students to participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., into dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, 'justifying' their carnal nature, i.e., "lust" over and therefore against their parents authority. Being told to be "positive" (supportive of the other students carnal nature) and not "negative" (judging them by their parents standards) pressures students to 'justify' their and the other students love of pleasure and hate of restrain, doing so in order to be approved, i.e., affirmed by "the group," resulting in "the group" labeling those students who, holding onto their parents standards, i.e., refusing to participate in the process of 'change' or fighting against it as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' resisters of 'change,' not "team players," lower order thinkers, in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictators, anti-social, etc., i.e., "hurting" peoples "feelings" resulting in "the group" rejecting them—the student's natural desire for approval and fear of rejection forces him to participate. The same outcome applies to all adults, in any profession who participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., of 'justifying' compromise for the sake of lust. Once you are 'labeled,' you are 'labeled' for life. In the soviet union (as in Communist China), once you were (are) 'labeled' "psychological" (a resister to 'change'—refusing to compromise to the lusts of the 'moment' for the sake of relationship with others) no matter how important you were in the past (are in the present), your life was over, your career was (is) done. The same is true for America today.
"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4
The new world order is based upon the child's, i.e., the facilitator of 'change's carnal nature, 'justifying' his natural inclination to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, 'justifying' his negation (removal) of anyone who gets in his way, doing so without having a guilty conscience. The road to "Utopia" is paved with the bodies of those who got in the way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous.
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4
Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.
"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17
Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.
"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2021