Marxists Want To Sin.
(Personal note.)

Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

Marxists want to sin in a world (of sinners) where no one will call them a sinner—so they can sin without having a guilty conscience., i.e., without being held accountable. The more people Marxists convince (pressure into accepting, out of fear of group rejection) that sinning, i.e., "human nature" is "OK," i.e., is "normal" (the "norm") the more embolden they become to negate (silence, censor, and remove) anyone who gets in their way, i.e., who does not agree with ('justify') them, i.e., who does not think like them. Karl Marx stated it this way.

"Not feeling at home in the sinful world. Critical Criticism must set up a sinful world in its own home." "Critical Criticism is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without." (Karl Marx, The Holy Family)

In other words: "Not feeling at home" in a world of sinners, calling one another sinners, Karl Marx and those who think like him, through dialogue with their "self" "set up a sinful world in [their] own home [in their imagination, i.e., imagining how the world "ought" to be where they can sin without being called a sinner, i.e., without having a guilty conscience]." Through dialogue with one another, 'justifying' their sins, Marxists 'justify their hatred toward anyone who calls them a sinner, 'justifying' their negating (killing) them without having a guilty conscience. It is one thing to have a guilty conscience for sinning (repentance is still a possibility). It is another to sin without having a guilty conscience. In the latter you can do unconscionable ("abominable") things, 'justifying' your removing (negating) anyone who gets in your way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous—without having a guilty conscience (with impunity, i.e., with no fear of judgment, i.e., no accountability for your actions—in your mind).

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)

In dialogue there is no sin. There is only the carnal thoughts of the child, "intolerant of any influence from without."

"The individual may have 'secret' thoughts ["lusts"] which he will under no circumstances reveal to anyone else if he can help it [out of fear of being judged, rejected, and/or punished]. To gain access [through getting him or her to dialogue, i.e., to share his or her "feelings," i.e., carnal desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' (that he is internally, i.e., privately struggling with) with others] is particularly important, for here may lie the individual's potential [for 'change,' i.e., to become of and for his or her "self" and the world only'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority]." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)

Any time you hear the phrase "Be positive, Not negative" you are listening to a Marxist (whether they know it or not) telling you to let them wallow in their sins without you (the truth) getting in their way, i.e., giving them a guilty conscience. They will turn and rend you (whatever it takes) if you persist (using "the group" to do it for them)—doing so without having a guilty conscience. And you thought Marxism was all about politics.

"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

Your heart is "deceitful ("deceitful above all things") thinking pleasure, i.e., "lust" is the 'purpose' of life instead of doing the father's/Father's will, making you wicked ("desperately wicked") in your effort to negate the father's/Father's authority that gets in your way. You can not see your heart as being wicked because your "lust" for pleasure (your "lust" for "lust") is standing in the way. Karl Marx is in your heart, waiting for you to 'justify' him, i.e., your "self" over and therefore against having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in the "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, so you can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, i.e., so you can become like him, i.e., become "self actualized."

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

"lawfulness without law," (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment)

Immanuel Kant wrote of a time where "lawfulness," i.e., the law of the flesh, i.e., "self," i.e., sinning "without law," i.e., without the law of God getting in the way, i.e., without "the people," i.e., the Marxist having a guilty conscience for sinning, would become the law of the land. For that to become "actualized," as Georg Hegel pointed out, the child, i.e., "self" (void of the father's/Father's authority) must be the focus of life. For Immanuel Kant, Georg Hegel, Karl Marx, et al. it is in the child's nature—to "enjoy the present," i.e., to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that "the world" stimulates—where the "actual" resides.

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), "of and for self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') In other words, according to Karl Marx, et al. it is "lust" that "reconciles us to" "the world." It is the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders that gets in the way.

"Self-perfection of the human individual is fulfilled in union with the world in pleasure." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)

For the "actual" ("lust") to become reality (all there is), i.e., for "self" to become "actualized," the father's/Father's authority, that engenders a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that "the world" stimulates must be negated.

"Once the earthly family [with the father in authority] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [with the Father in authority], the former [the father's authority in the home] must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

"... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)

"Experience ["sense experience," i.e., "lust"] is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

"In a democratic society a patriarchal culture [where children/men must humble, deny, die to, control, discipline (capitulate) their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will] should make us depressed instead of glad; it is an argument against the higher possibilities of human nature, of self actualization." "In our democratic society, any enterprise—any individual—has its obligations to the whole [apart from what he has in common with mankind, i.e., "lust" he has no identity, i.e., individualism under God, i.e., the father's/Father's authority no longer counts]." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)

"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Rogers)

"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [their parent's/God's authority aka the father's/Father's authority (system—the idea being do not attack the father himself while he is in power but attack, i.e., exclude the system of thought he uses in "helping" the children make decisions regarding right and wrong behavior and thought themselves, then he can not accuse you of attacking him until it is to late, i.e., he no longer has power, i.e., his own children (and the community) no longer support his way of thinking and acting]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost [anyone standing in the way of "lust," i.e., in the way of "human nature" is then the enemy of "the people"]." (Abraham Maslow, The Further Reaches of Human Nature)

It is in the father's/Father's authority we learn we will be held accountable for our carnal thoughts and carnal actions, i.e., for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that "the world" stimulates. Negate the father's/Father's authority and all man has is his "self" and the world that stimulates pleasure ("lust") in him, 'justifying' the negation of anyone who gets in the way of his "lusts"—including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous. Doing so (sinning) without having a guilty conscience.

