A spiraling process of 'changingness.'
by Dean Gotcher
(December, 2010)
revised 09-14-11
(Click on charts below for a larger view, some with explanations
added.)
"Positive" Environment:
1. Nervous system comes into contact with a gratifying
object in the environment.
2, 3. The neurotransmitter Dopamine (C8H11NO2) is emancipated into the synaptic gap of the nervous system of the body and brain, producing a 'wanting' of the gratifying object which is in the environment.
4. Looking into the environment to find and acquire the gratifying object which stimulated Dopamine emancipation. It is not the neurotransmitter Dopamine itself which is at issue here. It is the emancipation of Dopamine into the synaptic gap as a result of the nerve endings having come into contact―physically or visually―with a gratifying object, which then naturally stimulates its emancipation, which then leads to the mental-physical response, i.e. the "want" to locate, know, and relate with the source, i.e. to find and know 'first cause,' i.e. be at-one-with that which is of the physical environment (the world), which engenders pleasure.
5. Thinking upon the object which stimulated Dopamine emancipation triggers thinking upon how to acquire the gratifying object (control the environment) for more Dopamine emancipation.
6. Making changes in the body ('motion' to approach gratifying object) and changes in the environment ('motion' to remove obstacles to the acquisition of the object). See Dopamine chart below for more detail.
Acquisition of the gratifying object entails
"controlling" the
environment
(called "environment control," "climate control") to continue the stimulation of
Dopamine emancipation.
The person is not in love with the object which stimulates
Dopamine emancipation, he is in love with the emancipated Dopamine which the
object stimulates. He just wants to control the gratifying object (the
environment) for more
Dopamine
emancipation. The object,
in and of itself, can not produce 'change,' i.e. a sensuous
at-one-ness with the person and itself, it can only, like art, stimulate
'change,' i.e. stimulate Dopamine emancipation, which draws the person
to become at-one-with it in the 'moment.' Sensuousness is
what unites the person and the object as one, in the 'moment of change,'
where emotion and motion are united as one in thought and in action (praxis).
Sensuously, we can not change people, we can only initiate and sustain
an environment (a "positive" environment of pleasure or
hope of pleasure or a
"negative"
environment of pain or threat of pain) which stimulates within the person a desire to
'change' (to approach or avoid, to accept or reject, to maintain or
destroy what "is," i.e. where the value or worth of something
or someone is based upon the satisfaction or dissatisfaction they bring
into the situation, i.e. what they bring or have the potential of
bringing into our lives or the lives of
others, their augmenting or inhibiting/blocking of our sense
engendered desires ("wants") of the 'moment' or imagined future, i.e. how things
'ought' to be, i.e. dissatisfaction 'driving' the desire for
'change,' and 'human reasoning' 'justifying' the
'purpose' for 'change,' i.e. 'human reasoning' commencing with doubt and
concluding with vain/sensuous speculations, i.e. opinions and theories.
"Human reasoning," i.e. "sense experience reasoning"
negates faith, negates belief in unchanging/everlasting
truth, being only able to come to 'truth' (concerning 'good' and 'evil,'
'right and 'wrong') through vain speculation, human experience, and
sense based reasoning, making all 'truth' mortal, material,
sensual, engendered by and subject to the world; 1
Timothy 6:20-21,
Ephesians
5:5-7.
This is key
to understanding how the dialectical process of 'changingness' works and how people
are pulled (reasoned: seduced, deceived, and manipulated) into its
practice, i.e. praxis.
The
sensuousness of pleasure (Dopamine emancipation) is the 'drive' and the
'purpose' for Diaprax―the
dialectical process in social praxis (pleasure/abomination not for a few but
for "all"). Dialectically, anything antithetical to the
process of 'change'―motion
(emotion), anything or anyone inhibiting the 'quest' for
"equality of opportunity" in/for pleasure, i.e. "human morality,"
any way of thinking and acting which prevents unity, oneness, wholeness
with Nature (which is the catalyst of 'change,' i.e. pleasure, i.e.
Dopamine emancipation), any way of thinking or acting which requires faith, belief, obedience, and chastening
which 'unnaturally' restrains sensuousness, which prevents
unanimity (oneness) with that which is "practical," any way of
thinking and acting which does not proceed from "sense experience,"
any way of thinking and acting which is 'irrational' and/or
'irrelevant' to sensuousness, must not be tolerated, i.e.
must not be allowed control over the environment, and therefore must be negated. "Tolerance of ambiguity"
is annihilation to faith, belief, obedience and chastening, it is
the negation of the system of righteousness (explained below). "Critical Criticism [questioning
everything] is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus,
intolerant of any influence from without." (Karl Marx,
The Holy Family) bracket information added
The child is not in love with the parent who gives
him the toy nor is he in love with the toy. He is in love with the
Dopamine emancipation (the pleasure) which the parent and/or the toy
stimulate.
Therefore control of the environment, i.e. influencing the parent to
acquire the toy and/or personal access to the
toy whenever he 'wants' it, i.e. his sense perceived "need"
of it, is essential for the
'purpose' of Dopamine emancipation in the child. Eventually
words or sounds, pictures (images, internal & external) or remembering a
past experience, enjoying a present experience, and/or imagining a future
experience can
stimulate Dopamine emancipation without the original object of
gratification being
present.
This is the heart and 'soul' of dialectical love, i.e. the
love of self and the things of this world, i.e. the love which is of the
flesh of man, the love of Dopamine emancipation. It is not the
love which is from God. God's love is of His Spirit, loving the
world, sending his only begotten son to redeem whoever believes upon
him, redeeming them from condemnation, i.e. from eternal death (John
3:16). God's love is not vain, driving by Dopamine emancipation,
i.e. "wanting" the things of this world. God does not "need" man's
love or his praise (for man's love and praise is vain, i.e. odious in
his nostrils). He deserves praise, for his love, mercy, and
grace for/towards man (and can only receive it via. His Holy Spirit
dwelling within man, expressing His love and praise through the redeemed
in Christ).
Man's love, for the things of this world, is bound to his
every day "sense experiences" of Dopamine emancipation,
stimulated by the 'gratifying' things of this world. In a 'moment,' the past, the present, and the future can
all be united in a system (in a
system of
sensuousness, i.e.
Romans
7:14-25,
i.e. the system of our body, i.e. our flesh, and our fleshy mind, subject to Dopamine emancipation and the gratifying object
in the environment which stimulated its emancipation).
The past
being Dopamine emancipation stimulated by a gratifying object in the
environment, Dopamine stimulated and emancipated prior to your
mental awareness of it happening (triggering subconscious
impulse,
spontaneity). The present being your
awareness of Dopamine emancipation (pleasure) and your urge (conscious impulse
or inclination) to look into the
environment to locate the gratifying object (or imagine it), which
stimulated Dopamine emancipation, so as to approach and
claim it as your own once it is identified as the source of pleasure
(consciousness).
Since it is your carnal nature to approach pleasure and to avoid pain,
if the object in the environment produces pain you look into the
environment to identify it as the source or potential source of pain so
as to avoid it. The past-present
connection is your awareness of yourself as being an agent of 'change' (sensuousness) in
the changing environment (sensuousness), aware of yourself seeking after objects of
gratification and avoiding objects of pain (self-consciousness).
The
future, in the system of sensuousness, is your ability (your potential) to control (manipulate) the environment
in such a way as to guarantee more Dopamine emancipation for yourself
and, if necessary, for others as well (reasoning). While
inanimate objects (objects which have no mind of their own) usually
require manipulation only, animate objects ('objects' which have a
mind of their own) often require the addition of reasoning: seduction and
deception, to initiate and sustain the 'change'
process (guarantee Dopamine emancipation in the future). Thus
dialectical reasoning (evaluating the past and present
environments and imagining the potential future environment, all in the
'light' of sensuousness, i.e. enlightenment, i.e. illumination) liberates man from
the restraints and limitations of the "past," 'freeing' man so that he
can become subject to the things of this present and future (imagined)
world (a new order of the world, with sensuousness no longer
being restrained by righteousness), a world order 'freeing'
(liberating) man so that he 'can,' with no sense of guilt or
condemnation, set his affections upon the things below, i.e.
sensuousness (rather than upon the things above, i.e.
righteousness), thereby negating
the necessity of
Colossians 3:2.
It is along this 'pain-pleasure' spectrum of consciousness,
self-consciousness, and reasoning that philosophy (and
Diaprax) emerges, that the imagination of men's hearts can be
continuously sensual, i.e. evil, i.e. unrighteous (void of
righteousness and understanding), yet seem to be 'right.' Therefore imagination (internal selective
'sense perception,' i.e. the self is continuously selecting 'appropriate information' which
augments pleasure, i.e. Dopamine emancipation) can take the original objects
place in stimulating Dopamine emancipation―thereby subjectivity replaces
objectivity. From then on, imagination (internal
perception of the gratifying object or another source other than the
original gratifying object, if you are properly conditioned as Pavlov's dogs
were) can stimulate Dopamine emancipation,
'driving' your every thought and action, i.e. turning your subjectivity
back into objectivity, only this time objectivity is turned (sensually
created) into a self-other (nature, material) sense based world
or environment, a world void of any non-sensuous consciousness, a
world void of objective truth, i.e. void of patriarchal truth, i.e. void
of
righteousness (which is antithetical to subjective, i.e. sensuous 'reality,' antithetical
to universal
self-consciousness, equality, practicality, all three being the same
in nature) having now been negated via. dialectical
reasoning―resulting in a world where
"what is 'rational' (sensual) is 'real' (sensual), and
what is 'real' (sensual) is 'rational' (sensual)."
It is in the realm of sensuousness that all men find their
likeness, conversely, it is in the realm of righteousness that
mankind finds unlikeness. It is only with the use of dialectical
reasoning, therefore, that man can liberate the one, sensuousness,
from the sphere of influence of the other, righteousness, and
actualize world unity, i.e. the "'new' world order," which, as you will
see, is not so new. As you will see, the traditional family is the
greatest barrier to dialectical 'liberation,' and therefore the major
obstacle to the creation of a world of peace, justice, equality, and
social harmony. Since it engenders rebellion and revolution
(the sensuous nature of man seeking liberation from the
restraints of righteousness),
righteousness being the restrainer of 'rational sensuousness,' it's
annihilation is the very 'drive' and 'purpose' of the
dialectical process, the 'reason' for
family therapy.
Dopamine emancipation is 'good' ('rational') according to your carnal mind. According to the laws of
your body
(your flesh) and
your
mind (your reasoning) set upon the things of the world (self-consciousness), all things
pleasurable
(which feel 'good') are 'good,' are sensuous, are "positive,"
are 'rational' to
Dopamine emancipation,
i.e. to the person, i.e. to the 'self.'
Thus "positive experience" can
only proceed from
the "immediate" environment (Nature "sense experienced" internally and externally) which stimulates
Dopamine emancipation, or
an imagined environment which has the potential of stimulating Dopamine
emancipation
(that environment being only from Nature as well), i.e. that environment which
you (all people) can naturally
(sensually) relate with both internally (pleasure) and externally (stimulating
pleasure) and
manipulate (mentally and physically―theoretically
and practically) for your own 'purpose,' i.e. the
augmentation of pleasure, i.e. Dopamine emancipation for yourself (self-consciousness,
rebellion, resentment toward the restraints of righteousness, i.e.
dissatisfaction
being the catalyst of philosophy, of thought, of theory, of opinion) and others (reasoning,
revolution, the 'rational' questioning and physical negation of righteousness via. the common action,
practice or praxis of 'rational' sensuousness, i.e.
'self-sensuous justification' between man and nature working for
the common 'good,' i.e. consensus). The dialectical
construct commences with the premise that man is by nature 'good' (all
is of, by, and for the sensuousness of pleasure, i.e. the 'divine
sparks' becoming one, i.e. all are becoming as 'God,' as 'God is
becoming as all, i.e. all are becoming as society, as society is becoming
as all, i.e. all and society are united via. sensuous).
As long as good (and evil) is defined, and thus controlled by a source
(a first cause) greater than the 'goodness' of the common human experience, greater
than the sensuousness of pleasure in the
'moment' (which means good and evil is based upon righteousness
rather than upon sensuousness, upon faith rather than sight), then man, according to Karl Marx
(and Hegel), will continue to be divided
amongst himself, internally, i.e. theoretically, and externally,
i.e. practically. It is only within the common ground of
sensuousness, i.e. Dopamine emancipation being the indicator of
Nature being first
cause, that world unity, i.e. oneness
amongst all mankind, can become actualized, transcending (negating) religion and
doctrine, i.e. negating that which divides (transcending, i.e.
negating, parent's and God who use chastening to initiate
and sustain a
the system of
righteousness, i.e. Hebrews
12:5-11, i.e. making
themselves
first cause).
While man uses the system of righteousness
(which uses the sensuousness of pain, i.e. chastening) to
instruct those under his authority in what is right and what is wrong
(in thought and in action), man is not righteous in and of
himself, being born in the flesh, born with the system of
sensuousness (approach pleasure-avoid pain). "But we are all as
an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we
all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us
away." Isaiah 64:6 Only God is righteous.
