Why Nationalism Is Seen As Fascism By Globalists.
"It is not individualism [the child subject to the father's/Father's authority, having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, having to stand alone against "the group" when they are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning] that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him [makes him "neurotic"—caught between doing the father's/Father's will and doing his will when they are in conflict with one another]. Society ["human relationship based upon self interest," i.e., building relationship with others based upon the child's carnal desires, i.e., finding one's identity, i.e., "self" in "the group," i.e., in society] is the necessary framework through which freedom [from the father's/Father's authority] and individuality [to be "of and for self" and the world only] are made realities." (Karl Marx, in John Lewis, The Life and Teachings of Karl Marx)
Because global socialists can not see the individual outside of "the group," i.e., society, i.e., the "community" they can not accept the rights of the individual, under God (one), i.e., outside of their control. Rejecting God, the one over one ("whosoever"), including them, they can only equate Nationalism, i.e., the individual, under God (unalienable rights, rights not given by man but by one above man) to Fascism, i.e., "the group" under one (which is socialist in nature, only under a dictator, i.e., one). Language, i.e., how we communicate with one another reveals the battlefield of differences, with the difference between discussion and dialogue being the indicator. Unlike discussion, which seeks after one correct answer, causing division when two differing answers are presented and defended, i.e., "I am right and you are wrong," maintaining individualism, dialogue makes all answers (and people) "equal," i.e., everyone is entitled to their opinion, with one common answer (all can accept or tolerate—out of the individuals desire for "the group's" approval, i.e., affirmation aka their fear of "the group's" rejection) being the correct one for the 'moment.' While the Fascist aka National socialist will not discuss or dialogue, the Common-ist aka Global socialist will only dialogue (making discussion subject to dialogue), both negating discussion, i.e., negating an authority above the individual, i.e., above themselves. They both make the individual subject to "the group" and the one(s) in control of it (themselves). It is the method of control that makes the socialists different, no discussion or dialogue at all, or dialogue only (making discussion subject to dialogue), with both negating the father's/Father's authority (the one/One) above the individual (the one). Socialists see (perceive) themselves as the personification of "the people," how they "feel," "the people" must be "feeling," what they think, "the people" must be thinking, making all subject to their carnal nature and the world which stimulates it only.
"Authoritarian submission [humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] was conceived of as a very general attitude that would be evoked in relation to a variety of authority figures—parents, older people, leaders, supernatural power, and so forth." "God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority." "Submission to authority, desire for a strong leader, subservience of the individual to the state [parental authority, local control, Nationalism], and so forth, have so frequently and, as it seems to us, correctly, been set forth as important aspects of the Nazi creed that a search for correlates of prejudice had naturally to take these attitudes into account." "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem [how to 'liberate' children from parental authority, man from God's authority, mankind from Nationalism aka Fascism, etc., so they can be their "self," i.e., "actualize" their "self," no longer seeing their "self" as being subject to a higher authority other then to their carnal desires of the 'moment']." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)
"... the group to which an individual belongs is the ground for his perceptions, his feelings, and his actions" (Kurt Lewin, Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics)
"It is usually easier to change individuals formed into a group than to change any one of them separately." "The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to the group." (Kurt Lewin in Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)
"Kurt Lewin emphasized that the child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." "It changes his cognitive structure, the way he sees the physical and social worlds, including all his facts, concepts, beliefs, and expectations." "It modifies his valences and values, ... his attractions and aversions to groups and group standards, his feelings in regard to status differences, and his reactions to sources of approval or disapproval." (Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education)
A "hierarchy of leaders has to be trained which reach out into all essential sub-parts of the group." "Hitler himself has obviously followed very carefully such a procedure." "The democratic procedure will have to be as thorough and as solidly based on group organization." (Kurt Lewin in Kenneth Bennie, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)
Unlike National socialism (Fascism) and Global socialism aka internationalism (Globalism aka Communism), Nationalism is based upon common standards, cultural values, belief, principles, local control, etc., that are external to the person's "self interests" of the 'moment,' requiring him to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. He therefore, while identifying with the people he lives with and the land or area he lives in, still retains his individuality amongst the many, with doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth controlling his thoughts and actions, dividing him from "the group" when they are wrong.
"Despotism" ...."that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart." (George Washington, Farewell Address)
"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, taking pleasure in doing the father's/Father's will instead of yours], and desperately wicked [hating the father's/Father's authority that "gets in the way," i.e. that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9 You can not see your hate of restraint as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure blinds you to it, i.e., gets in the way. Like a drug, pleasure (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness" which is being expressed toward those who are preventing (or trying to prevent) you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation)—making you not just wicked but "desperately wicked."
America was established upon limited government aka local control (the separation of the branches of government to prevent "despotism"), majority vote, unalienable rights, i.e., a Constitutional Republic in order to protect the individual from "the group," i.e., from mob rule, i.e., from the tyranny of the masses, i.e., from collective consciousness (socialism)—which always leads to despotism, i.e., the one (dictator), where socialism always ends up. The strength (right) of the home, with the father's authority in place protects the nation from socialism. It is why socialist (both National and Global) must negate the tradition family in order to initiate and sustain control over "the people."
