If I Gain Access To Your "Self-Interest" I Own You.
"And through covetousness shall they with feigned words [plastic words, Gr., i.e., doublespeak, i.e., saying one thing while meaning another, i.e., giving you what you want to hear in order to gain your trust thereby being able to, through dialogue, i.e., seduction, deception, and manipulation move you down their pathway] make merchandise of you." 2 Peter 2:3
"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16
If I, through dialogue gain access to your "self-interest," i.e., to what you "covet," gaining your trust, I can seduce, deceive, and manipulate you, i.e., own you as "human resource," i.e., use you for my own pleasure and gain, casting you aside as some "road-kill" when you not longer give me pleasure or get in my way with your approval since you, in your "self-interest," i.e., your "covetousness," through dialogue with others gained their trust, seduced, deceived, and manipulated them as "human resource," i.e., owned them, used them for your own pleasure and gain, casting them aside as some "road-kill" when they no longer gave you pleasure or got in your way. "Building relationship" with others on "self interest," i.e., covetousness will cost you your life, with someone else being able to buy and sell you, i.e., your soul as "human resource," i.e., as "merchandise," casting you aside as "road-kill" when you no longer give them pleasure or get in their way.
"We know how to change the opinions of an individual in a selected direction, without his ever becoming aware of the stimuli which changed his opinion." "We know how to influence the ... behavior of individuals by setting up conditions which provide satisfaction for needs of which they are unconscious, but which we have been able to determine." "If we have the power or authority to establish the necessary conditions, the predicted behaviors [our potential ability to influence or control the behavior of groups] will follow." "We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalizing them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood." "'Now that we know how positive reinforcement works [dialoguing opinions to a consensus, i.e., dialoguing our feelings (our "self interests," i.e., our carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., what we covet—it is not covetousness if you can walk away from it) to a feeling of oneness ('discovering' through dialogue the common carnal desires that we can all agree on, thereby affirming ourselves, and working together, as one, in fulfilling them, we establish our carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., our "self" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the father's/Father's restraints, i.e., the father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth)], and why negative doesn't' [the father's/Father's authority to 1) give us commands, rules, facts, and truth which go counter to and therefore restrain our carnal desires of the 'moment,' 2) reward us or bless us when we do what is right and obey, 3) chasten us when we do wrong and disobey, that we might learn to do right and not wrong and obey and not disobey, 4) discuss with us any questions we might have (at his discretion), and 5) cast out those who disrespect i.e. who question and/or challenge his/His authority, i.e., who reject his/His restraints]... 'we can be more deliberate and hence more successful in our cultural design. We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled [the manipulated] though they are following a code much more scrupulously [more government regulations and oversight (sight based management)] than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do. That's the source of the tremendous power of positive reinforcement—there's no restrain and no revolt. By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behavior—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
By redefining the soul, defining it as cognitive, affective, and psychomotor, i.e., "knowing" by "sensuous needs," "sense perception," and "sense experience" only, i.e., making "knowing" subject to "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life" only, making it subject to stimulus-response, i.e., to that which is "of the world" only, those "of the world" are able to negate your soul—that knows by being told. Thus, through the use of dialogue, they are able to grade you, i.e., determine your "mental health"—based upon your response to their testing method. By placing you in an environment of permissiveness where you can be your "self" without fear of judgment, condemnation, or being cast out, which 'liberates' your "self interest," i.e., your covetousness, i.e., your "lusts"—where if your "feelings" are directing your steps you will participate, i.e., you are willing to be your "self," but if your fear of judgment, condemnation, or being cast out for being wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" predominates, i.e., you have a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting," i.e., the father's/Father's authority directs your steps you will not participate, even fighting against it (the permissive environment that is)—your "mental health" is determined. The former response, i.e., "lusting" after, i.e., coveting the things of the world, including the affirmation of men makes you "good" (merchandise). The latter response, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will makes you "bad" (merchandise, not buyable or sellable)—revealing "neurosis," i.e., the need for more therapy, preventing you from holding any position of importance in society until you "get better" (which will probably be never). Having been 'labeled' as "neurotic," i.e., mentally ill even once dooms you for the rest of your life. Who can really trust you from then on. "Better keep an eye on you."—just in case you slip back into your old ways. It is what "sight based management" is all about.