Man's righteousness is as a "filthy rag," only using the
system of righteousness for his own pleasure, for his own
gain. "For they [our earthly fathers] verily for a few days
chastened us after their own pleasure; but he [our heavenly father]
for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness."
Hebrews 12:10 Yet without the system of righteousness
being used in the life of the individual, restraining (chastening) the
system of sensuousness, the dialectical system of
reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation
will manifest itself, 'helping' him 'justify' to himself that his
"sense experience," i.e. his "lust of the flesh," his "lust of the
eyes," and his "pride of life," is not evil but 'good,' being normal
human behavior, and that he is 'righteous' in and of himself, according
to his own nature.
Thus, in dialectical thought, unless man is educated ("sense experienced")
upon that which he has in common with all mankind (re-educated) , i.e.
'rationally' approaching that which is "positive," i.e. the sensuousness
of pleasure which is common to all mankind,
he can not overcome that which divides himself from himself, others, and
nature, i.e. he can not overcome that which is "negative,"
i.e. he can not overcome righteousness, i.e. he can not overcome
his guilty conscience for being unrighteousness.
As long as that which divides, i.e. a higher authority which restrains
sensuousness according to its will (engendering a system
of righteousness),
remains in control of the human mind and human experience man will not
be able to unite upon that which he has in common with all of mankind
and nature, sensuousness, i.e. Dopamine emancipation. It is
thus only in the re-educated experience of class consciousness, where a
person becomes
conscious that he is divided against himself (the cognition domain―knowledge and
the affective domains―feelings, are divided against
themselves) because of 'unnatural'
forces of restraint (righteousness inculcating knowledge, i.e.
knowledge from above, using chastening to restrain, i.e. inhibit and
block 'normal human' feelings), and is encouraged (enticed)
into putting that education
(synthesizing the cognition and affective domains) into practice, that he can find liberation, i.e. Dopamine emancipation
for not only himself but for all, where 'good' is 'rationalized' according to man's common
"sensuous needs,"
thus liberating man from a higher authority which restrains his nature
and nature itself from finding oneness, wholeness with the cosmos.
Sensuousness, emancipated thus dialectical reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation, liberates man
from the restraints of righteousness, thus negating "the
Holy Family" (as Karl Marx put it). Marx understood the source of
righteousness (faith, belief, obedience, and chastening) and how to negate it (faith
in God)
in the thoughts and actions of man. By the 'rational'
justification of sensuousness of pleasure (touch, taste, sight, smell, sound,
and the sensuous pleasure of acceptance and approval of, by, and for others)
rather from the sensuousness of pain, i.e. chastening utilized by
parents and God for the cause of righteousness, righteousness would
become subject to sensuousness (approach pleasure - avoid pain). In this way, by uniting the
cognitive and affective domains, i.e. synthesizing 'righteousness'
with sensuousness, the Devil could join the Church (Marx, I am
sure, would not say that, at least openly in public) and help it
grow into a 'sensuously-rational' fraternity, "sensuously driven"
in the "rational purpose" of initiating and sustaining "human
morality," i.e. sensuous morality, democratic morality,
socialist morality, globalist morality (abomination).
Karl Marx wrote regarding 'sensuality':
"The unspeculative Christian also recognizes sensuality as long as it does not assert itself at the expense of true reason, i.e., of faith, of true love, i.e., of love of God, of true will-power, i.e., of will in Christ. Not for the sake of sensual love, not for the lust of the flesh, but because the Lord said: Increase and multiply. It is not sensuality which is presented ..., but mysteries, adventures, obstacles, fears, dangers, and especially the attraction of what is forbidden [Marx, rejecting righteousness, classifies it as sensuality under the top-down control of the righteous, with the sensuous, the non-righteous (the people) falsely perceiving and accepting the righteous, who are sensuous, as being righteous]." "Mystery, as that of educated society, withdraws, it is true, from the antithesis [self-consciousness due to righteousness-sensuousness conflict] into the inner sphere [where reasoning is used to keep the sensuous (the people) under the control of the righteous (the top-down)]. Nevertheless, high society once again has exclusively its own circles [closed society of sensuousness] in which it preserves the holy [righteousness controlling sensuousness for itself]. It is, as it were, the chapel for this holy of holies [the sensuous using the system of righteousness (top-down control) to control sensuousness (the people and their labor) for themselves]. But for people in the forecourt, the chapel itself is the mystery. [The people perceive the closed society of sensuousness who use the system of righteousness (top-down control) to control sensuousness (the people) for themselves, as being righteous] Education, therefore, in its exclusive position is the same thing for the people [perceived as being for the righteous (the top-down)]... as vulgarity [sensuousness (the people)] is for the educated." "Education as yet is unable and unwilling to bring all estates and distinctions into its circle [admitting that the system of righteousness is actually of the system of sensuousness]. Only Christianity and morality [those using the system of righteousness (top-down control) to control the system of sensuousness (the people) for themselves] are able to found universal kingdoms on earth." (Karl Marx, The Holy Family) Bracketed information added to show connection with Gnosticism, i.e. demiurge (top-down god) with Sophia & Satan liberating the people (liberating the "divine sparks" via class consciousness, i.e. men are all individual gods becoming one god as they are helped to free themselves from the one God, 'reasoning' negates faith, belief, obedience, and chastening which 'enslaves' man to the top-down demiurge system of righteousness, and praxis, social action to remove anything or anyone which/who is of a top-down system so that all can come) back into oneness (liberating the praxis of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e. Satan helping man put the dialectical process into praxis in the garden in Eden, from being evil to being 'good').
Thus, according to Marx, it is only in the changing of the
educational experience, changing the learning environment from righteousness
(right-wrong, i.e. preaching and teaching truth and inculcating belief-facts,
based upon faith, belief, obedience, and chastening when necessary to
reinforce faith, belief, and obedience) to sensuousness
(most agree, agree, disagree, most disagree sensuousness, i.e. dialoguing opinions
and practicing theories, i.e. "the tolerance of ambiguity,"
uncertainty, doubts, speculations, questionings, based upon "sense experience"),
that man can be freed from the restraints of righteousness, to be
"free at last, free at last" from that righteousness which
can only come from the Lord Jesus Christ, liberating man from recognizing God,
i.e. the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, as being first cause―"It
is written ..." manifested in the 'earthly
family's" "Because I said so." If you can
get rid of the "Because I said so" in the home then you can get rid of
the "It is
written ... " in the church and thus you can get rid of the system of
righteousness and create a 'new' order of the world built upon
the system of sensuousness, i.e. human-ism).
The 'success' of Diaprax is in the 'changing' of environmental
conditions from
the system of
righteousness (a thesis, "as given," position-"It is
written"
experience, which requires, faith, belief, and
obedience in that which is not of the "immediate,"
sensuous, internal
natural environment, a system restraining, i.e. inhibiting or blocking
Dopamine emancipation via. chastening when necessary―dialectically
"sense perceived" as being counter to, not in harmony with, or
antithetical to
nature, thus super-natural, above nature, Spiritual,
transcending nature) to
the system of
sensuousness ―(which is of the "immediate,"
sensuous, internal-external natural
environment, requiring little or no effort in stimulating Dopamine
emancipation) by (with the help of, i.e.
facilitated by)
the system of
reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation, i.e.
Genesis 3:1-6,
i.e. 'purposed' in liberating
Dopamine emancipation
('rationally' liberating
the system of sensuousness, i.e. synthesizing that which is natural to man
with the world and that which is natural to the world with man, i.e. 'changingness'
based upon sensuousness) from the restraints of the
system of righteousness
(restraining man from that which is natural to and common between man and the world),
liberating man from that which is not of, not in agreement with, and/or
restrains natural behavior―physical,
mentally, and socially (this is the formula for the common-ist "health
care package"). While God changes man's heart (making it
righteous), making it no longer at-one-with the world, Diaprax
'changes' the world (negating the system of
righteousness), so that man's heart can no longer be trusting of
God, so that man no longer fears God and loves his word.
The fear of judgment (accountability to the standards set by the system of
righteousness upon the system of sensuousness, i.e.
the parent's restraints upon, i.e. control over the child's natural
spontaneous and sensuous behavior by the use of force or
threat of force, i.e. through the use of chastening, i.e. pain or fear
of pain, i.e. judgment or fear of judgment, i.e. restraining,
i.e. "suppressing," i.e. "repressing" his natural impulses)
inhibits or blocks the system of 'changingness' (prevents the
system
of sensuousness, i.e. Dopamine emancipation) from taking place
(from being "liberated"). Thus, whoever 'controls'
the environment controls man's perception of the environment, controls
that which stimulates human impulse (man's,
unrestrained, natural lust for Dopamine emancipation), ultimately controls man's behavior.
In Diaprax, while chastening, used to restraining sensuousness,
'justifies' righteousness, liberation from chastening 'justifies'
sensuousness negating righteousness. See
Diaprax Chart below for more detail.
Dopamine emancipation is not value neutral. Whoever controls the
environment which stimulates Dopamine emancipation, (affirms, liberates, emancipates,
and/or augments) man's natural lust for the things of the world, i.e. worldliness, or
restrains
(inhibits or blocks) man's natural lust for the things of the world, controls human behavior
"for good or for evil," based upon which system or paradigm (righteousness-reasoning
or sensuousness-reasoning, i.e. reasoning from
righteousness, i.e. deductive reasoning or reasoning from
sensuousness, inductive reasoning) is in control of the environment. Thus
the intended use of
'Bloom's Taxonomies' in education since the 50's is to produce a
world of 'changingness,' i.e. where the augmentation of a persons
natural lust for the world (where lust is used for the
creation of a "new" order of the world order) is not sin, to be judged
(preached and taught) as evil by a system of righteousness, but rather sin is a
natural ('normal') behavior of all mankind (a product of the
system of sensuousness) which must be liberated in an "open
ended," "non-offensive," dialogic, dialectic environment and augmented
(properly utilized) for/by the system of reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation,
if the 'goodness' (common-ism) of all of mankind is to be actualized. All who
are made subject to Bloom's "Higher Order Thinking Skills" in
morals and ethics (not a true taxonomy of rocks, plants, and animals but
a 'psychological taxonomy,' i.e. a Transformational Marxist, i.e.
Marx-Freud synthesis, i.e. social-psychology curriculum used in almost
all classrooms today, Christian schools included) are programmed to evaluate
'truth'
through their sensuous values (what brings pleasure to them in
the 'light' of their perception of what brings pleasure to all of
mankind) and are thus mentally, emotionally, and socially possessed
with the justification of the system of sensuousness over
and against the system of righteousness. By making
the cognitive domain (knowing, i.e. supporting the system of
righteousness) subject to (or equal with) the affective
domain (feeling, i.e. of the system of sensuousness) by the utilization of the psycho-motor domain (action
or praxis) through role-playing (which liberates the person of
the system of righteousness), the person is no longer
capable to thinking past (outside of) feelings, i.e. sensuousness (their
"sense experience" of Dopamine emancipation, i.e. their psychical
and social environment) as a basis for 'discovering' and 'knowing'
'truth,' i.e. they are 'dumbed down' to where they can no longer think
('reason') outside of social-sensuous consciousness (what does the group or village think),
and are now mentally, emotionally, and physically controlled by what
Karl Marx called the "ether of the brain" (Karl Marx, The Holy
Family) Cognition (knowledge), Affection (feelings), and
Psycho-motor (action) are thus based upon sensuousness. In
this way of thinking and acting, extrapolation, i.e. the use of
inductive reasoning to select 'appropriate' information (reasoning: seduction,
deception, and manipulation), guides interpretation, i.e. the
use of opinions (sensuousness), in influencing translation,
i.e. decoding the language of the 'good life' ('righteousness')
negates the 'old' order of the world (of the system of
righteousness) where translation (knowledge of the truth "as
given" by God or parent), i.e. deductive reasoning, directs (guides and
restraints) interpretation (feelings and opinions) in
extrapolating proper thoughts and actions in the moment. Thus
all thoughts and actions are based upon 'discovering' and 'utilizing'
common human sense experience and common human sense based
reasoning in creating the 'new' order of the world.
This is the heart and soul of democratic ideals (the "tyranny
of the masses"), i.e. social-ist, global-ist, common-ist, human-ist values,
i.e. starting with sensuousness as 'first cause.'
While the traditional (patriarchal) environment restrains Dopamine
emancipation via.
chastening (for doing wrong), i.e. developing the conscience, teaching
values and principles of righteousness, i.e. self-control,
self-discipline (humbling self and denying self) the transformational
(heresiarchal) environment liberates Dopamine emancipation from the system of
righteousness via. dialoguing to consensus, i.e. developing
the super-ego, teaching 'values' and 'principles' of sensuousness,
i.e. self-esteem, group-esteem. Whoever control the environment
control the hearts and souls of the next generation, for good or for
evil, for righteousness sake (life) or for sensuousness
sake (sin and death). One is by faith (righteousness), the
other is by sight (sensuousness).
