"Justifying" abortion, euthanasia, etc.
by the self-environmental dialectical homo-stasis praxis

Dean Gotcher

    "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live." John 5:24, 25

    Changing an "I knowing" (belief) into an "I thinking" (theory/opinion) is a paradigm shift from life to death. With the shift you can justify the persecution or killing of anyone who brings about a dialectical split of the self-environment praxis (social unity, world peace).

    For example, humanists know that natural law reveals "Every human being began life in this same way, with a single ovum being fertilized by a single sperm cell to form a zygote." yet they can "justify" killing "human life" for pleasure.  Quotation source: Canadian Institutes of Health Research The Brain From Top to Bottom. By "rationally" calling "human life" "fetus, tissue," in the appropriate time and setting, it ("human life") can be "justifiably" aborted when "human life" (their own words as sited above) interferes with another person's pleasures, or "It will be a burden upon society and its pleasure,"―avoid pain, approach pleasure, first in mind, then in practice.    This is  done by those who constantly cry out for "justice"―socialist justice, where self and environment must be united in thought and in practice i.e. in theory ,"We think  . . . ," justified in practice, "We can . . . ," for the betterment of all

    What traditionally would be called a crime can now be called a "necessary" procedure. This used to be called Communism―barbarism. A system that killed its own citizens, in mass, for the "common good." 

    It is all in the procedure you use which helps you define who is a citizen and who (what) is not worth keeping around. Once the individual self unites with the environment and the dialectical split is overcome―the restrainer-inhibiter is removed―the environment―the collective self, the "group think―will decide what to do with the individual self when it (now defined as an it) is perceived as interfering with the self-environment dialectical praxis―the self actualized homo-stasis life.  The "We think" can perceive the self as an it and in "good conscience" get rid of "it."

    Life was first recognized as beginning in the zygote, then it was recognized as beginning in the emotions, it is now being recognized as beginning in self consciousness, some day, coming soon to your neighborhood, it will be recognized only in the collective consciousness.  If you are not recognized (marked) for approval by the self-environmental dialectical praxis―the consensus, you will not be able to buy or sell.  Nobody will force you to do it, you will do it for yourself, because you "thought" in yourself and you refused to know God, who chastens those he loves, and you refused to obey his commands, which require you to deny and humble your self―ouch! such pain of social rejection.

    "We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled, though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do. . . .  By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behavior the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises." Carl Rogers On becoming a person (underlined emphasis in the original, bolded emphasis added)

    The truth be known, in the face of the social rejection it is freedom to know Him and his peace. This is the praxis of the martyrs.

"Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid." John 14:27

"If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed." John 8:36

John Chapter 8 I consider this to be one of the most violent chapters in the biblebetween Jesus and those who praxis this process. "Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by." John 8:59

Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2006-2015