"Obedience and compliance are hardly ideal goals." "It was the view of the group that educational objectives stated in the behavior form have their counterparts in the behavior of individuals, observable and describable therefore classifiable [true science defines laws as "repeatable" (established) not "describable" (which makes them subject to 'change')]." "Only those educational programs which can be specified in terms of intended student behaviors can be classified." "What we are classifying is the intended behavior of students—the ways in which individuals are to act, think, or feel as the result of participating in some unit of instruction." (Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1: Cognitive Domain)
"The individual may have 'secret' thoughts ["lusts"] which he will under no circumstances reveal to anyone else if he can help it [out of fear of being judged, rejected, and/or punished]. To gain access [through getting him or her to dialogue, i.e., to share his or her "feelings," i.e., desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' with others] is particularly important, for here may lie the individual's potential [for 'change,' i.e., to become of and for his or her "self" and the world only—'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority]." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)
"Persons will not come into full partnership in the process until they register dissatisfaction [with authority]." (Kenneth D. Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)
"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
"Blooms' Taxonomies"—"a psychological classification system"—is curriculum by which all teachers are certified and schools accredited today, 'liberating' children from their parent's authority by the use of dialogue in the classroom, "helping" the children 'discover' their common "self interest," building relationships based upon their common "lusts," 'creating' a "new" world order where the child's carnal nature, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life" rules void of parental restraints, i.e., void the father's/Father's authority, where facilitators of 'change' then control the world, using the children as "human resource," i.e., "merchandise" for their own pleasure and gain.
"The Taxonomy will provide a bridge ... between teachers and evaluators, ... psychologists, ... behavioral scientists." "'Folklure' [parent's standards, i.e., parental authority, i.e., the Father's authority] …can be replaced by ... affective behaviors [the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lust"]." "Bloom's Taxonomies" are all about "ordering" "different kinds of affective behavior," i.e., "the range of emotion(s)" "organized into value systems and philosophies of life." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)
The purpose of education, according to Benjamin Bloom is "to develop attitudes and values toward learning which are not shaped by the parents." (Book 2: Affective Domain) According to Benjamin Bloom, it is in creating a "healthy" environment in the classroom, where children can be their "self," without fear of judgment, condemnation, being cast out for being wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting," i.e., coveting that "healthy" children are 'created.' By placing their "feelings," i.e., their affective domain, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., covetousness over and therefore against their parent's authority, i.e., the father's/Father's authority children can be 'liberated' to become their "self," i.e., "of the world" only, negating "neurosis," i.e., having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting," i.e., for coveting, i.e., for being "human" in the process.
"The affective domain ["the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., covetousness] is, in retrospect, a virtual 'Pandora's Box' [a "box" full of evils, which once opened, can not be closed].' It is in this 'box' that the most influential controls are to be found." "In fact, a large part of what we call "good teaching" is the teacher's ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the student's fixed beliefs and getting them to discuss issues." (Book 2: Affective Domain)
"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (Book 2: Affective Domain)
By gaining access, through dialogue to your children's "self interest," 'discovering' what they covet, those of the world can turn your children into "human resource," i.e., into "merchandise" so they (having turned your children against you and your authority) can use them for their own pleasure and gain. They, through the use of dialogue, can do the same thing with you, your spouse, your boss, your legislators, your judges, your leaders, and even your minister. The objective today is to "prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space," so all people, "lusting," i.e., coveting after the things of the world can become "human resource," i.e., "merchandise." (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future) If anyone, through dialogue gains access to your "lusts," i.e., to your carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., to what you covet they own you. It is in your covetousness, i.e., in your "self interest," i.e., in our carnal desires of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, i.e., in dialogue you become merchandise to (in the eyes of) those of the world— who, through getting you into dialogue are able to seduce, deceive, and manipulate you as "human/material resource" so they can use you for their own carnal pleasures and gain, casting you aside as some "road-kill" when you no longer serve their purpose or get in their way. Without covetousness, i.e., dialogue, i.e., you 'justifying' your "self," i.e., your "lusts" before men they can not "own" you.
"Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee. So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me." Hebrews 13:5, 6
"Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because he trusteth in thee." Isaiah 26:3
"And having food and raiment let us be therewith content." 1 Timothy 6:8
"Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." 2 Thessalonians 2:3-10
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4
Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.
"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17
Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.
"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020