"For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 1:26
"Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous. He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil." I John 3:7-8 Romans 6
This is why the control of the (classroom, meeting, town
hall, church board, court room, etc.) environment, by the system of
reasoning: seduction
(mentally focusing on sensuousness, mediating to common ground), deception (negating
judgment and accountability to higher authority, pre-selecting "appropriate information,"
i.e. removing righteous, i.e. truth, and leaving sensuous,
i.e. opinion information,
to guarantee desired outcome i.e. deceiving and lying), and
manipulation (the facilitation process of 'rationally
justifying' sensuousness over and against righteousness,
basing decisions upon social worth), is 'necessary' if 'changingness'
(liberation from judgment and the fear of judgment by parents or
God, i.e. setting standards above the 'immediate' sense based
human nature) is to emerge
'victorious' over unchangingness (continuing accountability to
higher authority, i.e. parents or God), if the potential for
"unsuppressed" Dopamine emancipation (humanism and abomination) is to become actualized
(the "lawless one" is to rule), if "self-actualization"
is to be realized (if the "avoid pain - approach pleasure," pain-pleasure
spectrum, theory-practice unity, is to negate the "obey and be
bless - disobey and be cursed," righteousness-unrighteousness duality,
belief-action dichotomy). In Diaprax there is no "us and
them," there is only "us." In Diaprax "them" is negated
(perceived as 'irrational' and thus treated as 'irrelevant') in the
"win-win," consensus outcome. When
Diaprax is initiated and sustained, the spiraling process of
'changingness' (the liberation of sensuousness, i.e. the
liberation of carnality and abomination, from the restraint of
righteousness, i.e. from the restraint of parents, God, and the
conscience) becomes the pathway of 'life' (the way of doing business)
in a "'new' world order." In that "new" order of the
world (new arrangement of the world where righteousness is
negated in setting policy, making decision) no one can buy or sell without the use of Diaprax.
All citizens are guilty until 'proven' (created) innocent through their praxis
(participation in and support of the process). The dross of
the dialectical process (which is purged out in the consensus
meeting) is righteousness. All values are
Diaprax values (sensuous values where "sense experience"
alone determines worth or value).
No one (or thing) is of value or worth outside of its praxis.
When the process is boiled down to its essence, the chastening of a child
for his unrighteous behavior (according to the parent's standards or
God's commands), for
example, when done in the publics eye, is
disapproved of (or outlawed) because it reminds (or informs) the general public of its sin (or
reminds it of its
sensuous, i.e. unrighteous nature, which it loves, i.e. considers
'good') and its
ultimate accountability to God (which it does not want to be reminded
or informed of, i.e. not wanting to retain God in or apply His Word to its knowledge―this
is the construct of Gnosticism). In this way of thinking and acting, good (God
and His demand for righteousness) is turned into evil, and evil
(man and his lust for sensuousness) is turned into 'good.'
Thus,
according to Diaprax, if man can not be righteous in and of
himself (requiring a source, and therefore a first cause, outside
of creation to determine right or good), then righteousness is 'irrational' and thus
'irrelevant,' i.e. of no worth or value, and must be negated for
the sake of social harmony and world peace (creating and utilizing of
crisis, i.e. "controversy," when necessary). This is the
educational objective (of Bloom and Marx), the desired outcome of Diaprax, i.e. the
spiraling process of 'changingness.' See example in
Tucson, AZ. (www.mikeshaw.tv/tucsons-mexican-american-studies-problem/
and
www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMBmqxfsEPo) I don't endorse these web
sites, only use them as an example of the dialectical process being put
into action.
"Negative" Environment: A barrier (a
negative "field of force" of pain or fear of pain) is placed between the gratifying object and the
person who desires to acquire it (preventing inquire of its worth or value
for themselves, i.e. preventing 'change'). 
“Driving forces
[the "want" of a gratifying object in the environment] are those forces or
factors affecting a situation which are “pushing” in a particular direction
[a "positive environment" initiating and sustaining the
'potential' for
Dopamine emancipation];
they tend to initiate a change and keep it going. Restraining forces
[the fear of chastening or chastening] may
be likened to walls or barriers [a "negative environment"
inhibiting or blocking the 'potential' for
Dopamine emancipation]. They only prevent or retard movement toward
them.” (Kurt Lewin in Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum
Change)
"Thou shalt not" or "can not" "prevents or retards"
"can." Negating "Thou shalt not," i.e. negating that which
"prevents or retards" that which is sensuous, makes all things which are
declared impossible, possible, makes all things which are declared unchangeable,
'changeable.'
The
"dialectical question" is: Is this a natural barrier or an
unnatural barrier? The natural barrier, being
sensual (material), requires "scientific"
evaluation, i.e. the dialectical process of 'changingness', i.e. the system of
reasoning: seduction,
deception, and manipulation, to identify and overcome
(convert into a useful form for use in the environment) for the sake
of continued Dopamine emancipation. The unnatural barrier, being
non-sensual (spiritual), requires "scientific" evaluation, i.e. the
dialectical process of 'changingness,' i.e. the system of
reasoning: seduction, deception,
and manipulation, to identify and negate (remove from the
environment since the unnatural barrier is not of the
environment, naturally stimulating Dopamine emancipation) for the sake of
Dopamine emancipation for everyone (for all
'willing' participants).
In this way the evaluation of life through
sensuousness (sight of the world) negates righteousness
(that which is not of, not proceeding from sensuousness, not of the
world), blinding man to the way of righteousness, i.e. negating
fear of God (the wrath of God upon unrighteousness) and faith in and love of His
Word (the mercy and grace of God), blinding man to the righteousness of
Christ, imputed only to those who believe upon Him alone for salvation.
The dialectical process
of 'changingness' classifies (Taxonomies') everything
according to systems ("systems analysis," "general systems
theory," "open
systems" vs. "closed
systems" i.e.
"the open system" negating the "closed system," cyclical negating lineal, changingness
negating rigidity, dialectic negating didactic, the
heresiarch paradigm using the matriarch paradigm to negate
the patriarch paradigm, i.e. disobedient children in adult
bodies using dissatisfied adult and children to negate
adults giving children an obedient adult brain, i.e.
revolution using rebellion to negate reverence, etc., i.e. 'changingness' using
sensuousness to negate righteousness). Although God,
who is righteous, is not a system, i.e. something which can be
put in a test tube and evaluated by man, as in a laboratory, because of man's sensuous (materialistic)
nature, i.e. his understanding of the world being limited to his "sense
perception," he can only perceive God as being a system (a
'weltanschauung,' a world view, or a paradigm), a system which he can
evaluate for the 'purpose' of 'change' (personally and socially, so
that he can "feel better about himself" and be "less offensive to
others") or else be perceived as being
'irrational' (being perceived as being unchangeable in a "rapidly changing world").
Being not of nature, i.e. "out
of touch with the times," righteousness must be negated
(perceived as being 'irrelevant' according to the process of 'change').
In truth
there are only two ways of thinking and acting before God. They
are by faith or by
sight―Isaiah 55:8, 9―reasoning being made subject to one or the
other, to faith, i.e. the system of righteousness
(deductive reasoning, didactic reasoning) or to
sight, i.e. the system of sensuousness (inductive
reasoning, dialogic and dialectic reasoning). The
dialectic minded person (following after the pattern of
Genesis 3:1-6)
'perceives' a third way or "system" of thinking and
acting, i.e. that of 'reasoning' itself being used to negate
faith, belief, and obedience and their residue, the conscience. Thus in dialectical
'reasoning,' reasoning can be used to overcome
the duality and conflict ("reconcile the antithesis") between the spiritual and the carnal,
faith and sight, above and below, heaven and hell, righteousness
and sensuousness, consciousness and self-consciousness, etc, by
"rationally" (dialectically) incorporating
righteousness (God's 'nature') with sensuousness (man's
nature) and sensuousness (man's nature) with righteousness
(God's 'nature'), negating
(counting as 'irrational' and thus 'irrelevant')
that righteousness which can only be imputed by God (imputed
by Christ to those who believe upon him), judging
man (because of his lust for sensuousness) as being unrighteous. With one paradigm (the system of righteousness), justification
for one's thoughts and actions is founded upon a higher authority than one's own
"sense experiences," while for the other paradigm (the system of
reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation), justification for
one's thought and action is founded within man's own "sense experience." To
the dialectician, God, who is perceived as a system of
righteousness, defining man as being more than sensuous, temporal,
material, cosmic, or even 'mystic,' having a soul which is
eternal (created and therefore accountable to an authority higher than his own
nature for his thoughts and actions), alienates (divides) man
from his own nature (that which he has in common with all of mankind) and from nature
itself, i.e. alienating him from the system of sensuousness
by making man (along with truth, meaning, purpose, life, etc.)
subject to something which is not of Nature, i.e. God.
"According to the philosopher
Hegel, truth is not found in the thesis, nor the antithesis, but in the emerging
synthesis which reconciles the two." (Martin Luther King Jr.,
Strength to Love) emphasis added
According to
dialectical thinking, God's love, righteousness, and man's love, sensuousness, can be united in
the praxis of social love (the
brotherhood of mankind in harmony with himself and nature). In this
synthesis, sin against God is negated with man's love for himself, society (his love for social approval),
and nature, i.e. truth is no longer found above man,
restraining him from his own nature, but rather is found within man, i.e.
in his sensuousness united with his 'reasoning' united in the praxis of
liberating his own nature (that nature which he has is in common with all of
mankind) from any and all unnatural restraints, i.e. mankind united in the
dialectical cause of 'social harmony and world peace,' i.e. united in the social
praxis of consensus, i.e. liberating himself from God. None dare
expose its 'cause,' i.e. the reasoning: seduction, deception, and
manipulation of man away from God. To do so (speak the truth in
righteousness) is to do so at one's own peril, i.e. be perceived as being
irrational and be treated as being irrelevant.
"We don't want to be told
where we are going because we're having to much fun (going there)."
Focus on the sensuous 'moment' (personal gratification and the
approval of others―and the potential
for more) and the rest (truth and righteousness) does not "seem to" matter,
i.e. becomes irrelevant, i.e. is negated. Sensuousness
blinds us to righteousness, i.e. a little leaven goes a long way,
leavening the whole lump. Synthesizing (replacing) belief with opinion, righteousness with sensuousness,
truth with theory, fear of God with respect of men, that which is from
above with that which is below, separates man from the God of
righteousness, love, and eternal life and keeps man in his sin, honoring
himself and his nature, rejecting "the honour which comes from God only,"
therefore condemned to eternal death. "How can ye believe, which receive honour one of
another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only?"
John 5:44
When you share your opinion you leave your belief out
(When you share your opinion of God's Word you leave God's word out,
your opinion of God's word and God's Word can not occupy the same space
and the same time together―this is to hard
for most 'ministers' to understand today since they are of the
dialectical persuasion, i.e. walking of sight, and not living in Christ, i.e.
walking by faith).
You preach and teach belief (truth, i.e. God's
Word), you dialogue opinions (theories,
i.e. your feels and thoughts regarding God's Word, reasoning from
the 'light' of your sensuous experiences and understanding).
Preaching and teaching theory (human feels and thoughts) as 'truth' (which
sensuous man can readily identify with) and dialoguing belief as an
opinion (humanizing
it, 'demythologizing' it), i.e. treating theory (human feelings
and thoughts, "sense perception") as truth and belief (God's Word,
revealed and not by private interpretation) as an opinion (which is a
private interpretation, sensuous), negates
truth and belief, making 'truth' sensuous, and belief relative,
making truth and belief 'ever changing,' and makes you a reasoning
(calculating) seducer, a deceiver, and a manipulator, an apostate
minister, a minister of a lies, a minister of Diaprax.
The unnatural barrier, i.e. righteousness (being
spiritual, non-sensual, i.e. super-natural, of God), can not be evaluated scientifically
(sensually).
Since it is not of Nature, not proceeding from nature, i.e. not sensual, it can not be manipulated
(made subject to nature, i.e. subject to human reasoning). Not being
subject to Nature (and human reasoning), i.e. not being sensual, it is therefore
sensually perceived as
"illusionary." Not being manipulatable, i.e. not being 'changeable,'
it must therefore be negated (annihilated). Since it is not 'real' to nature
(not proceeding from nature) it must to be
regarded as a "Negative Environmental Condition" which is being forced upon
Nature, inhibiting or blocking that which is natural, that which is
sensual. Being a "Negative Environmental Condition" it must therefore be annihilated ("negated")
if the dialectical cycle of 'changingness' (sensuousness) is to sustain its pathway of
continuous Dopamine emancipation. Therefore, because the 'changingness'
of "sense experience" is essential for a life of
pleasure, change must not be inhibited or blocked by
unnatural conditions of 'unchangingness,' i.e. righteousness.
"When a man has finally reached the
point where he does not think he knows it better than others, that
is when he has become indifferent to what they have done badly and
he is interested only in what they have done right, then peace and
affirmation have come to him."
(G. F. W.
Hegel, in one of the casual notes preserved at Widener) In
this way of thinking, human feelings, human thoughts, and human behavior
(sensuousness), which goes counter to the conditions of
righteousness, is liberated from the judgment which comes with
righteousness, from righteousness itself, and from the source
of righteousness, i.e. the "Because I said so" parent and
the "It is written" God. They must be
annihilated if the thoughts and actions of man are
to become pure. “What is human nature in its
purity ["that which is natural and beautiful"]?”
