The Deceitfulness Of Words.
(Personal note.)

Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

"Your child has leadership skills" the "educator" said to the parent. The parent, proud of his child, returned, "Thank You. His mother and I are proud of him too." The "educator," proud of his 'liberty' and support to turn the child into a socialist, turns and leaves with the parent's approval.

"'fusion-words' . . . to solve the 'is' and 'ought' problem." "To identify with more and more of the world, moving toward the ultimate of mysticism, a fusion with the world, or peak experience, cosmic consciousness, etc."  Abraham MaslowThe Farther Reaches of Human Nature; The Journals of Abraham Maslow

The "is" is the way the parent sees the world, with his children obeying him. The "ought" is the world the child sees, where he can do what he wants, when he wants, with the parent not getting in his way. By the facilitator of 'change's' use of "fusion words," i.e., words of ambiguity he can deceive (trick) the parent into thinking he is training his child up in his image while instead "helping" the child 'create' a world made in his image, i.e., a world of "ought," negating the parent's authority (in the mind of the child) turning the child's world of "ought" into a world of "is."

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. BloomTaxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

Bringing dialogue ("feelings," i.e., the child's carnal desires, i.e., "lusts," i.e., "self interest" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., his "ought") into an environment establishing right and wrong behavior negates discussion (facts and truth, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to one's "self" in order to hear and do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., the world that "is"), 'liberating' the child from the father's/Father's authority so he can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience (that the father's/Father's authority engenders), with impunity (with the approval of others, affirming his "lust," i.e., his "self interest" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority). "Fusion-words" make the job easier with the father thinking one thing and the child experiencing another under the same words, i.e., "leadership skills." In such an environment, where "is" and "ought," i.e., discussion and dialogue, i.e., the father's/Father's authority and the child carnal desires collide (conflict) the child is pressured to either go with the world of "is," i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., discussion, insisting upon everyone doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth (and face the rejection of the class) or go with the world of "ought," i.e., his carnal desires, i.e., dialogue, with dialogue, i.e., the world or "ought," i.e., his carnal desires, i.e., his "lusts," i.e., his "self interest" more than likely winning out, with the class's and the facilitator of 'change's' affirmation. 

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen HabermasKnowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)

"There is no more important issue than the interrelationship of the group members." "To question the value or activities of the group, would be to thrust himself into a state of dissonance." "Few individuals, as Asch has shown, can maintain their objectivity in the face of apparent group unanimity." (Irvin D. YalomThe Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy)

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

By 'discovering,' through dialogue, the child's "self interests," i.e., carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" and 'justifying' them (not judging or condemning him) the child is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority so he along with the class and the facilitator of 'change' can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience, with affirmation. The use of "fusion-words" makes this all possible.

"And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." 2 Peter 2:3

In other words, through your "lusts," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "self interests," i.e., your world of "ought" (covetousness) they are able to use "fusion-words" (feigned words means plastic words in the Greek) to gain your trust, being able to then turn you into "human resource" (merchandise) to be used by them for their own carnal pleasures, i.e., "lusts," i.e., "self interests," and gain.

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020