Dean Gotcher

By replacing discussion with dialogue the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience which it engenders is negated, allowing the children to do wrong, disobey, sin (be their "self") with impunity, i.e., allowing the children to do wrong, disobey, sin (be their "self") without having a guilty conscience.

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

Discussion carries with it doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth—indicative of the father's/Father's "top-down," "do right not wrong" authority system. Dialogue makes us "feel good" and "equal" according to our carnal nature, 'justifying' our carnal desires and dissatisfactions ("self interests") of the 'moment,' i.e., 'justifying' our love of ("lust" for) the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation), which the world stimulates and our hate of restraint, i.e., "how we feel" (our affective domain) and "what we are thinging" (our opinion)—indicative of the child's carnal nature. By replacing discussion (facts and truth) with dialogue ("feelings") the father's/Father's authority is negated (there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue since all must suspend, as upon a cross, any command, rule, fact, or truth that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks dialogue). The guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders) is negated as well (replaced with the "super-ego," which is sympathetic to our carnal desires). Thus all can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity, i.e., without having a guilty conscience. It is just that simple.

"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin, A Dynamic Theory of Personality: Selected Papers) It is the father's/Father's authority (threat of judgment, i.e., being chastened or casting out) that engenders a guilty conscience ("negative valence") in the child (when he is thinking about doing, doing, or has done what he wants (is tempted) to do what is wrong, according to the father's commands, rules, facts, and truth. If the child can be placed in a "safe zone/space/place," i.e., a "positive" environment where he can, through dialogue, share his opinion, i.e., i.e., his "feelings," i.e., his carnal desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment,' especially with other children (without fear of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., judgment and condemnation, i.e., being chastened or cast out), the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning is negated, allowing him (along with the rest of the children) to do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., be their "self" with impunity

Since the father's/Father's authority, and the guilty conscience which it engenders, does not naturally disappear on its own—children grow up becoming parents themselves using the father's/Father's authority on their own children—it is therefore imperative (according to those of and for the so called "New" World Order) that psychologists, "group psychotherapists," facilitators of 'change,' Transformational Marxists (using "Bloom's Taxonomies") create a "group grade" environment in order to 'liberate' the children, i.e., the children's thoughts and actions from the father's/Father's authority. By seducing, deceiving, and manipulating everyone present into dialoguing their opinions to a consensus (affirmation) agents of 'change' (change agents) are able to get everyone to negate the father's/Father's authority in their communication with one another, so they can all do wrong, disobey, sin (be their "self") with impunity, i.e., so the can do wrong, disobey, sin (be their "self") without having a guilty conscience. (See Why? for more information on How?)

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2019