(Hegel, The Positivity of the Christian Religion, bracketed
added), i.e. "To be or not to be?" human that is.
That is the question being asked, answered, and put into praxis
through the use of the dialectic process.
Righteousness (judging actions based upon pre-established
right and wrong, right and wrong not of nature, i.e. not sensuous
in nature, i.e. "though shalt not," "It is written...") is dialectically 'perceived' as
unnatural ('unreasonable') and therefore
is treated as an anti-common praxis of human nature, i.e. an
unnatural way of thinking which
initiates and sustains an environment which inhibits and blocks
sensuousness (human nature) via. the use of pain or threat of pain,
'repressing' a natural and therefore a common praxis of human
nature.
Righteousness, dialectically perceived as a system of
righteousness, is thus an act of
lawlessness. Therefore, the natural praxis of sensuousness, which
negates the unnatural praxis of righteousness, is dialectically
'justified' as a praxis of 'rightness,' i.e. dialectically ('scientifically') perceived as "lawfulness without law"
(Hegel)―not just freeing
man's conscience of his guilt of unrighteousness but freeing man of a
conscience, so that he can be 'free at last' to annihilate the
righteous (the initiators and sustainers of the system of righteousness)
with no sense of guilt (faith, belief, obedience, and chastening being replaced with
meaning and purpose, reflections and opinions). By incorporating the system of
righteousness (synthesizing it) within the system of
sensuousness, for the cause
of social justice and world peace, the system of righteousness
negates itself in the praxis of Synergism. ("By
getting righteousness into dialogue with sensuousness you get rid of the system
of righteousness." "By getting
rid of the system of righteousness you get rid of the guilty conscience,
i.e. the fear of judgment." "By getting rid of the guilty conscience
you can then negate the system of
righteousness without a guilty conscience." "By
getting rid of the the system of
righteousness you can get rid of the fear
of God and the love of His Word, and thereby get rid of God himself,
i.e. that which is his is now yours."). The emergent characteristics
becomes that of Sodom and Gomorra, i.e. even two Holy angels must become
part of the 'whole' (become at-one-with the common sensuous experience
of the 'village') so that 'everybody' can participate in the system
of sensuousness (it is only here that man finds 'freedom' of
will).
In this way of thinking "sense experience"
(subjectivity)
becomes the only means available to man for determining what is
'rational' (real) and what is not. By
determining the 'meaning' or 'purpose' of life according to man's natural
(sensual) 'drive' to
approach pleasure and avoid pain (along a continuum of 'changingness'),
any 'non-sensuous' (fixed) condition which transcends this sensuous
continuum
(basing reality on an unchanging duality of right and wrong, good and
evil, righteousness and unrighteousness, obedience and
disobedience) is perceived as not only being
'irrational' but also being 'irrelevant.' Righteousness (and the
system of righteousness) is therefore the source of
'controversy' because it conflicts with sensuousness
(conflicts with, i.e. inhibiting or blocking, that which is common to,
and therefore natural to all mankind). It is in this 'logic' and
praxis that the "new order of the world" emerges.
If you can not get the system of righteousness out of the room (or
get it to participate with the system of sensuousness, thus
negating itself), then the "new" order of the world can not emerge.
(Without the whore drawing the righteous into her
lair,
the beast can not emerge. The light prevents the darkness from
emerging, the righteous prevent the 'rational': seducers, deceivers, and
manipulators from emerging―totally
taking over the world. By negating the light (by getting the
righteous to abdicate the system of righteousness by
participating in the dialectical process of 'changingness' or by removing them
from the environment), darkness can emerge and call itself 'the light,'
i.e. 'the way,' 'the truth,' and 'the life.'
"The fear of the LORD is the beginning of
knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction." Proverbs
1:7
"Sense experience must be the basis of all science. Science is only genuine science when it proceeds from sense experience, in the two forms of sense perception and sensuous need, that is, only when it proceeds from Nature." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3, p. 123) “Experience is, for me, the highest authority.” "The individual in such a moment, is coming to be what he is. He has experienced himself. He has become what he is.” “Existential living is to say that the self and personality emerge from experience. It means that one becomes a participant in and an observer of the ongoing process of organismic experience.” "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience.” (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy) "If I know religion as alienated human self-consciousness, then what I know in it as religion is not my self-consciousness, but my alienated self-consciousness confirmed in it." "... atheism and communism are ... the first real emergence, the actual realization for man of man’s essence and of his essence as something real." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's Philosophy in General)
“Dialectics [finding common-ism via. dialogue, i.e. reflection, i.e. thought, i.e. theory] thereby reduced itself to the science of the general laws of motion [sensuousness]—both in the external world and in the thought of man—two sets of laws which are identical in substance.” (Friedrich Engels, Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy) bracketed information added "A being which does not have its nature outside itself is not a natural being, and plays no part in the system of nature." "The abstract thinker recognizes at the same time that sensuousness – externality in contrast to thought shuttling back and forth within itself – is the essence of nature." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's Philosophy in General) "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest) "'Validity' [opinion-sensuousness necessitating discourse] now signifies that moral norms could win the agreement of all concerned, on the condition that they jointly examine in practical discourse whether a corresponding practice is in the equal interest of all." "With the devaluation of the epistemic authority of the God’s eye view [revelation-righteousness necessitating preaching and teaching], moral commands lose their religious as well as their metaphysical foundation." (Jürgen Habermas, Communicative Ethics The inclusion of the Other) bracketed information added ['Shifting' the learning environment from preaching and teaching to an environment of discourse changes revelation and righteousness into opinions and sensuousness, changes the praxis of belief into a praxis of theory, for all who participate.]
"Marx reproached Hegel (and, in even stronger terms, Hegel’s successors who had reverted to Kant and Fichte) with his failure to overcome the duality of thought and being, of theory and practice, of subject and object." "Hegel’s inadequacy is that he only seems to allow the absolute spirit to make history. The resulting otherworldliness of consciousness vis-d-vis the real events of history becomes, in the hands of Hegel’s disciples, an arrogant-and reactionary confrontation of ‘spirit’ and ‘mass’." "In order to progress from these ‘facts’ to facts in the true meaning of the word it is necessary to perceive their historical conditioning as such and to abandon the point of view that would see them as immediately given: they must themselves be subjected to a historical and dialectical examination [sensuous examination]." "Marx urged us to understand ‘the sensuous world,’ the object, reality, as human sensuous activity." "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary," “It is not men’s consciousness that determines their existence, but on the contrary, their social existence that determines their consciousness.” "... consciousness must develop a dialectical contradiction between its immediate interests and its long-term objectives, ..." "Marx sees … consciousness as ‘practical critical activity’ with the task of ‘changing the world’." "... for the dialectical method the central problem is to change reality.… reality with its ‘obedience to laws'." "When the dialectical method destroys the fiction of the immortality of the categories [above-below, parent-child, teacher-student, boss-worker, God-man] it also destroys their reified character [righteousness-unrighteousness] and clears the way to a knowledge of reality [sensuousness]." "Praxis [the negation of the system of righteousness by the praxis of the system of sensuousness, negating the system of righteousness] becomes the form of action appropriate to the isolated individual, it becomes his ethics." (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness)
“To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual . . .” “The justice of state constitutions is to be decided not on the basis of Christianity, not from the nature of Christian society but from the nature of human society.” (Comments by Joseph O’Malley Ed. of Karl Marx's, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')
Therefore,
dialectically, a
person's worth is based upon the amount of pleasure he experiences
or provides or
promises to provide for himself and for others because of his
participation within the system of sensuousness vs. the amount of
pain or promise of pain he experiences or has the potential of
bringing upon himself and upon others because of his participation
within the system of righteousness. The key to
dialectical success is the controlling of the environment, changing it
from an environment of right and wrong, where sensuousness
(pain and pleasure) is subject to righteousness, i.e.
'unchangingness,' to an environment of sensuousness, where
'rightness' and 'wrongness' is subject to sensuousness (pain and
pleasure), i.e. 'changingness.'
Dopamine, being the connection of the environment of
pleasure to man and man to the environment of pleasure, causes a spiraling
(not just cyclical) effect in the man-environment situation. While
events in life may be pleasant the first time they are experienced they
quickly loose the element of pleasure (Dopamine emancipation) upon being repeatedly experienced.
This is because the area of stored information in the brain, the dendrites
and the synaptic gaps between neurons, emancipate Dopamine during the first
few experiences but quickly wane in Dopamine emancipation upon repeated experiences. This is
why memorization, homework, and things repeated become 'boring,' the information being
memorized or repeated no longer being relevant to the present environment which
stimulates Dopamine emancipation (the information being "inappropriate
information" since it is, or has the potential of, inhibiting or blocking
Dopamine emancipation). Either the
learning environment must have new elements of gratification or be new
(gratifying) itself or promise
newness of experience (the gratification of innovative) or it does
not offer hope of Dopamine emancipation.
New experiences, i.e. 'change,' must be present in the environment or it
becomes dissatisfactory. The system of righteousness, which is
not in harmony with, nor subject to the environment which stimulates
Dopamine emancipation,
or 'detoxifies' a person from dependence upon (lust for) the environment which
stimulates Dopamine emancipation,
must become subject to 'change' itself (thus negating itself) or it
will initiate and sustain an environment which is detrimental or damaging ("dangerous") to
the self-environment-dialectical cycle of life. It is therefore, dialectically, the duty of
those in control of the environment to guarantee an "equality of opportunity"
experience
for all participants in the enhancement (augmentation) of pleasure (personal gratification).
If the environment is to be perceived as being fair or just to all, the needs of the many,
i.e. the sensuous, must become greater than the needs of the few or
the one, i.e. the righteous, over the many). Any control over the
environment which inhibits or blocks physical, mental, and social 'change' (which inhibits or
blocks the expansion or augmentation of pleasure in all areas of life, i.e. the potential of
Dopamine emancipation
for all, or at least the hope of it), is sensually perceived as the source of alienation and reification,
propagating "neurosis" upon society.
The children of
Israel, while in the wilderness, crying out for the things they enjoyed
while in Egypt―Numbers 11:4, 5―is
an example of "neurosis," i.e. expressing their alienation from that
which is of nature both individually and socially, in their case their
individual and collective loving of pleasure―their
love for the cucumbers, leeks, melons, and garlic of Egypt,
their
sensuousness, being
greater than their love of God, His
righteousness, i.e. the manna of life. In Christ (the
manna of life), the individual, i.e. the "whosoever" who believes upon
Christ, the εκκλησια, the "called out
one," becomes the means to the κοινωνια, the fellowship of the saints―"For
where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the
midst of them." Matthew 18:20. The individual
takes on eternal significance in Christ, the fellowship of the saints being a byproduct for
the encouragement and reproof for the
individual to continue in his walk in the way of righteousness, i.e.
in the righteousness which can only be imputed by Christ, while
the individual takes on temporary significance in society, society being
a 'driving' force seducing and deceiving him into becoming 'rational,'
becoming at-one with
it and the world, i.e. 'rationally' justifying himself and the world in
sensuousness, which is natural to both the man and the world.
Herein lies the reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation
of the "emergent church," merging sensuousness (society)
with righteousness (Christ) and calling it
'righteousness.' "
Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty." 2 Corinthians 6:14-18
Without the merging of Marx with Freud (social-psychology) in social action (praxis) the individual would have lost his identity with the 'whole' and sensuousness (that which comes from the individual) would have been lost in a top-down system (seen as fascism, i.e. an "authoritarian personality"). It was essential that both the individual and society find common-ground in sensuousness if the dialectical process was to continued in the praxis of 'change,' negating righteousness, i.e. replacing a "negative environment" of righteousness with a "positive environment" of sensuousness.
