Socialists are children in adult bodies.

Dean Gotcher

"and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall cause them to be put to death."  Mark 13:12

The proletarian are socialist (Marxists), i.e. children of "class consciousness," i.e. "children of disobedience," i.e. children who feel, think, and act, and relate with one another and the world without a father's authority, united in consensus in the praxis (social or community action) of negating the father's authority, i.e. the King, i.e. the traditional "top-down" form of government (including our constitution republic form of government which limits the power of government so that the father can be King over his own home, land, and business, training his children up, under his authority, under the authority of God) as well as negating those who support it, i.e. the bourgeoisie, i.e. the middle-class from society.  Through the use of psychoanalysis (the "group grade," i.e. therapy), i.e. through the merging of Marx and Freud (bringing Marx into the school, workplace, government, church, and home via. psychoanalysis), i.e. the merging of socialism and psychology, i.e. the merging of the society and the individual, i.e. replacing the preaching and teaching of commands and rules to be obeyed (with the use of chastening for disobedience and casting out for question and challenging the father's authority), and facts and truth to be accepted as is (by faith) with the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (there is no father's authority in the dialoguing of opinions), the father's authority is negated not only in the individual but in society as well, making all "one," i.e. "equal" in nature, i.e. carnal, i.e. "adaptable to 'change,'" "tolerant of deviancy," with the facilitator of 'change' being more equal than all the rest.  "Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making, our objective centers upon .... transform public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests.... transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps..."  (Ervin LaszloA Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

Since the "guilty conscience" is the father's authority (the father's voice) in the child's mind, negating the father's authority in the child's feelings, thoughts, and actions and in his relationship with others and the world (the children/youth learning to "solve" personal, social, and world problems "in and for themselves" in a "group setting," without being directed in/told what is right and wrong behavior by an adult authority) produces a child without a "guilty conscience," i.e. produces a child who can do unconscionable things in the name of 'change,' promoting "socialist unity and worldly peace," i.e. "making the world safe for democracy," i.e. creating a new world order void of Godly restraint.  Since the child, by nature, bases 'reality' upon the approaching of pleasure and the avoiding of pain, by negating the father's authority, i.e. that reality is doing right and not wrong according to the father's standards, augmenting pleasure and attenuating pain becomes the 'drive' and 'purpose' of life, with hatred towards any authority which restraints (blocks or inhibits) the child's nature becoming the way of life.  If the child loves pleasure, i.e. "lusts" after the pleasures of the 'moment' then he hates anyone or anything restraining (blocking or inhibiting) him from attaining the pleasures of the 'moment.'  But if the child loves the father, i.e. desires to do the father's will, then he hates his "self" when he disobeys.  In other words: when the child loves the father, then the father's restraints are a source of peace to the child's soul but when he loves the pleasures of the flesh, i.e. when he "lusts" after the pleasures of the 'moment' then he hates the father because of his restraints.

Karl Marx (who based 'reality' upon man and his flesh, i.e. upon the pleasures of the 'moment' and not upon God and the soul, who/which is eternal) wrote: "It is not individualism [the child under parental authority, desiring parental approval or man under God's authority desiring God's approval, i.e. the child or man personally being held accountable for his thoughts and actions before the parent and/or God] that fulfills the individual [that satisfies the child or man's flesh], on the contrary it destroys him [it turns him against or divides him from his own carnal nature and alienates him from becoming at-one-with all the children/men of the world].  Society [common-unity, common-ism, i.e. what man has in common, i.e. his carnal nature] is the necessary framework through which freedom and individuality [the child or man 'liberated' from Godly restraint, free to be himself, i.e. carnal, i.e. in, of, and for the world (Nature) only] are made realities."  Marx loved the pleasures of this life and hated godly restraint. You, by your very own nature have the same inclination, i.e. love of pleasure and hate of restraint.  You have Marx in you.  Marxism would not work if Marx was not in you (or in your children), waiting to be 'liberated.'  It is the duty of every contemporary educator, i.e. facilitator of 'change,' i.e. psychoanalyst (with educators being trained in the use of Bloom's Taxonomies, now Marzano's, Webb's Taxonomies in the classroom) to 'liberate' the Marx in your child, the Marx in your spouse, the Marx in your boss, the Marx in your co-workers, the Marx in your legislators, town councilmen, mayor, governor, and judges, the Marx in your minister, and the Marx in you, 'liberating' all the world from Godly restraint.

Socialists (Marxists) blame the environment (their upbringing, i.e. their parents, their teacher, the home, the workplace, and the "community" environment, their lack of money, food, being loved, etc.) for their failures (for their sins), not holding themselves personally accountable for their thoughts and actions before God.  Socialism (environmentalism and humanism, i.e. Marxism) began in the garden in Eden with the woman and Adam choosing the pleasures (desires) of the 'moment' over and against God's authority (with the woman being the first environmentalist, i.e. the first "tree-hugger" and Adam being the first humanist, i.e. following after the woman instead of obeying God).  Adam and Eve were the first socialists—with Adam blaming Eve for his sin (for his failure) and Eve blaming the first facilitator of 'change' for her sin (for her failure), willing to throw someone else "under the bus" for their sins (socialist beware of your "friends"), in a round about way blaming God for their sin.

By getting rid of the issue of failure, i.e. doing wrong according to the father's standards, i.e. his commands, rules, facts, and truth, by making the child's carnal nature, i.e. his love of pleasure and his hate of restraint the "norm," the socialist/the Marx in the child is 'liberated' from parental restraint  In this way, by getting rid of the issue of sin, i.e. doing wrong according to God's standards, i.e. His commands, rules, facts and truth, by making man's carnal nature, i.e. his love of pleasure and his hate of restraint the "norm," the socialist/the Marx in man is 'liberated' from Godly restraint  When God and His authority is negated in man's feelings, thoughts, and actions as well as in his relationship with other men and the world, the "guilty conscience" for sinning (for disobedience) is negated, 'liberating' the world from Godly restraint, 'liberating' it to do unconscionable things (unrighteousness and abominations) in the name of 'change' (progress).

If you respond to home schooling parent's with "What about your child's social life?" you are a socialist, i.e. you a Marxist (you are Marx) no matter how much you might try to deny it.  You are a child in an adult body, concerned with the child's pleasures of the 'moment' instead of being concerned about their doing right and not wrong according to their parent's authority.  You should be concerned not only about their walk before their parents in this life but concerned about their walk before God, their Heavenly Father and His obedient Son, Jesus Christ as well, concerned with where they will spend eternity.  Your response reflects who you have been fellowship with (talking to), i.e. with your "self" and its love of the world, i.e. with Karl Marx (a "child of disobedience") or with the Father, and His only begotten (obedient) Son ,Jesus Christ.

God's Word says: "So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God."  Romans 14:12   Which paradigm or pathway of feeling, thinking, and acting and relating with others and the world are you traveling down, encouraging others to travel down with you, i.e. Marx's or the Lord's.  "Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it."  Matthew 7:13, 14  "For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.  Let no man deceive you with vain words [with words your fleshy/carnal mind wants (desires) to hear, 'liberating' yourself from Godly restraint]: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.  Be not ye therefore partakers with them."  "And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.  For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret."  Ephesians 5:5-7, 11, 12  "Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others."  Ephesians 2:2,3

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2015