"The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism." "... let there be no change by usurpation; for, though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield." (George Washington, Farewell Address)
The workers' council (consensus process aka soviet system of government) it will eliminate the bourgeois separation of the legislature, administration and judiciary." (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)
Socialism made its move in the 50's and 60's when the Supreme Court usurped the office of the Legislators, making law themselves. It is now making headway as legislators usurp the office of the President, deciding how the nation should be led themselves ("deep state"), consolidating all departments as one, in theory and in practice through the consensus process.
"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making, our objective centers upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)
"Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "Only a world government with world-shared values could be trusted or permitted to take such powers. If only for such a reason a world government is necessary. It too would have to evolve. I suppose it would be weak or lousy or even corrupt at first—it certainly doesn't amount to much now & won't until sovereignty is given up little by little by 'nations.'" "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World, at least so far as the guiding goal is concerned. To get to that goal is politics & is in time and space & will take a long time & cost much blood." ". . . A caretaker government could immediately start training for democracy & self-government & give it little by little, as deserved." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.) (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)
"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)
Global socialist's, rejecting the principles of Nationalism, i.e., the individual under one, i.e., God, i.e., the father/Father and his/His authority, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth make their agenda the negation of Nationalism, i.e., the individual under one, so they can rule over (control, i.e., own, i.e., buy and sell) "the people" (their property, business, and soul) in order (as in "new" world order) to use them (as "human resource") for their own pleasure and gain, i.e., "self interests." Their fear, in making "the people" socialist in nature (via socialist laws, i.e., force and the education system), is that "the people" will turn to National socialism (Fascism, i.e., the one, i.e., the dictator) in order to rescue themselves from their agenda—Global socialism. It is therefore imperative that they equate Nationalism, i.e., the individual under God, i.e., the one, i.e., the father/Father and his/His authority to Fascism if they are to initiate and sustain control over the thoughts and the actions of "the people."
The Berlin Wall did not come down because communism was defeated. It came down because communism had succeeded with Global socialists having defeated National socialism, i.e., the old soviet system along with its dictators (equated to Fascism in their mind). Old line Marxists, i.e., traditional communists, following after the dictates of the one, are now replaced with facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists) getting "the people," in all fascists of society—from the day care center to the highest offices in the land—to dialogue their opinions to a consensus, thereby negating the authority of the one, i.e., God, i.e., the father/Father and his/His authority in their thoughts and actions, negating the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process, so they can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity—as we now see taking place in America. Even the "church," i.e., church leadership (using dialogue to 'discover' the truth of the Word of God—making it subject to the opinions of men) is participating.
"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15
The gospel message is about the one (the Son) obeying the one (the Father), calling all to follow him (the one) in doing the same. Socialism, i.e., church growth ("building relationships on common self interests") negates (is antithetical to) the gospel message—making man, i.e., the child's carnal nature, i.e., "self interest," i.e., "the group" the drive and the purpose of life instead of doing the one's, i.e., Father's will. In doing so, through dialogue focusing upon men's' opinions, i.e., how everyone "feels" and what everyone "thinks" mob rule, i.e., what "the group" thinks rules in the thoughts and actions of the "congregation," i.e., "the people," turning them against the Father's authority, i.e., the One.
"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9
"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6
"And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it. For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away? For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy angels." Luke 9:23-26
"For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ." Galatians 1:10
"... and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:3
Denying your "self," i.e., your "self interests," i.e., your "lusts," picking up your cross, i.e., enduring the rejection of "the group," i.e., of men (daily) and following after the One, i.e., the Son Jesus Christ, in obedience to the One, i.e., His Heavenly Father in all things commanded is all negated in dialogue, i.e., in "the group," making the "church" apostate. Fellowship (which is based upon established commands, rules, facts, and truth) is different than relationship (which is based upon your desire for the approval, i.e., affirmation of men). As the "church" goes the nation goes.
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4
What Nationalists are not aware of or addressing, it is the socialists in education that are driving the socialist agenda. Socialists, in control of the classroom, are using the conflicts of the day (the battle between Nationalism and Socialism) to 'change' how the students think and act. By using dialoged in the classroom to solve the conflict they are preparing the next generation to be socialists. The "educator" does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parents authority when they get home from school (if they are not doing that already)—that would be National socialism—all they have to do is have their students dialogue their opinions to a consensus in the classroom and they will do that automatically when they get home from school, doing so without having a guilty conscience, i.e., without having to be told.
"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)
Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the student's "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., their love pleasures and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the child's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation," since the father's/Father's authority, and the guilty conscience which it engenders, is negative to the child's carnal nature), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human-ist resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity.
"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17
Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal desires) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.
"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2019