“Freud's individual psychology is in its very essence social psychology.” (Herbart Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud) “It is not individualism that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him. Society is the necessary framework through which freedom and individuality are made realities.” “Only within a social context individual man is able to realize his own potential as a rational being.” (Karl Marx) “The individual is emancipated in the social group.” (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) "The real nature of man is the totality of social relations.” (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach # 6) "... once you can identify a community, you have discovered the primary unity of society above the individual and the family that can be mobilized ... to bring about positive social change." (Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing) “Freedom becomes anchored in the subject. Nevertheless, what this means remains open to question. Freedom is now content to contest power and thus forgets that power is necessary to constrain its arbitrary exercise. The ethical and practical function of freedom is lost. Indeed, since subjective freedom is a social phenomenon, maintaining sanity depends upon the ability of the individual to fill a social role and affirm his or her fullest potential.” (Stephen Eric Bronner, Of Critical Theory and its Theorists) "Walden Two: 'Now that we know how positive reinforcement works, and why negative doesn't' ... 'we can be more deliberate and hence more successful in our cultural design. We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled, though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do. That's the source of the tremendous power of positive reinforcement―there's no restrain and no revolt. By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behavior―the motives, the desires, the wished. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
The Negation of the "Negative" environment of righteousness:
The 'driving purpose' of the "Positive" environment of sensuousness is the negation of the "Negative" environment of righteousness: “The philosophers have come up with many different views [interpretations, opinions] of the world [producing and sustaining a "Negative" environment of righteousness, i.e. their opinions being right and others wrong], the objective however, is change [producing and sustaining a "Positive" environment of sensuousness continuously negating the "Negative" environment of righteousness―called 'critical theory'].” (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis # 11) "The use of ‘critical theory’ . . . enabled a certain interpretation of Marxism to enter academic discourse. . . . critical theory was to militate against: all attempts to construct a fixed system, every attempt to identify the subject with the object [the child with the parent, accountable to their standards, man with God, accountable to His righteousness].” “Humanistic potential is what critical inquiry must clarify. Grounding itself within the tradition of emancipation, in theory and practice . . .” (Stephen Eric Bronner, Critical Theory and its Theorists) “Through the sudden popularity of Herbert Marcuse in the America of the late 1960’s, the Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory (Kritische Theorie) has also had a significant influence on the New Left in this country [the democratic party].” “Praxis [social "sense experience," liberating man from the control of the traditional home] and reason [sense based 'reasoning,' liberating man from the control of the conscience] were the two poles of Critical Theory. ” “‘A great truth wants to be criticized ["question authority"], not idolized,’ Nietzsche.” “Eros and Civilization went far beyond the earlier efforts of Critical Theory to merge Freud and Marx [resulting in social-psychology, i.e. Transformational Marxism, i.e. conscietization, democratization, communitarianism, etc., being used and taught in almost all educational institutions today (from nursery to nursing homes), being propagated in American and around the world as 'Democracy'].” (Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination) bracketed information added
"Freud speaks of religion [the patriarchal paradigm, the system of righteousness, the "Negative environment" of righteousness] as a 'substitute-gratification' – the Freudian analogue to the Marxian formula, 'opiate of the people.'" (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) The child abdicates his hate and love to the parent, hating his own nature of gratification because the parents hate it and wanting the gratification, i.e. love of the parents, instead of loving the things which naturally gratified him, along with those who manifest his same nature when instead, according to Freud, he is to love his own nature and hate the parent who restrains his nature. Through his use of the dialectical process, Theodor Adorno correlated the traditional American family with fascism, labeling it a "potential" fascist training camp. If not properly dealt with through education and government programs to cut it off it which would turn to local, state, and national government leaders, advocating ideas of sovereignty, limited government, and inalienable rights (isolationism, i.e. private rights, and imperialism, i.e. national sovereignty) when it was threatened with a totalitarian (globalist) takeover. His work is still used today to 'justify' the democratic takeover of the world (via. the destruction of the traditional family). Adorno wrote: "The conception of the ideal family situation for the child: (1) uncritical obedience to the father and elders, (2) pressures directed unilaterally from above to below, (3) inhibition of spontaneity, and (4) emphasis on conformity to externally imposed values." “An attitude of complete submissiveness toward ‘supernatural forces’ and a readiness to accept the essential incomprehensibility of ‘many important things’ strongly suggest the persistence in the individual of infantile attitudes toward the parents, that is to say, of authoritarian submission in a very pure form.” “Authoritarian submission was conceived of as a very general attitude that would be evoked in relation to a variety of authority figures―parents, older people, leaders, supernatural power, and so forth.” “Family relationships are characterized by fearful subservience to the demands of the parents and by an early suppression of impulses not acceptable to them.” “God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority.” “Submission to authority, desire for a strong leader, subservience of the individual to the state, and so forth, have so frequently and, as it seems to us, correctly, been set forth as important aspects of the Nazi creed that a search for correlates of prejudice had naturally to take these attitudes into account.” "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality) Without the negation of the traditional family, with its 'authoritative' father figure, and its affect upon society (the limiting of governments power), according to dialectical thinking and those who adhere to it, social harmony and world peace, i.e. globalism, is unattainable.
"In fact, children learned to obey the prevailing order at their mother's knee, despite the potential for an alternative social system implicit in the traditional matriarchal ethic of warmth, acceptance, and love." (Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination) "Thus, for instance, once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the holy family, the former must itself be annihilated [vernichtet] theoretically and practically." (Karl Marx, Theses On Feuerbach #4) "‘It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one’s father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud) "One day, the brothers who had been driven out came together, killed and devoured their father and so made an end of the patriarchal horde" ( Freud, Totem and taboo 1912-1913a, p. 141). (Click on chart for larger view and more details.)
"... memory of gratification is at the origin of all thinking, and the impulse to recapture past gratification is the hidden driven power behind the process of thought.” (Herbart Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud) [Thus "gratification is at the origin of all thinking" driving the dialectical process of unrighteousness, i.e. the negation of the patriarchal paradigm, i.e. the negation of righteousness, i.e. the negation of the "Negative Environment."] "What the child knows consciously and the adult unconsciously, is that we are nothing but body [with no eternal soul]." "Life is of the body and only life creates value; all values are bodily values." "Parental discipline, religious denunciation of bodily pleasure, . . . have all left man overly docile, but secretly in his unconscious unconvinced, and therefore neurotic" “The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself.” "We must return to Freud and say that incest guilt created the familial organization." "Human consciousness can be liberated from the parental (Oedipal) complex only be being liberated from its cultural derivatives, the paternalistic state and the patriarchal God." “Freud, Hegel, and Nietzsche are, like Marx, compelled to postulate external domination and its assertion by force in order to explain repression.” “The repression of normal adult sexuality is required only by cultures which are based on patriarchal domination.” “The abolition of repression would only threaten patriarchal domination.” "Psychoanalysis must treat religion as a neurosis." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) “... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a ‘barrier to incest,’ ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother—culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father [the annihilation of the patriarchal paradigm, the "Negative environment"], and the establishment of the brother clan, which in turn deifies the assassinated father and introduces those taboos and restraints which, ..., generated social morality [and the 'neurosis of civilization'].” (Herbart Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud) "Freud noted that … patricide and incest … are part of man’s deepest nature." (Irvin D. Yalom, Theory and Practice and Group Psychotherapy)"For the wicked boasteth of his heart’s desire, and blesseth the covetous, whom the LORD abhorreth. The wicked, through the pride of his countenance, will not seek after God: God is not in all his thoughts." Psalms 10:3, 4
"And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12
According to the system of Diaprax: incest 'justifies' the praxis of
patricide―the
mendacious
system of seduction, deception, and manipulation (reasoning) 'justifies' the annihilation (negation)
of the system of righteousness, the 'purpose' (the will) of the children
'justifies' the annihilation (negation) of the 'purpose' (the
will) of
the Father, the heresiarchal paradigm 'justifies' the annihilation (negation)
of the patriarchal paradigm, globalism 'justifies' the annihilation (negation)
of nationalism, socialism (democratization, conscietization,
common-ism, hedon -ism) 'justifies' the annihilation (negation)
of capital-ism (capitulation), the proletariat 'justifies' the
annihilation (negation) of the bourgeoisie, community
(common-unity) 'justifies' the annihilation (negation) of the
family (traditional family), the flesh 'justifies' the annihilation (negation)
of the spirit, dialoguing opinions to find common ground amongst men
'justifies' the annihilation (negation) of the preaching and
teaching of truth which proceeds from God, parents, etc, consensus
'justifies' the annihilation (negation) of the conscience,
'change' 'justifies' the annihilation (negation) of that which
is absolute or sacred, synthesis ('shiftiness,' speculation,
uncertainty) 'justifies' the annihilation (negation)
of thesis (position, knowing, certainty), 'lust' and 'sin' (perceived as
human nature, i.e. normal human behavior),
'justifies'
the annihilation (negation) of judgment upon lust and sin
(human nature) as
being evil, "concern about pleasing man" 'justifies' the
annihilation
(negation) of "concern about pleasing God," etc.
The patriarchal paradigm, the
system of righteousness, which
teaches (inculcates) absolute right and wrong (rules and commands which must be memorized and practiced,
obeyed or else chastening follows, i.e. by force or threat
of force) which inhibit or block (suppresses, represses)
Dopamine emancipation
(when its
potential within the environment or the imagination is present), i.e.
inhibiting or blocking the potential for synthesis between the
individual and the environment, is
"Taxonomized" as a thesis-antithesis condition
(righteousness dividing a person from his own nature and the
nature of others, i.e. nature itself, i.e. alienating him from the world of sensuousness)
and must be negated via. the praxis of synthesis
(the praxis of the dialectical process of unrighteousness, i.e.
of 'changingness,' the praxis of the
annihilation of the "patriarchal horde").
Only under the condition of pressure (the pressure of personal survival
and the fear of social rejection―which those in the righteousness of
Christ are not under the control of, having denied themselves [denying
individual sensuousness, the lust of the flesh, eyes] and picked up their cross [denying social
sensuousness, the approval of men, the lust of the eyes] and are following Jesus, not themselves or the 'village,'
as the way, truth, and life) can the dialectician evaluate where
(along the continuum of adaptability to 'change') the individual resides
in the 'moment' (with the believer sticking out like a light in
the darkness, being perceived by everyone in darkness as being in denial to
the 'truth,' "raining on everybody's parade").
"To study something
means to study it in the process of change [in an environment of
sensuousness where righteousness is challenged, i.e. put
under pressure]; that is the dialectical
method's basic demand." (L. S. Vygotsky Mind in Society)
Only in the 'change' environment of consensus (creating unity
via. sensuousness and dialectical reasoning) can the protagonist, the facilitator of the
process of 'change,' the deceiver, 'discover' the individuals
history, i.e. know his potential for, or adaptability to 'change'
(his dissatisfaction with the way things are while under the
system of righteousness, i.e. 'unchangingness'),
and then manipulate him within the process of 'changingness.'
The dialectic 'logic' (lie) of consensus goes like this: It's not
about hate, we don't hate you, it about love, we love pleasure (social
unity in pleasure). If you would just put aside your hate of
unrighteousness (stop being so judgmental), just for the 'moment,' and
be 'reasonable', loving the sensuousness of pleasure
within yourself without bringing righteousness into the
situation, we could both get along, love one another, and come to
consensus in the act of negating righteousness (praxis). "Roland Holst stressed the
‘dialectical interaction between the human mind and social environment’, and the
importance of prefigurative forms of socialist ethics even in capitalist
society." (Peter Drucker ‘More freedom’ or ‘more harmony’? Henriette Roland
Holst, Jacques Engels and the influence of class and gender on socialists’
sexual attitudes. Paper submitted to the seminar on “Labour organizations
and sexuality”, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, 5 October 2001)
"But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and
being deceived." 2 Timothy 3:13
The
dialectical formula
for 'change' and the "New World Order:" The "New" order of the
world is an order or
system built on the praxis of sensuousness negating
righteousness, i.e. the "New World Order" of the system of
sensuousness―'equality of opportunity' negating the
"Old World Order" of the system of righteousness―'top-down
hierarch'). I change
Hegel's A + -A = A to R(-s) + -R(-s)
= 'R' or S(-r) to expose
the system of reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation
of the dialectical process of 'changingness,' i.e. the process which negates the
system of righteousness (R(-s))
through the liberation and praxis of the system of
sensuousness (S(-r)).
The following five pages or so may take some
concerted effort (and patience) on your part to understand (patience
because of the repeating, some may say prolixity, of the formula), but, when understood, it
will make it easier to identify how the dialectical process of
'changingness' is being
applied to your life and the lives of your loved ones for the 'purpose'
of 'change,' i.e. reasoning: seduction, deception, and
manipulation, leading the world into totalitarianism. Call it
Total Quality Management, Total Quality Leadership,
Transformational Outcome Based Education, No Child Left Behind,
School to Work, Education Nation, Community Oriented Policing System,
Health Maintenance Organization, Theory and Practice,
General System Theory, International Standards Organization,
Church Growth, Emerging Church, National Health Care,
or call it by any other name it is still the praxis of
common-ism, i.e. the creation of a common A, i.e.
the system of reasoning: seduction, deception, and
manipulation creating an "open ended," "non-directed" (controlled)
environment, liberating the system of sensuousness
(S(-r)), negating the
system of righteousness (R(-s)). It all fits
to Genesis 3:1-6.
(The 'right' of 'free will' is negated in the praxis of
common-ism, as no one has the 'right' to opt out and be treated as an
'equal.' Those who praxis the dialectical process―Diaprax,
simply want to be masters, i.e. pimps over God's creation, seducing man
into slavery, deceiving him into believing that he is free, when, in
truth, he is being manipulated into doing the master facilitator's
wishes, being his whore, his source for Dopamine emancipation,
actually paying him for the 'privilege.')
While the system of righteousness does not
engender an "open ended," non-directed" (permissive) environment
of sensuousness, being only able to temporarily restrain the
system of sensuousness at the best, it can never produce
righteousness (non-permissiveness) in a man, in and of itself.
