Hoof And Mouth Disease.
(Personal note.)

Dean Gotcher

In the day (things may be different today) when a rancher found some of his herd had hoof and mouth disease he had to drive his herd into a corral, dig a pit, line it with lime, herd the cattle into it, shoot them, cover them with lime, bury them and mark the area so no one in the future would break through the barrier, covering with lime (as was possible) any area the diseased animals had occupied to prevent it from being spread to the next herd. My father inherited our farm from my grandfather (via my grandmother) and in his enthusiasm, as any new property owner, cleaned the barn floor down to the original clay. Not knowing grandfather had cattle he had to kill because of their acquiring hoof and mouth disease, breaking through the lime barrier grandfather had put over the original clay floor, my father, needless to say lost his herd to the same disease.

Now to the story.

There was a rancher who owned a large herd, in a certain territory. Discovering some of his cattle had acquired hoof and mouth disease he corralled them, separating them from the rest of his herd, but instead of following the proscribed method of control he shipped them off to the cattle yard for sale, paying off the health inspector, convincing the other ranchers who bought them they were healthy, destroying the other ranchers in the territory—so he could acquire control over the market, buying up much of the territory. The question is, will he be held accountable for his wicked deed? Not if he can pay off or intimidate the prosecuting lawyers, the judge, and the jury.

Think Wuhan, China, the Communist Chinese Government, and the world court. Every person who has died and will die from the Wuhan, China virus, outside of China, is no different a victim (dead) than if a Communist Chinese soldier had killed them in person, the end result (and the intended purpose) is the same. This is not to suggest the sick be rounded up and shot but because of the seriousness of the virus be isolated from the rest of the public until it could be brought under control. To isolate it from your nation while sending it around the world is a crime.

By the courts using the consensus process, i.e., the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process, all that will result from their crime is being told to do things "better" the next time. That is a crime in itself.

"Jurisprudence of terror takes two forms; loosely defined rules which produces unpredictable law, and spontaneous changes in rules to best suit the state [those in power]." (R. W. Makepeace and Croom Helm, Marxist Ideology and Soviet Criminal Law)

"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making, our objective centers upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

The outcome of the consensus process is always the facilitator of 'change's' desired outcome, affirmed by your participation. To participate is to affirm the outcome. There is no sovereignty in the consensus process. There is only the desired outcome of the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the negation of sovereignty, affirmed by your participation.

"For to accept that solution [where all citizens, including parents, must participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., stop telling one another they are wrong—in order to build relationship with one another (based upon "feelings," i.e., upon everyone's carnal desires, i.e., upon everyone's "self interest" of the 'moment')], even in theory, would be tantamount to observing society from a class standpoint [from the child's perspective, i.e., from the child's carnal nature] other than that of the bourgeoisie [from the parent's authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority]. And no class can do that-unless it is willing to abdicate its power freely [chose relationship with those who are wrong instead of holding them accountable for doing wrong—correcting, reproving, chastening them when they do wrong, casting them out when they reject, i.e., question, challenge, deny, disregard, attack right-wrong thinking, i.e., the father's/Father's authority]." (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

In other words, for Karl Marx et al. "lust reconciles you to the world," requiring the negation of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., sovereignty in order for it, i.e., "self-actualization" to come into praxis.

"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)

"The philosophy of praxis ["self actualization," i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., negation of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., negation of "can not," "must not," "Thou shalt not," "Because I said so," "It is written," "Thou shalt surely die" in the child's/person's thoughts and therefore actions] is the absolute secularization of thought, an absolute humanism of history." (Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks)

To 'create' a world of "ought" you must negate that which "is," creating a "new" world order where "is" is you "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation an/or people are stimulating, 'liberated' from restraint, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders.

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory) It is in dialogue we discover our commonality with one another, i.e., our common "self interests" in each other, 'justifying' our "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., what which we have in common, i.e., that which is "of the world" only.

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

The only thing that comes out of the consensus process is the 'justification' of "self," i.e., the 'justification' of "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," in the process negating the father's/Father's authority (sovereignty) and the guilty conscience it engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, so the Karl Marx in you can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, with the affirmation of "the people," i.e., with impunity. The dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process is a virus in itself, i.e., a mental virus, blinding men to their deceitful and wicked ways.

"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will], and desperately wicked [hating whoever prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks it from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' it desires]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9 You can not see your "heart" as being deceitful and wicked because your love of "self," i.e., your love of pleasure, i.e., "lust" is standing in the way blinding you to your hate. Not until you humble, deny, die to your "self," i.e., the Karl Marx in your heart can you see your "heart" as being deceitful and wicked, i.e., "desperately wicked," loving pleasure and hating restraint.

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

Man's "hoof and mouth" disease is his running after the carnal pleasures, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, 'justifying' his "self," i.e., his "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating with one another. There is no other reason for man's use of the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process than man's 'justification' of his "hoof and mouth" disease. If you do not take care of the Karl Marx, i.e., the "hoof and mouth" disease in your children, the Karl Marx, i.e., the "hoof and mouth" disease in your children will take care of you.

The road to "Utopia" (the way the world "ought" to be) is paved with the bodies of those who got in the way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous. "The problem" is not in the world, your need to 'change' it in order to make it "better." It is in your heart, your need to repent before the Lord, letting him change it, doing the Father's will instead of yours. Instead of your "hoof and mouth" disease being covered with lime, i.e., the works of men, it is covered by the blood of the lamb, the work of Christ Jesus on the cross, doing his Father's will.

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." 1 John 2:16

"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21

"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9

"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God; not of works, lest any man should boast." Ephesians. 2:8, 9

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020