Freedom Of Speech.

Dean Gotcher

Freedom of speech is being able to speak the truth without being censored. Freedom of speech to a 'liberal' means being able to censor anyone who tells them they are wrong, hurting their "feelings," i.e., making them "feel" bad for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, so they can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity—censoring (silencing) anyone who speaks the truth, doing so without having a guilty conscience.

Whenever someone tells you to "be positive, not negative" they are censoring speech. What they are saying is "Make me 'feel' 'good,'  like God (since only God is good), and I will listen to you." "Hurt my 'feelings,' i.e., tell me that I am not "good," i.e., not God and I not listen to you." "If you, being 'negative' 'hurt' my (or other's) 'feelings' you must to be censored (silenced) so I (and they) can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity, i.e., without having a guilty conscience." The greatest enemy of those who preach being "positive and not negative" is the truth. Knowing the truth comes from being told, which deals with the soul. By making knowing subject to the flesh, i.e., "sense experience," and the world that stimulates it, being told must be replaced (silenced) with being asked "how do you 'feel'" and "what do you 'think'" making your "self" the medium from/through which to know the 'truth,' making 'truth' subjective.

You discuss commands, rules, facts, truth, wanting to do (or be right) and not wrong according to them. You dialogue your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "self interests" of the 'moment' which the world stimulates (which is "positive"), which includes your resentment toward restraint (toward that which is "negative"). In order (as in "old" world order) to KNOW right from wrong, according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth you must suspend, as upon a cross, your "feelings," i.e., your "self interests," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment,' doing so in order to hear and receive the truth. In order (as in "new" world order) to know what is right ("positive") and what is wrong ("negative") according to your carnal desires, i.e., your "self interest," i.e.,  your"feelings" of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, you must suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of dialogue, silencing anyone preaching, teaching, and discussing the truth so you can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity. When it comes to KNOWING right from wrong according to the truth you must have a discussion. Those who insist upon dialogue can only know the 'truth' according to their carnal nature, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, having to silence anyone who insist upon discussion, so they can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity. There is no absolute right or wrong (either-or) in dialogue, there is in a discussion. How we "fill the empty space," with discussion (commands, rules, facts, and truth) or dialogue (our "feelings" of the 'moment'), reveals who has to be silenced in order to KNOW/know the truth/'truth.'

"prevent[ing] someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future)

"In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) In discussion you have to suspend, as upon a cross your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "self interests" of the 'moment' in order to hear and receive the truth.

"A Dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) In dialogue you have to suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of (that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks) dialogue, i.e., your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "self interests" of the 'moment,' which includes your desire for the approval of others—affirming your carnal nature.

To have freedom of speech you must have discussion, silencing dialogue when it comes to doing (or being) right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Dialogue silences discussion, negating the truth for the sake of your "lusts," i.e., your carnal desires,  i.e., your "self interests" of the 'moment.'

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the student's "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., their love pleasures and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the child's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation," since the father's/Father's authority, and the guilty conscience which it engenders, is negative to the child's carnal nature), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human-ist resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal desires) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2019