Yet those who are righteous (those whose sins are covered by the
blood of the Lamb of God, Jesus Christ) demonstrate the system of
righteousness in their lives (by keeping the Lord and His Word
before them continually, i.e. being directed by the Lord, i.e. lead by
the Holy Spirit) not to achieve righteousness in and of
themselves (by their own thoughts and their own actions, which is not
possible) but because they are made righteous, in their belief in
Christ, who is righteous. Apart from the work of Christ,
and belief in Him, none are made righteous. It is because
of a man belief (having a soul) conflicting with his carnal
nature (having a sensuous body) that he demonstrates a belief-action
dichotomy (Romans 7:22-25). While those of the system of
reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulate build upon the
foundation of sensuous action (praxis), i.e. pro-active on
the side of man's carnal nature, i.e. 'purposed' in the liberation the
system of sensuousness from the restraints of the system
of righteousness (self-esteem), those of the system of
righteousness build upon the foundation of faith, belief, and
obedience in God, parent, etc., i.e. restraining the system of
sensuousness via. chastening (self-discipline and self-control).
Human reasoning (philosophy, psychology, sociology, anthropology, etc)
finds itself on the side of sensuousness, thus it negates
righteousness in its praxis. Its formula (the
dialectical process of 'changingness') is the basis for initiating and sustaining the
"new" order of the world, an order which was first praxis(ed) by
the woman (with Adam following) in the garden in Eden, as recorded in
Genesis 3:1-6. For example: while the system of
righteousness rests on the side of pro-creation (life), in that men and
women are created differently with the physical features to naturally
pro-create, pro-creation being the criteria for their differences
(requiring restraint, responsibility, and accountability on both husband
and wife), the system of sensuousness and reasoning: seduction, deception,
and manipulation rests on the side of the system of
sensuousness (pleasure), liberating
men and women from the restraint, responsibility, and
accountability of pro-creation, liberating all to the praxis
of pleasure itself, with permissiveness, i.e. "equality of opportunity,"
being the purpose of life for all.
"According to Freud, the ultimate essence
of our being is erotic."
“The essence of man consists in desiring.”
"Self-perfection of the human individual is fulfilled in union with the
world in pleasure.”
“In the words of Thoreau: ‘We need pray
for no higher heaven than the pure senses can furnish, a
purely sensuous life. Our present senses are but rudiments
of what they are destined to become.’” (Norman O.
Brown, Life Against Death:
The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)
"By inviting mothers to evaluate the age of the children in the village, grading them by sex, weight, then graded their health as poor, very poor, very very poor, . . . now a community is in control over families." (Tianjin 2010 - Shaping the Future, TQM conference held in Communist China, September, 2010) The "old" order of the world, where private meant "no body else's business," is now replaced with a "new" order of the world where private means, "that which is no body's business is now everybody's business," where "a new method of communication significantly disrupts the way business and society operate." (ibid) The top-down system of private family, private land, private business (R(-s)) is now evaluated and controlled by the feelings, thoughts, and actions of the "village," (S(-r)), i.e. its common-istic feelings, thoughts, and actions now determine how the family, the land, and the businesses are to function in "serving and protecting" the "village," not the private family or the individual.
R(-s) is the system of Righteousness (God's command not to eat of "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil" and the women and Adam's obeying the command―although the woman and Adam were righteous before they ate of the fruit of the 'forbidden' tree, they became unrighteous, i.e. wicked, when they ate of it, making all men wicked, i.e. unrighteous, from then all, "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:" Romans 3:10 so that Jesus Christ, who is righteous, could redeem those who recognized their wickedness and repented of their sins before God. "I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." Luke 5:31 while many, thinking dialectically, will continue to reason within themselves that they are 'good' (righteous in their own eyes) and therefore, perceiving no need to repent, will continue to 'justify' themselves as 'good' before men.
"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15. While no man is righteous before God (apart from the redeeming work of Christ), he can still think and act according to a system of righteousness (having faith in the parent, believing in the parent's commands as right, willingly obeying their commands, and accepting chastening when they, the child, is wrong, wrong according the the parents judgment, accepting the parent as the law maker, and the judge and executor of the law―the parent having mercy and grace according to his will, according to his conditions).
R(-s) is the system of sensuousness suppressed by the system of righteousness (the woman's subconscious desire to "touch" the fruit of "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil," Dopamine emancipation―every time she saw it or thought of it). The system of sensuousness being the natural desires of the body to approach pleasure and avoid pain.
R(-s) is a condition, according to dialectical thought, which causes tension within the person, a tension between what they are told to do by a higher authority and what they want to do according to their natural desires (their "lusts"), resulting in "neurosis"when they are in an environment which provides the potential stimulation of Dopamine emancipation. When two people with opposing positions of R(-s) confront one another, over what they are taught is right, conflict ensues until one or the other is overcome by force, threat of force, or persuasion (preaching and teaching), with the system of Righteousness, i.e. faith, belief, obedience and chastening, staying intact and the system of sensuousness remaining (more or less) suppressed within both parties.
S(-r) is the system of Sensuousness liberated by the system of reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation from (detoxified of) the restraint of the system of Righteousness (God's condition, "you will die," 'changed' by Satan's condition "you will not die"), i.e. the system of Sensuousness emancipated through the use of dialectical reasoning ('sensible' reasoning, i.e. sense based reasoning, dialoguing within themselves, 'rationally' justifying that they will not die if they eat of "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil" because there is nothing perceivably wrong with the tree itself, i.e. it will not kill them since it is just like all the other trees they eat of, and those trees didn't kill them, therefore they will not die if they eat of it's fruit). The system of Sensuousness is placed upon a continuum which grades the worth (value or meaning) of life based upon where along it your past, present, and potential future experiences reside, with the experiences of the moment being a 'driving' force. (This is why facilitators must create stress, i.e. crisis―of survival and fear of lose of respect from others―in meetings to move the participants into their desired outcome). That dialectical continuum or spectrum grades the 'value' or worth of life from pain being on the one side to pleasure being on the other, not just physical, but mental and social as well. The system of righteousness, because it inhibits or blocks pleasure (incorporating chastening or threat of chastening to restrain the system of sensuousness), is not subject to a continuum like the system of sensuousness and therefore is "sense perceived" as an unnatural source of pain―physically, mentally, and socially―which must be negated if the individual (and society) are to enjoy a life of pleasure (world peace and social harmony).
S(-r) is the sensation of 'rightness' ('righteousness') experienced by all who participate in the consensus outcome. It blinds man to his sin and to the love, mercy, and grace of God, turning darkness into light (sensuousness into 'good') and light into darkens (righteousness into evil), i.e. turning good into evil and evil into good. If it feels good to all ('seems to be' right) then reasoning says it must be good (right), 'justifies' the negation of righteousness which condemns it as evil, defining righteousness as being evil."For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God." Romans 10:3 "There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25
In the dialectical process of 'changingness,' i.e. in the system of reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation, you must get rid of the 'fear factor' ("you will die," i.e. you will be chastening, i.e. you will be held accountable, i.e. you will be judged for your unrighteous, evil sensuous thoughts and actions) if you are to emancipate (liberate) the 'reasoning process' (the dialogical-dialectical reasoning that it is your 'human right' to do what you want as long as it is perceived as being harmless and/or beneficial to yourself and to the rest of humanity, i.e. 'reasoning' being the mediator of 'opposites' finding oneness). Dialogue brings Sensuousness to the table of 'Reasoning,' undoing the fear of judgment which comes from the Preaching and Teaching of Righteousness. Reasoning is thereby detached from the restraints, i.e. the lessons of wisdom learned from the past and made subject to the unproved opinions and dreams of the present and future. A categorical imperative submitted to dialogue negates its religious foundation ("It is written" made subject to "I feel" and "I think" negates faith, belief, obedience, and chastening, i.e. negates the system of righteousness). By the act of evaluation (by dialectical reasoning, "sense based 'reasoning' and 'reasoning' based sensuousness," reasoning justifying the system of sensuousness in determining what is good and what is evil, by reflecting upon, i.e. dialoguing within herself upon "Thou shalt not," i.e. weighing God's command according to her personal feelings and thoughts) the woman made herself like a god, making herself (with Adam following) equal with God, as gods before God, as gods who determine good and evil from their own sense based system of reasoning, i.e. via. the system of sensuousness: 1) from her "sensuous need" to touch the fruit, for Adam the "sensuous need" to follow after the woman, to trust in her and the Serpent and not God, for the rest of mankind the "sensuous need" to relate with the environment which stimulates Dopamine emancipation, 2) from their "sense perception" that there was nothing wrong with or harmful concerning the 'forbidden fruit,' and 3) from their "sense experience" that they did not die when they ate of the forbidden fruit―setting the pattern for all of mankind following, that all things pleasurable, all things which proceeds from nature, including man, when it is perceived as being 'good,' is good, perceiving all things natural as good and all things good as becoming one via. the praxis of sensuousness, thereby rejecting (negating) the system of righteousness, rejecting determining good and evil according to God's 'unnatural' will. God is spirit (He is good, and all things good proceed from Him). Therefore the woman and Adam both, loving the creation more than the creator (the woman being the first environmentalist, Adam being the first humanist, both following after the pathway of Satan, the master facilitator of 'change') 'willingly' participated in the system of reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation, used to 'liberate' them and all of mankind from God's system of righteousness, and therefore from God's righteousness, i.e. from God himself. The only problem remaining, according to dialectical reasoning, was the residue of righteousness which remained in the form of the conscience, which therefore (through the consensus process) had to be 'changed' into thereadily 'changeable' super-ego, i.e. the 'conscience ' now influenced, i.e. made subject to 'changeable' of the sensuousness of the 'moment.' Thus in the 'justified' sensuous 'moment' of the present, the restraints of the conscience are denied.
The difference between the conscience and the super-ego:
“What we call ‘conscience’ perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves: the super-ego ‘unites in itself the influences of the present and of the past.’” “The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself.” (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) “. . .‘the superego. . .is conceived in psychoanalysis as functioning substantially in the same way as conscience [some external force must help in its development, in this case, society, i.e. the system of sensuousness is used instead of the family, the system of righteousness].’ Superego development is conceived as ‘. . . the incorporation of the moral standards of society…’ [instead of the moral standards of the parents or God]. Therefore the levels of the Taxonomy should describe successive levels of goal setting appropriate to superego development ["the moral standards of society"].” (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook 2, Affective Domain) emphasis added “The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated. The family,... is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior. Unfortunately, because of the reduction of influence exerted by neighbors, the extended family and even the family [society, the system of sensuousness refuses to support the family, the system of righteousness], social control is now often more dependent on external control [police state, public informants to the authorities, self esteem - public esteem], than on internal self-control [the standards established by parents or God, i.e. the system of righteousness or self-control, self-discipline, self-denial].” (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz , Community Policing The meaning of “Community” in Community Policing)
"And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man’s work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear: Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you, Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God. Seeing ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren, see that ye love one another with a pure heart fervently: Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever." 1 Peter 1:17-23
While dualism (the antithesis of above-below, spirit-flesh, i.e. the system of righteousness restraining the system of sensuousness and the system of sensuousness rebelling against the system of righteousness) has always been the pattern of history (since the woman and Adam sinned), the dialectical system of reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation has always traveled down the same pathway of history (roaming to and fro, 1 Peter 5:8), promoting another pathway, a pathway of reasoning: seduction, deceitfulness and manipulation, advancing the "cause" of 'changingness,' advancing what "seems to be" another way of thinking and acting where the system of righteousness is perceived as being irrational and therefore is treated as irrelevant (as was begun in the garden in Eden until self-consciousness turned to a guilty conscience, leading to the making of clothing to hide their nakedness and their hiding from God when he arrived on the scene). In dialectical thought, the either-or, above-below, good-evil conflict can be changed (synthesized) into another way of thinking, changing the world from the consciousness and self-consciousness conflict, to where reasoning ("self justification") can be used to negate life's conflict between the system of righteousness and the system of sensuousness (to either obey God or "doing one's own thing," with a guilty conscience). By 'rationally' transcending the duality of either-or via. the negation of the system of righteousness itself, getting people to perceive it as a wrong way of thinking and acting, the negation of the residue of the system of righteousness, i.e. the guilty conscience can be negated as well (liberating man from a top-down system to a system which "seems to be right," with equality, fraternity, liberty for all).
"One of the most fascinating aspects of group therapy is that everyone is born again, born together in the group." “Few individuals, as Asch has shown, can maintain their objectivity [belief in parent or God] in the face of apparent group unanimity; ...” (Irvin D. Yalom, Theory and Practice and Group Psychotherapy) “The individual is emancipated in the social group.” “Freud commented that only through the solidarity of all the participants could the sense of guilt be assuaged.” (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) “Only within a social context individual man is able to realize his own potential as a rational being.” (Joseph O’Malley, Karl Marx Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right' )
By man's participation within the dialectically process, making himself and nature (that is the sensuousness of the creation) the foundation for determining 'good' and 'evil' ('shifting' himself and all of mankind from a solid, unchanging, rock of righteousness to the 'shifting,' changing sands of sensuousness), he makes himself an enemy of God―breaking the first commandment, "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." The new "order" of the world is to use dialectical thinking (sensuousness and reasoning synthesized) to negate the consciousness of God's judgment upon sin. By negating the fear of judgment at God's hands, through the intoxication of the pleasures of this life in the here-and-now for the 'purpose' of bettering the lives of all mankind, even the religious can be 'reasonable': seduced and deceived into participating in the process of 'changingness" and therefore manipulated into promoting and helping create a "new" world order, who's real 'purpose' is the negation of the system of righteousness. The moment you stop weighing your life and the world around you, including the church you attend, from God and His Word (from His righteousness, i.e. "trusting in the Lord with all your heart," "taking captive every thought to the obedience of Christ") you begin weighing God and His Word from your life and the world around you, including weighing God and His Word from the church you attend (according to your sensuousness, i.e. "leaning to your own understanding").
