Socialism-Psychology aka "Group Psychotherapy" Is Rebellion, Anarchy, And Revolution Against The Father's Authority System.
"And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother's keeper?" Genesis 4:9
"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. "1 John 2:15
"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16
"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15
"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth], and desperately wicked [hating and striking out against the father's/Father's authority that "gets in the way," i.e. that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9 You can not see your "self interest," which includes your hate of restraint, as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure ("self interest"), getting in the way, blinds you to it. Like a drug, pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., "self interest" which the world stimulates blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness" which is being expressed toward those who are preventing (or trying to prevent) you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—making you not just "wicked" but "desperately wicked" in your effort (doing "whatever it takes") to attain it, keep it, or get it back.
"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4
In two sentences (below) Kurt Lewin summed up the "problem" and the "solution"—for the socialist-psychologist: the "problem" being the father's/Father's authority "repressing" the children ("the people"), i.e., preventing them from being (becoming) their "self," i.e., "of and for self" and the world only, "alienating" them from one another, i.e., preventing them from finding their identity in one another, preventing "worldly peace and socialist harmony," and how to 'liberate' them, not only from the father's/Father's authority but from the effect the father's/Father's authority has upon them, i.e., the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, so they can be (become) their "self," i.e., do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") with impunity (with affirmation).
"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin; A Dynamic Theory of Personality)
According to Kurt Lewin, since the guilty conscience, what he called a "negative valance," is the result of the father's/Father's threat of punishment for doing wrong or for disobeying, what Lewin called "an induced field of force of an adult," preventing the child from having or doing what he desires to do or from having what he wants to have in the 'moment,' what Lewin called "a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child," by simply removing, in the mind of the child, the father's/Father's authority, i.e., by putting the child in a "safe zone, space, or place," "Don't be negative, be positive" environment where he can question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack authority, negating that which is "negative" without fear of reprimand, i.e., "if this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority" the guilty conscience is negated in the process, i.e., "the negative valance also disappears."
"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves: the superego 'unites in itself the influences of the present and of the past [the child's carnal nature, i.e., "feelings," i.e., his or her love of pleasure and hate of restraint—experienced in the past as well as being experienced in the present].'" (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) By "studying" history, not from being told (taught) commands, rules, facts, and truth from the "past," but from his own "feelings," i.e., his "sense experiences" of the past and the present, the student recreates the world in accordance to his own carnal nature, 'justifying' the overthrow of parental authority aka nationalism, under God, without having a guilty conscience.
"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing)
The father's/Father's authority, i.e., being held accountable for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning ("lusting" after the things of the world), i.e. accepting and obeying the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining your "self" in order to do the father's/Father' will engenders the guilty conscience in you for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning ("lusting" after the things of the world). By negating the father's/Father's authority in the children's thoughts and actions (through the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus in the "group grade" classroom), the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning ("lusting") is negated, 'justifying' (in the children's thoughts and actions) their negation of anyone who gets in the way of pleasure, i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates—which includes the pleasure which comes with the affirmation (approval, i.e., 'justification') of men (their classmates). Affirmation is not only intoxicating, it is addictive and possessive as well. In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process the father's/Father's authority is negated, i.e., rebellion, anarchy, and revolution is engendered, creating a generation of children who (in their thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice") can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") with impunity, i.e., can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") without having a guilty conscience—the voice of "the people," i.e., "the group" 'justifying' (affirming) their carnal thoughts and carnal actions drowning out the voice of the father/Father, warning them of the consequence of their actions, i.e., judgment, condemnation, and damnation which will follow, attempting to restrain them). While claiming to care about "the people," they have in fact become as Cane, no longer their "brothers keeper," i.e., no longer caring about what happens to those who they have negated (the unborn, elderly, innocent, righteous), who got in the way of pleasure (their "lusts")—the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process determines, in their mind, i.e., in their "feelings," who their "brother" is. "Make me 'feel' 'good,' i.e., like God (only God is good) and you are my brother." "Hurt my 'feelings,' i.e., make me 'feel' 'bad,' i.e., guilty for my lusts (sins) and you are not my brother." The pathway to "Utopia" (to the world of "lust," i.e., to "human nature" only) is strewn with the bodies of those who got in the way.
