Why The Police?
(Personal note.)

Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

You can not have a "police state" with policemen with a conscience, who believe in the rule of law, i.e., the authority of the traditional home.

The French directorate (of the French Revolution) had to restructure the parishes (counties) of France in order to negate the old guard, i.e., the parish Sheriff and local police, who by nature were loyal to the culture of the local parish, i.e., the father's/Father's authority. By traumatizing, i.e., intimidating and demeaning the Sheriff and police and forcing them into dialogue (there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, there is only the individuals "self interest," i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the situation is stimulating), doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., 'loyalty' to local control, i.e., culture is replace with a socialist mindset, i.e., "self interest," i.e., "self" preservation, i.e., "building relationship upon self interest"—socialism.

"The community of interest generated by crime, disorder and fear of crime becomes the goal to allow community policing officer an entre into the geographic community." (Trojanowicz, The meaning of “Community” in Community Policing)

Instead of serving and protecting the neighborhood, i.e., stopping crime the Sheriff and police are being process (programed) to use crime in order to gain access to the "geographical community"—replacing jurisdiction (which sustains culture) with regionalism (which transcends, i.e., negates culture). While the county Sheriff and local police may resist and oppose this movement, the training forced upon those joining the force (the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., affirmation process), along with administration and laws being passed are overwhelming them, placing their job and even their lives in jeopardy. All the procedures of the French Revolution are in full swing today, working to negate the local police and county Sheriff's loyalty to the local neighborhood, county, and nation, defending its culture—which comes from the middle-class family, i.e., the father's authority in the home, teaching children right from wrong in order to do right according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, engendering a guilty conscience in them when they do wrong, disobey, sin.

"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing)

Trojanowicz knew the consequence of bypassing the "guilty conscience"—a police state, something his program continues to engender today. By bringing the county Sheriffs and local police together across the state and the nation, having to decide right from wrong, i.e., policy (policing) through the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., affirmation process the mindset of the French Revolution replaces their mindset which is loyal to their local county, their local citizens, and their nation. As in education, the workplace, government, and even the "church" the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., affirmation process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., 'reasoning' from "feelings" negates the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world (the current situation) stimulates, making "self," i.e., "self interest," i.e., "lust" more important than holding to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., "rule of law," i.e., the father's/Father's authority.

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'"  (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy) In this way, i.e. through therapy, i.e., the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., affirmation process "self" is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority (system).

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory) It is in dialogue we discover our commonality with one another, i.e., our common "self interests" in each other, 'justifying' our "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., that which is "of the world" only.

Replacing individualism, under God with "group think," i.e., with socialism/globalism those who participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., affirmation process unite as one in negating local control, the traditional family, 'loyalty' to the nation, and the constitution they swore to serve and protect. With such a mindset the local citizen and the nation is at risk. While most Sheriffs and police resist the process, as laws and administrators trained in its use force them to participate they either quietly retire (to save their retirement checks) or succumb. To resist would be fatal to their retirement, their reputation, and (down the road as it gains total control) even their lives.

"All cooperative schemes which provide equal remuneration to the skilled and industrious and the ignorant and idle must work their own downfall. For by this unjust plan they must of necessity eliminate the valuable members and retain only the improvident, unskilled, and vicious." (Robert Dale Owen, Robert Owen's son)

"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [their parent's/God's authority aka the father's/Father's authority]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost ["lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, making pleasure right and restraint wrong, engendering anarchy]." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)

"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making, our objective centers upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." ((Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020