"... the central problem is to change reality.… reality with its 'obedience to laws.'" (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

"... I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." Romans 7:7

If you reject the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "rule of law," "lust" will swallow you up, i.e., "lust" will make you a servant to it. You can not control "lust." "Lust" controls you. Being intoxicated with, addicted to, and possessed by it, chasing after it you will sacrifice all you have for it, including your soul. Marxists and psychologists have this in common, their 'justification' of sin, i.e., of "lust," i.e., of "human nature" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority.

"Marxian theory needs Freudian-type instinct theory to round it out. And of course, vice versa." "Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions ['liberation' of "self" from the father's/Father's authority] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [submission of "self" to the father's/Father's authority] stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)

Marxism/psychology began in the garden in Eden where the first/master facilitator of 'change' "helped" two "children" 'liberate' their "self" from the Father's authority. It was in that 'moment' where both the Marxist and psychologist derive their profession.

"To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit;" (Brown)

"If the guilt accumulated in the civilized domination of man by man can ever be redeemed by freedom, then the 'original sin' must be committed again: 'We must again eat from the tree of knowledge in order to fall back into the state of innocence.'" (Marcuse)

Marxism is based upon the premise that since the guilty conscience is engendered by the law and the law is engendered by the father's/Father's authority, only by negating the father's/Father's authority, thereby negating the law, can the guilty conscience for breaking the law, i.e., for disobeying the father/Fathers be negated, allowing the Marxist to sin without having a guilty conscience. Since the Marxist perceives his "self" as being the personification of "the people" anyone accusing "the people" of sinning, exposing their sins, engendering a guilty conscience in "the people" must be negated. Without "the people's" "lusts" the Marxist, the psychologist has no identity with "the people," therefore he has no power, no control over "the people."

"No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Matthew 6:24

"Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" Romans 6:16

"And through covetousness [your "lusts"] shall they with feigned words ["plastic words"] make merchandise of you [turn you into "human resource" in order (as in "new" world order) to use you for their own carnal pleasures ("lusts") and gain, casting you aside (as something worthless, i.e., of no value) when you get in their way, as you did God the Father (and your earthly father) when He (he) got in yours]." 2 Peter 2:3

"He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son." 1 John 2:22

"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9

"... and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:3

The Lord, Jesus Christ did not come to negate the Father's authority. He came to do the Father's will instead, calling all to follow him doing the same.

"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6

By negating the father's authority in the home, making "human relationship" the agenda instead, the Marxist, psychologist is able to negate the father's/Father's authority system in the children's thoughts and actions.

"And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11

Once separated from the father's/Father's authority (the children no longer finding their identity in him/Him), in desperation, the children will, with the "help" of the facilitator of 'change' find their identity in themselves and the facilitator of 'change.' Discussion retains the father's/Father's authority, i.e., in a discussion the father/Father has the final say ("Because I said so."/"It is written."). In dialogue, as in an opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority. There is only the children's (and the facilitator of change's, i.e., the Marxist's-psychologist's) carnal desires, i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. Dialogue, which unites upon common "lusts" is therefore their language of choice, not discussion which divides upon right and wrong.

"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making [replacing discussion, which retains the father's/Father's authority system, with dialogue, which negates it] our objective centers upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

"Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." 2 Thessalonians 2:3-10

"We know how to change the opinions of an individual in a selected direction, without his ever becoming aware of the stimuli which changed his opinion." "We know how to influence the ... behavior of individuals by setting up conditions which provide satisfaction for needs of which they are unconscious, but which we have been able to determine." "If we have the power or authority to establish the necessary conditions, the predicted behaviors [our potential ability to influence or control the behavior of groups] will follow." "We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalizing them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood."
'...we can be more deliberate and hence more successful in our cultural design. We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do." "By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behavior—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises." (Rogers) emphasis added.

By 'discovering' (through dialogue) your carnal desires, i.e., what you secretly "lust" after, i.e., what you "covet," psychologists, i.e., Marxists, as predators, charlatans, pimps, pedophiles are able to seduce, deceive, and manipulate you, i.e., use you for their own carnal pleasures and gain without having a guilty conscience. Seducing you into their snare by encouraging you to share your "self interest," i.e., your "lusts," i.e., what you "covet" in a "positive," "safe" ("Thou shalt not surely die") place/space/zone" they are able to deceive you into trusting them (since they have your "self interest," i.e., your "lusts" in mind—as the master facilitator of 'change,' i.e., psychologist-Marxist did the woman in the garden in Eden). They are then able to manipulate you, as one of Thorndike's chickens, Skinner's rats, Pavlov's dog into serving them (supporting their "lusts") on demand. Treating you as "human resource" they can use you for their own carnal pleasures ("lusts") and gain, casting you aside when you no longer bring them pleasure (or someone "better" comes along) or you get in their way. Doing so without having a guilty conscience. With you affirming ('justifying') them, i.e., serving, protecting, praising, and worshiping them, they have succeeded in programing you (or the police, the military, doctors and nurses, etc.,) to willing negate anyone who gets in their way—without you (or the police, military, doctors and nurses, etc.,) having a guilty conscience. To become "self-actualized," i.e., to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates (without having a guilty conscience) you must sell your soul to the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., to the psychologist-Marxist. The moment he gets you into dialogue (into revealing your "lusts") when it comes to right and wrong behavior he "owns" you, i.e., he "owns" your soul. You gave it to him in exchange for a life of "lust," where you can sin (be a Marxist) without having a guilty conscience—until judgment day. In your effort to preserve your "self," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' you have chosen where you will spend eternity—with the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the psychologist, i.e., the Marxist in the lake of fire that is never quenched. 

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2021