“The more of himself man attributes to God, the less he has left in himself.” “The only practically possible emancipation is the unique theory which holds that man is the supreme being for man.” (Karl Marx) “The only emancipation ... is the emancipation of man. The head of this emancipation is philosophy,....” “Philosophy is not outside the world; it simply has a different kind of presence in the world. The world is its ground; it is the spiritual quintessence of its age. The world is the object of its enquiry and concern; it is the wisdom of the world.” (Joseph O’Malley translator of Karl Marx's Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right) "Philosophy is a free and not self-seeking activity, … This activity contains the essential element of a negation, because to produce is also to destroy; … as Mind passes on from its natural form, it also proceeds from its exact code of morals and the robustness of life to reflection and conception. The result of this is that it lays hold of and troubles this real, substantial kind of existence, this morality and faith, and thus the period of destruction commences." (Hegel’s Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Introduction B. Relation of Philosophy to Other Departments of Knowledge) “The moment of reflection, however, is itself interwoven with experience. Subjectivity experiences itself in that moment.” (Stephen Eric Bronner, Of Critical Theory and its Theorists) "Human beings are because they are in a situation. And they will be more the more they not only critically reflect upon their existence but critically act upon it." (Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed) "In the process of history man gives birth to himself. He becomes what he potentially is, and he attains what the serpent―the symbol of wisdom and rebellion―promised, and what the patriarchal, jealous God of Adam did not wish: that man would become like God himself.” (Erich Fromm, You shall be as gods)
The dialectical
formula: Dialectically, it is not enough to feel sensuous
or think sensuously, you must become sensuous by putting
sensuousness into praxis against righteousness
―"It can not be hate when it is perceived as being 'right.'"
Thus the "Id," sensuousness, united with the "Ego," the will to
power, liberates hate from being against
sensuousness (and spontaneity), liberates man from having to
live according to God's will, to being against
righteousness (and "self-denial"), liberates man so that he can live
according to man's will. Only man does not perceive his praxis
of sensuousness negating righteousness as being a praxis
of hate against righteousness, since
righteousness is perceived (sensually) as being 'irrational,' i.e.
whatever happens to it, or to those who hold to it, is 'irrelevant,' not
of concern, i.e. "they brought it upon themselves" for their
'irrational' thoughts and actions, inhibiting and blocking
sensuousness. In this way of thinking and acting, the
conscience (the vessel of righteousness, subject to the parent,
God above, i.e. unchanging) is negated, being replaced with the
super-ego (the vessel of sensuousness, subject to the village,
the community, society, the environment below, i.e. ever changing) with
no sense of guilt for one's thoughts or actions, i.e. "It was necessary
for the sake of society (the team, the group, the institution, the
environment, the world, the cosmos, the 'church,' the 'kingdom of God,' etc.).
Two material objects can not occupy the same space (position) at the
same time, yet in dialectical thought and
practice two or more people can become one in time and in space, in
thought and in practice, according to Nature. The reasoning behind
such 'logic' is that sensuousness, which is common to all
mankind, can be utilized to bring all people experientially into one position at one time, momentarily
(perceptually), creating unity out of many distinct and differing
parts. Thus by 'discovering' and acting upon what man has in common with
nature, sensuousness (feelings put into action), that which divides man from nature,
righteousness (belief put into action) is negated "in theory and in practice," thus
engendering 'unity.'
In the land of Diaprax, the righteous not only must continue
to deny themselves, deny their sensuousness, but also must
continue to count themselves as being dead, as being martyrs (witnesses
of the Lord and His righteousness, i.e. truth) at the
hands of the sensuous, if they are to continue, i.e. endure
(the hate and attack of the sensuous) in
righteousness, if they are to continue following after (living in) Christ,
who suffered likewise.
The following pages are rather redundant (arduous) but, when understood,
explain how the dialectical formula is being used to the negate
the system of righteousness for the cause of 'world peace
and social harmony.' Diaprax is the theory that when a theory-action harmony (reasoning-sensuousness harmony,
where reasoning affirms sensuousness, making
righteousness 'irrational'/'irrelevant') is put into praxis
(social action) it negates a belief-action dichotomy (righteousness-sensuousness duality,
where sensuousness is made subject to righteousness, not
being of it, "repressing" it).
If righteousness and
sensuousness were put into a dialectical formula, as Hegel's A
+ -A = A, it would be R(-s) +
-R(-s) = 'R' or S(-r).
Substituting Righteousness (R) for Hegel's A and then adding
sensuousness suppressed (-s) (the
suppressed desire to 'touch' the tree) we end up
with
Righteousness suppressing
sensuousness or
sensuousness suppressed by Righteousness―R(-s).
Therefore, unseen in Hegel's formula, A is
actually an A with sensuousness suppressed, or A(-s),
what I label R(-s)―Righteousness suppressing sensuousness.
Then by getting A and -A (R and -R, i.e. thesis-antithesis,
i.e. two thesis positions which oppose one another)
to dialogue, to focus upon what the have in common through
conversation (that being their suppressed
sensuousness), they can be brought together (synthesized) upon
sensuousness (we can become at-one-with the world―this is why God
instructs us to "Set your affection on things above, not on
things on the earth." Colossians 3:2) Sensuousness
thus liberates them
from the restraints of Righteousness, their lives now united upon (S) or
Hegel's new = A. By liberating the sensuousness
in each person, with that
which was suppressed by Righteousness, that which divided them,
'Righteousness' is now
made "rationally" subject to, i.e. 'changeable'
to, or relative to the sensuousness which both parties experience
in common. What A and -A or R and -R have in common is their
sensuousness liberated, resulting in S(-r)
or a new 'thesis' (a 'changeable' position, i.e. a soft thesis,
a readily adaptable to 'change,' tolerant of ambiguity thesis). Thus, according to the dialectical formula,
'righteousness' or 'truth' is only knowable in the 'moment,'
i.e.
relative to the situation at hand (subject to environmental conditions,
subject to Nature itself, subject to sensuousness).
Thus Hegel's "= A" is the same as my S(-r).
When sensuousness
is
liberated from the restraints of Righteousness, 'righteousness'
is then only a temporarily opinion (or theory) and therefore becomes subject to
the 'rational' sensuous needs ('R' = S(-r)
and S(-r)
= 'R') of the 'moment' being put into practice, i.e. "sense
experience" known theoretically and practically.
"During this special formative time, this period of
psycho-social moratoria, there is no
‘right’ or ‘wrong’ answer by young people as they reflect on the ‘facts’ they
have learned in a search together for ‘meaning.’” (Richard J. Spady,
Presented November 18, 1994, The College and University Faculty
Assembly, National Council for the Social Studies, Phoenix, Arizona,
1994) "Postmodernity ... describes
a world where people have to make their way without fixed referents and
traditional anchoring points. It is a world of rapid change, of
bewildering instability..." (Usher, Edwards)
This is why, when you try to warn people of the ensuing
dangers of their praxis of (participation in) the dialectical
process of 'changingness,' you get that "deer in the headlight look," the "glassed over"
look in their eyes, since they can only relate to opinions and theories
being
dialogued (emancipating their sensuousness), no longer being
able to accept facts and truth preached and taught (suppressing
their sensuousness). Their 'rightness' ('righteousness') now
resides within sensuousness (in nature, in the 'moment,' in
themselves and the world), placing
their hope in the 'changing'
world, i.e. in its sensuousness, not outside of it (spiritual),
no longer placing their hope and faith in an unchanging God and His Holiness, i.e. in His righteousness
alone.
I write
here of the believer (of those who have been redeemed in Christ) and how
they will be perceived (and treated) by those subjected to
the brainwashing effects of the dialectical process
of 'changingness' and praxis (man fearful of losing what he has
and/or wants to have and fearful of losing the respect and/or approval,
i.e. esteem of men).
Those of the system of righteousness who are not redeemed, i.e.
who are not
righteous in Christ but who have been raised in an environment
of faith, belief, obedience, and chastening, will not "glass over" but
will instead counter (even violently) the
believers' position as being "wrong," theirs being right, since they are
still subject to the conditions of the system of righteousness
(still thinking right-wrong, black-white, good-evil, above-below, etc.),
i.e. suppressing their sensuousness to pre-established truth
taught them by parents, teachers, etc. via. chastening or the treat of
it―R(-s).
Hebrews
12:5-11 is important reading to understand what the system of
Righteousness means ("nevertheless afterward it [chastening]
yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are
exercised thereby.").
Romans 7 :14-25 is important reading to understand the system of
sensuousness ("the flesh the law of sin").
And Genesis 3:1-6
is important reading to understand how the system of reasoning:
seduction, deception,
and manipulation ("Yea, hath God said?" & "You will not
die") uses the system of sensuousness ("nor
touch it" & "saw that it was good ..., pleasing ..., and to be
desired ..." & "ate of it") to
negate the system of righteousness ("Thou shalt
not" & "You will die").
Thus using R(-s) for Righteousness,
rules and commands
inculcated by parents or God suppressing sensuousness
(suppressing your carnal natural desires), and S(-r) for
'righteousness'
(what "seems to be" 'right' for the 'moment')
now being made subject to sensuousness (or 'R' for sensuousness
which "seemeth to be right" in the 'moment,'
i.e. interchangeable with S(-r)),
'righteousness,' dialectically becomes subject to Sensuousness.
By finding what R(-s)
& -R(-s) (thesis and antithesis,
you and the other person who disagrees with you) have in common, that being
sensuousness suppressed (-s), and exposing it
through
roleplaying and dialoguing of opinions, R & -R (you and the other
person) can be synthesized into S(-r) or 'R'
(Hegel's A & -A synthesized into a new A). In
this way,
(-s) + (-s), sensuousness suppressed
in both people, i.e. R + -R (your sensuousness suppressed by rules you
learned from your parents, teachers, etc., and the other person's
sensuousness suppressed by rules learned by their parents, teachers,
etc.) can become S (sensuousness liberated via. dialogue in both R
& -R, i.e. you and the other person) which is then treated as 'R,' i.e. "seems to
be" 'right.' 'Righteousness,' now
subject to sensuousness, where 'truth' is relative to the situation
(the 'moment'), is no
longer perceived as being absolute or sacred for all times and places,
no longer being external to human nature, external to the influence of sensuousness,
thereby suppressing it. This is the "sacred emergence of
nature" or the ordering of the world in a new way, i.e. the "new world
order," where sensuousness is perceived as 'righteousness' and
'righteousness' is perceived as sensuousness. Hegel's "= A"
is therefore
sensuousness 'rationally'
liberated (S) via. dialogue (finding what you have in common
with the other person in regards to personal, uninhibited,
non-inculcated, natural desires), dialectically perceived as and
treated as 'righteousness.' 'Righteousness' is now made subject to Sensuousness
(S(-r)),
negating Righteousness (R(-s) & -R(-s)) as the sole 'meaning'
and 'purpose' of life (a life of faith, belief, obedience, and
chastening and certainty now is 'changed' to a life of doubt, questioning, reasoning, and
changingness and uncertainty). With Sensuousness now becoming
the 'driving purpose' and meaning of life, the system of
reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation has
now become the only accepted, i.e. rational,
pathway to knowing 'righteousness'
Thus R(-s)
(Righteousness suppressing sensuousness) equals
Hegel's A, -R(-s), (another persons
Righteousness suppressing his sensuousness) equals Hegel's -A,
resulting in a thesis-antithesis condition. 'R' (sensuousness
which "seems to be" 'Right') or S(-r)
('righteousness' subject to Sensuousness)
is Hegel's new A, i.e. R & -R or A & -A
(thesis & antithesis; you and the other person) are synthesized
(come to consensus) as a result of
sensuousness being liberated from the suppression of Righteousness
you and the other person came into the meeting with. With this formula man can be 'changed' in
paradigm (changed in the way he thinks and acts from a patriarchal
paradigm of truth and facts―from the father of righteousness,
i.e. authority, through a matriarchal paradigm of feelings―from the
mother of sensuousness, i.e. warmth,
to a heresiarchal paradigm of 'changingness'―from the children of heresy
and tyranny, i.e. of disobedience), so that a "New
World Order" can be created, an order in which all organizations and
associations (public and private) are 'grounded' upon the dialectical
process of 'changingness,' uniting all men upon only that which all men
have in common, sensuousness, which only proceeds from nature
(from the "child within").