"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') In other words: "Lust" "reconciles us to" "the world." Therefore the father's/Father's authority—which prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks "lust"—must be negated if the world is to become one.
"Sense experience must be the basis of all science. Science is only genuine science when it proceeds from sense experience, in the two forms of sense perception and sensuous need, that is, only when it proceeds from Nature." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3) "Behavior 'science"' (Marxism) simply re-labels (re-defines) "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life" as "sensuous needs," "sense perception," and "sense experience" so the child's carnal nature can be affirmed as the "norm," establishing the child's carnal nature over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority. "Behavior 'science'" (Marxism) is "science falsely so called" (2 Timothy 6:20), negating the child's faith in the father/Father, resulting in the child rejecting the father's/Father's authority in his thoughts and actions (replacing "belief-action dichotomy," i.e., that which is above, i.e., the father's/Father's authority with "theory and practice," i.e., that which is below, i.e., his carnal nature only) so he can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") in peace (without having a guilty conscience) and with impunity (with affirmation from others). There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, i.e., in the language (means of communication) of "behavior 'science,'" there is only the carnal nature ("lusts") of the child, i.e., the language of "Nature," i.e., of "human nature," i.e., of that is which is "of the world" "only."
"Once the earthly family [with children having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [with the Son humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining his "self" in order to do the Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth], the former [the earthly father's authority, i.e., the system itself with children having to trust in (have faith in) and obey the father (their parents), their teacher, the laws of the land, etc.,] must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice [in the children's thoughts as well as in their actions—resulting in children no longer "fellowshipping" with one another based upon the father's/Father's (their parents/God's) commands, rules, facts, and truth but, through dialogue, "building relationship" with one another based upon their carnal nature, i.e., their carnal desires, i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment,' 'creating' a "new" world order of "lawfulness without law," i.e., "lawlessness" where the child's carnal nature rules without parental restraint]." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)
"'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [the father no longer exercises his authority or has authority over his children in the home—forcing them to do right and not wrong according to his established commands, rules, facts, and truth that go against their nature, i.e., their carnal desires of the 'moment,' that the world stimulates]." Sigmund Freud's history of civilization (what he based psychology on) is that of children who, loving the pleasures of the 'moment,' what he called "incest," hating the father's/Father's authority (restraint), what he called a "barrier to incest," not only "killed" the father but ate ("devoured," i.e., "negated") him as well. "... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)
"Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions [a "positive" environment void of the father's/Father's authority where children can "actualize" their "self" without fear of judgment or condemnation] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [a "negative" environment where children have to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do the father's/Father's aka their parents will] stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)
"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [their parent's/God's authority aka the father's/Father's authority]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)
"I have found whenever I ran across authoritarian students [those who believe in the father's/Father's authority] that the best thing for me to do was to break their backs immediately." "The correct thing to do with authoritarians is to take them realistically for the bastards they are and then behave toward them as if they were bastards." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)
In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process the father's/Father's authority system is "devoured," i.e., the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning ("lusting") is "negated." There is no father's/Father's authority in the praxis of psychology. Despite what those who praxis psychology might say, it's sole 'drive' is the child's carnal nature ("lust"). It's sole 'purpose' is to negate the father's/Father's authority, thereby negating the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning ("lusting") in the process, so the psychiatrist (psychotherapist) can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") with impunity, labeling anyone who gets in his or her way as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' a resister of 'change,' not a "team player," a "lower order thinker," "in denial," phobic, neurotic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictator, anti-social, psychological, etc., silencing, i.e., censoring, i.e., negating them in the thoughts and actions of "the people." Once a psychologist 'labels' you, you can never escape their judgment, condemnation, rejection. When they tell you, "You can share anything you want without being judged, condemned, rejected" (in "the group" session), as their master psychotherapist did in the garden in Eden, i.e., "Ye shall not surly die," they lie. You are condemned for life if you do not join, i.e., affirm and worship them, 'justifying' their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulus. They are right when they say "It is not about you." It is all about them, with you 'justifying' their carnal nature, i.e., their love of pleasure ("lusts") and hate of the father's/Father's authority. That is why so many of them commit suicide, coming to realize the hollowness of their life, i.e., their lies, realizing the death and destruction (hopelessness) they have brought in the lives of those who listened to them (who they lived well off of), believing their lies.
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4
Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.
"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17
"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50
"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9
"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21
"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6
Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.
"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020