While the "Bill of Rights" (unalienable rights) gives the father the right to say "My child(ren), property, business, etc., not yours" socialist-globalists (Rousseau, Hegel, Marx, Freud etc.,), i.e., those of the "new" world order, in defiance to the "Bill of rights" (unalienable rights) say instead "Our child(ren), not just yours," i.e., "Our children. Not yours." According to which paradigm, i.e., which way of thinking and acting do you train up your children to embrace, support, and propagate, to embrace, support, and propagate the rule of law, i.e., to think and act according to the father's/Father's way of thinking and acting or to embrace, support, and propagate the rebellious, anarchistic, and revolutionary nature of the child, i.e., to think and act according to the child's carnal nature? While those in support of the "Bill of Rights" embrace, support, and propagate the father's/Father's authority (the Patriarchal Paradigm), i.e., embrace, support, and propagate the father's/Father's liberty ("right") to train up his child(ren) in his image, resulting in his children thinking and acting according to his way of thinking and acting, i.e., according to the rule of law, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will, socialists-globalists (those of the Heresiarchal Paradigm) embrace, support, and propagate 'liberating' children, i.e., the child's carnal nature from the father's/Father's authority, so they can do wrong, disobey, sin without having a guilty conscience, i.e., so they can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity—as long as their doing wrong, disobeying, sinning is done for the "good" of the "community," i.e., for the good of society, i.e., for the advancement of socialism-globalism (for the socialist-globalist)
Whoever trains up the child(ren) determines the future paradigm, i.e., the future way of thinking and acting. "The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." (Kurt Lewin in Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education) A book (of two books, referred to as "Bloom's Taxonomies") from which all teachers are certified and schools are accredited by today proudly proclaims: "There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain) Change how teachers (and students) communicate with one another in the classroom, with teachers and students dialoguing their opinions to a consensus concerning personal-social issues makes teachers therapists, i.e., counselors, i.e., social-ist engineers, i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., facilitators of 'change,' i.e., 'change' agents, 'changing' traditional minded students into socialists, making your children theirs.
"The direction which constitutes the good life is psychological freedom to move in any direction [where] the general qualities of this selected direction appear to have a certain universality [the "good life," according to Rogers, is found in the child's carnal (rebellious) nature, which is common to all children, not in the father's/Father's authority, which separates children from their own carnal nature and therefore divides children from one another]." "Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
It is all about you either believing in, i.e., embracing, supporting, and propagating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof." (1 Corinthians 10:26) or you believing in, i.e., embracing, supporting, and propagating the socialist-globalists, i.e., the children of disobedience, i.e., "the fruits of the earth belong to us all, and the earth itself to nobody." (Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Discourse on Inequality) Socialist-globalists 'justify' their quest for power, i.e., control over your children, your property, your business, and all of the world by doing what two "children" did in a garden called Eden—convincing themselves that that which was not theirs was theirs, i.e., was "Ours," they, by their actions (praxis), declared that all that is in the garden/world belonged to everyone, i.e., belonged to them, resulting in the "Father" driving them out, posting security at the door, declaring, in essence, "My garden. Not yours."—from whence we not only receive our private property and business rights but the right (duty) to train up our children to honor, i.e., embrace, support, and propagate the father's/Father's authority.
Georg Hegel wrote, in defense of the child's carnal nature, i.e., in defiance to the father's/Father's authority: "The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority so that he can be his "self," i.e., as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life, i.e., carnal, i.e., of the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)
Hegel then wrote, sounding more like Karl Marx than Karl Marx himself (who was not yet born): "On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child [their common "lusting" after the pleasures of the world, including (and especially) their desire for approval from others (affirmation) and their hate of restraint], where there is no antithesis [no "top-down," "right-wrong, "Mine, not yours" way of thinking and acting] of person to person or of subject to object [where there is no father's/Father's authority], the surplus is not the property of one of them, since their indifference is not a formal or a legal one." ibid. In other words your spouse, your children, your property, your business, etc., and even you are not yours but the socialist-globalists, subject to their ("Our") "felt" needs of the 'moment.'
Karl Marx wrote, in defense of the child's carnal nature, i.e., in defiance to the father's/Father's authority: "Once the earthly family [with the family submitting to the father's authority] is discovered to be the secret of the heavenly [Holy] family [with the Son and those following Him submitting to His Heavenly Father's authority], the former [the earthly father's authority in the family] must be destroyed [Vernunft, annihilated] in theory and in practice [in the children's thoughts and actions]." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis # 4)
Sigmund Freud wrote, in defense of the child's carnal nature, i.e., in defiance to the father's/Father's authority: "'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [the father no longer exercises his authority in the home, i.e., over the family]." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization)
ALL of psychology (therapy) is, as is Marxism, based upon the 'liberation' of children from the father's/Father's authority. There is no other 'drive' or 'purpose.' "Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy) "Marxian theory needs Freudian-type instinct theory to round it out. And of course, vice versa." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" "Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., rule of law]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost." "Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)
"Freud, Hegel, ... are, like Marx, compelled to postulate external domination and its assertion by force [the father's/Father's authority] in order to explain repression." "According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic, and demands activity according to the pleasure-principle [according to the carnal nature of the child]." "The repression of normal adult sexuality is required only by cultures which are based on patriarchal domination. The foundation on which the man [the world] of the future will be built is already there, in the repressed unconscious [in the carnal nature of the child]; the foundation has to be recovered [the children have to be 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority—the goal of every psychotherapist]." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)
If you start with the carnal nature of the child, i.e., with the child's "feelings," which are driven by his love of pleasure and hate of restraint, then "freedom" means 'liberty' from the father's/Father's authority, so you can be yourself, i.e., of the world only, i.e., as you were before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into your life. This is the socialist-globalist only agenda, i.e., the nature of the "beast," making you and all the world subject to the carnal nature, i.e., the desires and dissatisfactions of the socialist-globalists, i.e., the children of disobedience.
