Social Worth.

Dean Gotcher

When "social worth" is brought up in order to decide how to judge a person, there can be no justice—right and wrong are sacrificed upon the alter of "self interest," i.e., "what can I get out of this for me."

"Jurisprudence of terror takes two forms; loosely defined rules which produces unpredictable law, and spontaneous changes in rules to best suit the state [the "self interest" of those in power]."  (R. W. Makepeace and Croom Helm, Marxist Ideology and Soviet Criminal Law)

"When a man has finally reached the point where he does not think he knows it better than others [when right and wrong are no longer an issue regarding a persons thoughts and actions], that is when he has become indifferent to what they have done badly [notice that Hegel did not use the word "wrong," which is punishable, only badly, which is not—letting the socialist "off the hook" for doing wrong. Run your business like this and see how long you stay in business. This is why socialists have to keep looking for more victims to pillage, living off their money and labor, forcing them to pay and support them for the "good" of "the people"] and he is interested only in what they have done right, then peace and affirmation ["the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., "sensuous needs," "sense perception," and "sense experience" (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3), i.e., "self" 'justification before men] have come to him." (G. F. W. Hegel in Carl Friedrich, The Philosophy of Hegel)

"Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing  right and not wrong according the Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., having to set aside pleasure, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to "self" in order to do God the Father's will], and desperately wicked [hating God the Father and His authority which "gets in the way," i.e. which prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks it from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9 Those of dialectic 'reasoning,' as a children of disobedience 'justifying' their "self" can not see their hatred toward God the Father as being evil because their love of "self," i.e., their love of pleasure—which the world stimulates—is "in the way," blinding them to the truth of the deceitfulness and wickedness of their heart.

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

"On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child [their common "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, including (and especially) their desire for ("lusting" after) approval from one another (affirmation), i.e., the "pride of life"], where there is no antithesis [no "top-down," "right-wrong, "Mine, not yours" way of thinking and acting] of person to person or of subject to object, the surplus is not the property of one of them, since their indifference is not a formal or a legal one."  (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

In "social worth," i.e., what you are worth in the socialist's eyes, private (as in private convictions, property, business, etc., i.e., your unalienable rights, under God) is sacrificed on the alter of the "common-ist's 'good,'" i.e., "self interest." "Building relationship upon 'self interest'" negates you having value or worth in and of yourself, before God. Whatever happens to you in a socialist country is determined by the "feelings," i.e., "lusts" ("felt needs"), i.e., opinions of those in power. Your spouse is not yours but the "communities," i.e., the socialists, your children are not yours but the "communities," i.e., the socialists, your property is not yours but the "communities," i.e., the socialists, your business is not yours but the "communities," i.e., the socialists, etc., you are not yours but the "communities," i.e., the socialists to do with as they want, in the name of "the people," i.e., their "self ."

 "Laws must not fetter human life; but yield to it; they must change as the needs and capacities of the people [the socialists] change." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right)

"It is not individualism [the child subject to the father's/Father's authority, doing the father's/Father's will instead of his own] that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him. Society ["human relationship based upon self interest," i.e., finding one's identity in "the group," i.e., in society] is the necessary framework through which freedom [from the father's/Father's authority] and individuality [being "of and for self" and the world] are made realities." (Karl Marx, in John Lewis, The Life and Teachings of Karl Marx)

"The real nature of man is the totality of social relations." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach #6)

Sigmund Freud believed "the individual is emancipated in the social group." "Freud speaks of religion as a 'substitute-gratification'—the Freudian analogue to the Marxian formula, 'opiate of the people.'" "Freud commented that only through the solidarity of all the participants could the sense of guilt [the guilty conscience for disobeying the father/Father] be assuaged." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)

In the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "positive," dialoguing opinions to a consensus, soviet, brainwashing,  psychotherapy, i.e., facilitated i.e., Transformational Marxist, affective domain, "snowflake" creating classroom your child's social worth (socialist worth) is being judged by the group. It has been going on since the 50's through the use of "Bloom's Taxonomies" in the classroom. All "educators" are certified and all schools (for all ages and for all professions) are accredited based upon their knowledge and use of "Blooms' Taxonomies," i.e., Marxism in the classroom. Dialogue, i.e., sharing your private convictions, sacrificing them on the alter of social worth, negates the father's/Father's authority in the thoughts and actions of all participates, negating their having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process.

"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" "Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

Dialogue is informal. Dialogue has no father's/Father's authority (which is formal), so those participating in dialogue, i.e., suspending commands, rules, facts, and the truth, as upon a cross in order to continue in dialogue, can not be judged for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning (killing the innocent and righteous) since there is no "wrong" in dialogue. An opinion is just that, an opinion, i.e., "I think" or "I feel," so all a person can be judged for is doing the job badly, which is not a crime, unless he is getting in the way of socialism, refusing to dialogue, demanding things be done right and not wrong instead. Then he is wrong, needing to be remediated or removed for the "good" of the "community," i.e., for the "good" (pleasure and gain) of the socialists. After all having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning gets in the way of having pleasure doing your own thing—why socialists are so hateful when anyone, including the unborn and the elderly "get in their way." In dialogue, the law of the flesh negates the authority of the  father/Father, 'liberating' the child from the father's/Father's authority, so he can be his "self," i.e., "of and for self," i.e., carnal, of and for the world only. This is what Immanuel Kant meant by "lawfulness without law," i.e., the carnal nature of the child ruling, void of the father's/Father's laws of restraint. It is what Georg Hegel, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud had in mind.

"It is the absence of social capital within the family that we have labeled 'deficiencies' in the family." "the schools as a means of emancipation from the family" "releasing a child from the blinders imposed by [the] family." (James S. Coleman, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE HIGH SCHOOLS, The Impact of Communities)

When "social capital" supersedes "physical" and "mental capital," (money, property, etc., and education, skills, etc.) all are judged according to their "social worth," keeping the socialist in power, doing unconscionable things without having a guilty conscience—making laws forcing all to support, serve, defend, praise, and worship them, despite their deceitful and wicked ways, for the "good" of "the people."

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2019