Carl Rogers wrote, in defense of the child's carnal nature, i.e., in defiance to the father's/Father's authority: "We know how to change the opinions of an individual in a selected direction, without his ever becoming aware of the stimuli which changed his opinion." "We know how to influence the ... behavior of individuals by setting up conditions which provide satisfaction for needs of which they are unconscious, but which we have been able to determine." "If we have the power or authority to establish the necessary conditions, the predicted behaviors [our potential ability to influence or control the behavior of groups] will follow." "We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalizing them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood." "'Now that we know how positive reinforcement works [dialoguing opinions to a consensus, i.e., dialoguing our feelings (our carnal desires of the 'moment') to a feeling of oneness ('discovering' through dialogue the common carnal desires that we can all agree on, thereby affirming ourselves, and working together, as one, in fulfilling them, we establish our carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., our "self" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., his/His restraints)], and why negative doesn't' [the father's/Father's authority to 1) give us commands and rules which go counter to and therefore restrain our carnal desires of the 'moment,' 2) reward us or bless us when we do what is right and obey, 3) chasten us when we do wrong and disobey, and 4) cast out those who disrespect i.e. who question and/or challenge his/His authority, i.e., who reject his/His restraints]... 'we can be more deliberate and hence more successful in our cultural design. We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled [the manipulated] though they are following a code much more scrupulously [more government regulations and oversight (sight based management)] than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do. That's the source of the tremendous power of positive reinforcement—there's no restrain and no revolt. By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behavior—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
Abraham Maslow, merging Marxism and psychology—both of which seek to 'liberate' the child's carnal nature from the father's/Father's authority (thus embracing, supporting, and propagating the immorality, i.e., deviancy which follows)—promoted ridding the child's mind and the world of sovereignty, i.e., of the father's/Father's authority. He wrote: "Nakedness is absolutely right. So is the attack on antieroticism, the Christian & Jewish foundations." "I've decided to get into the World Federalists, become pro-UN, & the like." "Only a world government with world-shared values could be trusted or permitted to take such powers. If only for such a reason a world government is necessary. It too would have to evolve. I suppose it would be weak or lousy or even corrupt at first―it certainly doesn't amount to much now & won't until sovereignty is given up little by little by 'nations.'" "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World, at least so far as the guiding goal is concerned. To get to that goal is politics & is in time and space & will take a long time & cost much blood." "A caretaker government could immediately start training for democracy & self-government & give it little by little, as deserved." (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)
Abraham Maslow, in defense of the child's carnal nature, i.e., in defiance to the father's/Father's authority, wrote: "I have found whenever I ran across authoritarian students that the best thing for me to do was to break their backs immediately." "The correct thing to do with authoritarians is to take them realistically for the bastards they are and then behave toward them as if they were bastards." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management) Socialist-globalist, i.e., those who claim your child(ren) as theirs, i.e., who identify your child(ren) as "Our children" will treat your child(ren) as Maslow treated students in his classes who embraced, supported, and propagated the father's/Father's authority. When your child(ren) defend your way of thinking and acting, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, which is classified by the socialist-globalist as being "authoritarian," tenement, according to them, to being fascist, they will be treated as the enemy, needing to be converted, silenced, or removed.
"Educators" who call your children "Our children" will treat you the same way (as Maslow treated his traditional minded students) when you get in their way, i.e., when you dare to challenge them, i.e., not give them what they want, when the want it (claiming that what they want, i.e., what they have to have from you, i.e., your support, i.e., your children, money, and time is for your children), accusing you of being "hateful" when you do not "cooperate"—labeling you as being irrational, unreasonable, and therefore treating you as being irrelevant—thus manifesting the carnal nature of the child (loving pleasure and hating restraint), making themselves, i.e., the carnal nature of the rebellious child the standard for life.
Karl Marx wrote, concerning the "educator:" "Concerning the changing of circumstances [paradigms] by men, the educator must himself be educated [he must be re-educated, i.e., his paradigm must be 'changed']." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach # 3) "Re-education aims to change the system of values and beliefs of an individual or a group ['changing' their 'loyalty' (paradigm) from the one restraining the child's carnal nature, i.e., the father's/Father's authority to the one(s) 'liberating' it, i.e., the socialist engineer, i.e., the facilitator of 'change']." "Curriculum [paradigm] change means that the group involved must shift its approval from the old to some new set of reciprocal behavior patterns." (Kenneth D. Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)
"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein." Jeremiah 6:16
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2018