Going over this again, what R(-s) and -R(-s)
(what you and the other person, i.e. those who are 'different' in
belief, physical features, etc) have in common is their suppressed sensuousness
(-s), (the result of being taught absolutes
by patriarchal parents, teachers, etc via the system of
righteousness, i.e. the patriarchal paradigm), which, once exposed
through dialogue, can be used to synthesize
R and -R (Hegel's A and -A, i.e. you and the other person), uniting you and the other person
(building human relationships) upon sensuousness, what you and
the other person have in common (the matriarchal paradigm), thus all are becoming. In
this heresiarchal paradigm (the system of reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation), 'R' ('Righteousness') is no longer
established for all times and in all places, suppressing sensuousness
(-s), separating man from his nature,
others, and nature itself, but 'Righteousness' ('R') is now to be
dialectically 'discovered' from within each person (subject to human
sensuousness) through the use of the dialectical process of
'changingness.' By using the
dialectical process (the "scientific process") all men can be 'helped'
(facilitated) to
'discover' what they have in common with each another, the common
element (Hegel's 'spirit' or the Gnostic 'divine spark') being sensuousness suppressed
(-s)
by the 'abnormal' (unnatural, spiritual, religious, neurotic) conditions of Righteousness (R),
righteousness which is not 'in touch' with and thus not in harmony
with Sensuousness (with nature, i.e. human feelings). Thus Hegel's "=
A," being S (sensuousness liberated in both parties through
dialogue and
reasoning) is treated as 'R'
('Righteousness'). Once 'R' ('Righteousness') is
subject to (is equal with, synonymous to) S (Sensuousness), right and wrong is subject
to what is right or wrong according to the environmental 'moment' (subject
to Dopamine emancipation for all). Man is then freed from that (R) Righteousness
which is not in harmony with human 'sensuous needs.' In this way the believer in righteousness,
who does not always act in accordance with this belief (following after
his own sensuousness, seeking Dopamine emancipation over and against
righteousness―and thus sinning―called a "belief-action
dichotomy") can be pulled (enticed, facilitated, deceived and
manipulated) into human-ism
through his participation in
the dialectical process of 'changingness.' "But every
man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when
lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished,
bringeth forth death." James 1:14, 15 By finding other "believers" who can
'support' him in his act of sensuousness, i.e. helping him
'justify' his humanity, and therefore 'justify' the humanity of others,
he can himself along with others become "tolerant of ambiguity," joining with others who
are walking down the same dialectical pathway of the world, to eternal
death. Satan's system of reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation having done its intended
'purpose,' the negation of the system of righteousness
and righteousness itself.
Putting it together again: dialectically, one person's righteousness (R), with his
sensuousness suppressed
(-s) vs. another's
persons righteousness (-R), with his sensuousness suppressed
(-s) results in "neurosis" where both 'parties' are not thinking and acting
properly, 'normally,' "sensibly," i.e. sensuously. This
thesis-antithesis condition produces
alienation,
isolationism, capitalism, 'imperialism,' and war. R(-s)
and -R(-s)
(Hegel's A and -A unsynthesized ) equals isolationism, imperialism, and
war). By finding what R and -R (A + -A) have in common with one
another, i.e. their suppressed sensuousness
(-s),
and getting R and -R to focus upon what they have in common
(-s) via. roleplaying and dialogue, and helping
them find consensus (with the help of a facilitator, since this
outcome does not come naturally) they will
make their 'righteousness' ('R') (now treated as an opinion) subject to their suppressed
sensuousness (-s). In this way
(-s) becomes
'absolute' (S(-r)) or 'right' ('R')
in their own eyes. With 'righteousness' ('R') being
relative, subject to everyone's sensuousness (-s + -s
emancipated and united equals S),
'righteousness' is now "readily adaptable to 'change.'"
Now 'R' (sensuousness which "seems to be" 'right') equals
S(-r)
('righteousness' which is subject to Sensuousness) and
S(-r)
equals
'R.' 'Righteousness' is therefore subject
to sensuousness where consensus (the sensation of 'oneness'
based upon sensuousness)
is the 'righteousness' (rightness, the feeling of being 'right') for the 'moment.'
Liberation, according to the dialectical process of unrighteousness, of
'changingness,' can only be found in
the "sense experience" of oneness outside of (void of) the
system of righteousness. Differences in beliefs and actions between peoples, states, and nations,
i.e. walls which cause war, will be
overcome (negated) by man dialectically 'discovering' and
emancipating common-ism, i.e. thinking and acting according to
that which he
has in common with himself, others and nature, i.e. his sensuous
nature. The 'moment' the woman in the garden in Eden participated
in Satan's facilitation of this dialectical formula (with Adam
following, abdicating his office of authority for the 'purpose' of
sustaining human relationship), all mankind was bound to it's pattern,
only being redeemable from its curse (which is eternal death) by God and His
Word, by to His righteousness alone (which is eternal life).
Thus the yin-yang cycle of
life (a little 'righteousness' in the sensuous and a little sensuousness in
the 'righteous' keeps life in perpetual 'change'―continuous motion)
is all that man can comprehend when he rejects God's righteousness. In dialectical thought, the
system of righteousness (the patriarchal paradigm) is a condition which must be
negated, i.e. must be perceived as being 'irrational,' and therefore
must be treated
as 'irrelevant' if a person it to keep up in a "rapidly changing world" (in a yin-yang
world), thus making the system of righteousness more easily
expunged from the environment. If the person
and society are to be freed, i.e. freed to achieve synthesis, they
must be free to manifest the system of
sensuousness,
where Dopamine emancipation (sensuousness) is available to 'all' (at
least that is what the dialectical 'promise' or 'hope' is) and then be
free to use
it to
negate the system of righteousness. The
scriptures warns us that when man trusts in man, when he depends upon
the system of sensuousness, he is cursed. Thus,
disregarding the Word of God, man is dialectically becoming "the 'All,'"
(as god)
via. sensuousness negating righteousness. By dialectically
making sensuousness, 'righteousness,' i.e. by making
'righteousness' sensuousness, man is liberate
from that righteousness which can only come from God, i.e. that
righteousness which suppresses sensuousness (restraining
and judging man's carnal nature, judging his theory and his
practice as being evil, i.e. as being wicked, i.e. as being not of
God, i.e. as being unrighteous). The error in dialectical thinking,
that man is suppressed (repressed) when 'made subject' to
righteousness, is due to man's inability to comprehend the Love,
Joy, and Peace which can only come from the Lord, through the believers
faith in Christ Jesus and by the presence and working of the Holy Spirit
in the believers life.
Due to the spiraling nature of 'changingness,' the system
of sensuousness is only
satisfactory for a short period of time and must be repeated indefinitely,
requiring 'change' forever (by force if necessary) for the sake of the 'All,'
i.e. 'the people'―a
Gnostic construct. Thus, the meaning of life, or "truth,"
resides within the 'momentary' sensation (the fleeting experience) of "All is
well with me and my environment" (wholeness) as the 'We' unite in the 'moment' of
actualized sensation of 'change.' The 'purpose' of life then becomes,
dialectically, the same sensation (experience) for all participants in the
process of 'change,' "All is well
with 'us' and the world" (globalism) via. the dialectical process
of 'changingness' being put
into praxis (social action proceeding from consensus).
"Truth is [therefore] a 'moment' in correct praxis." (Antonio
Gramsci, Prison Notebooks) 'Truth' is only
'discoverable,' dialectically, within the 'momentary' experience of
oneness with self, others, and nature. Thus dialectical 'truth'
can only be found within the human experience of sensuousness
and can never be found outside of it, i.e. outside of Nature.
Truth not from nature, truth greater than man's experience with nature,
i.e. truth being God, i.e. unquestionable and unchallengeable
righteousness would negate the dialectical process of
'changingness,' would
negate 'truth' dependent upon sensuousness. The process of
'change' is thus applicable to all events of life, public and 'private,'
secular and 'sacred,' only within the praxis of the system
of sensuousness negating the system of
righteousness (as was the praxis of Genesis 3:1-6).
For example, in the Total Quality Management environment (quality
meaning an aesthetic sensation of oneness), half of the meeting is
focused upon 'changing' the physical environment, the other half at
'changing' human relationships (building common-unity) via. the system of sensuousness, i.e. via. dialoguing opinions, and
finding consensus, both, the
participants and the environment, become united upon 'changingness,' with
'group' meetings required for every 'change,' for 'life.' The
objective of making something 'new' (innovation) as well as the 'changing' of how people
think, feel, and act (paradigm 'shift'), now becomes the 'driving purpose' of the
meaning of life (all
individuals becoming 'purpose driven' with the 'driving purpose' of
oneness becoming all there is to life). "This is so
much us. How can you fight something which makes you 'feel' so good."
(response by my wife, Karen)
The truth being known, like a drug addict, participants soon learn the
'feelings' can only be re-initiated or sustained by the repeated practice of the process
(on themselves and others),
repeating forever the dialectical process of 'changingness' negating righteousness for the sake of
sensuousness.
Somewhere in here a person's life becomes hollow and life itself becomes
cheap. "Yet, who is God's God?" "Psychotherapists who are
deeply depressed and who know that they must be their own superbeing,
their own intercessor, are more apt to plunge into final despair." "I
have often thought that the inordinately high suicide rate among
psychiatrists was one tragic commentary on this dilemma." (Irvin
Yalom, Theory and Practice and Group Psychotherapy) Only by practicing the process of 'change' on others ('helping'―deceiving
and manipulating―the 'uneducated' to become at-one-with themselves, others, and the
world, all in the environment of 'change') is there any 'meaning' or
'purpose' to life. Thus, they are possessed by the process of
'change,' i.e. 'driven' by their carnal nature uniting with the world,
becoming as "One," i.e. as 'god.' As 'god' they can
not have God before them, no longer being able to 'perceive' themselves
as accountable to anything outside their own common, sense based, carnal flesh,
eyes, and reasoning, i.e. consciousness leading to
self-consciousness leading to reasoning, i.e. thesis
leading to antithesis leading to synthesis, i.e. object
leading to subject leading to object-subject oneness, i.e. either-or leading
to 'another'―the deception (lie) is that there is
'another,' there is no 'another,' there is only either-or, i.e. the
dialectical process of 'changingness' (the other way) is the praxis of illusion
(a lie) being treated as
reality (the truth) thus 'changing' reality (the truth) into an illusion
(a lie), resulting in all
becoming nothingness, i.e. lawless, i.e. with only sensuous
laws restraining sensuousness, i.e. sensuous laws
negating laws of righteousness, the delusion of illusion
negating reality by perceiving itself as being reality.
“In the aesthetic imagination, sensuousness generates universally valid principles for an objective order. The two main categories defining this order are 'purposiveness without purpose' — i.e. beauty, 'lawfulness without law' — i.e. freedom. 'Zweckmässigkeit ohne Zweck; Gesetzmässigkeit ohne Gesetz'” [Hegel] “Whatever the object may be (thing or flower, animal or man), it is represented and judged not in terms of its usefulness, not according to any purpose it may possible serve, and also not in view of it ‘internal’ finality and completeness." (Herbart Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud)
Objects (including people) in the environment
take on importance only in regards to their ability (potential) to
stimulate Dopamine emancipation for social
health and welfare (drugs being used as 'uppers' to enhance behavior for
Dopamine emancipation―augmenting
that which engenders pleasure for
all, and as 'downers' to inhibit or block behavior which inhibits or
blocks Dopamine emancipation―negating
that which engenders pain for all). If virtual reality
(illusion) can replace
an
object, that will suffice (the object thus being expendable). In that way,
property, labor, and human life ("human resource") is based upon social need (everyone's "sensuous
needs," for the manifestation of Love―Eros),
i.e. the 'owner' (caretaker) of property, labor, and human life is conscientized
to environmental conditions (conscious of 'social' sensual needs) which guarantees that all
individuals feel 'good,' i.e. get Dopamine emancipation, when they look upon
or work on 'his' property (when they have anything to do with property,
labor, or life itself―justifying taking the
property, labor, and life of its own citizens, i.e. oppressing and
killing its own citizens who inhibit or block or are 'perceived' as
having the potential of inhibiting or blocking the stimulation of
Dopamine emancipation, for the common 'good').
His property, his labor, and his own life is no longer his own property (the private
in private property only being an illusion) but rather is now the premises
of the common-sensuous-unity (community).
His labor (and life) is
now subject to
its common "sensuous needs" and its perception of 'environmental
needs and demands' for the potential of Dopamine emancipation for the 'all.'
Like the "all seeing eye,"
what
Diaprax see's (wants) it
perceives as it owns (nothing is impossible to attain, in its thoughts and to its
actions). "Hell and destruction are never full;
so the eyes of man are never satisfied." Proverbs 27:20
"The King's horses are the peoples horses." (Marx)
"If a socialist-environmentalist sees your property, in his mind's
eye he owns it. Then when he attains authority he will use his power
to control and "improve" your property, now his property, with you
staying on as his 'caretaker,' providing you cooperate and do things "his
way." What the Babylonian emissary sees in the Temple is Babylon's property, God's tree
(the forbidden tree) is the woman and Adam's
property, your property, be it your land, your money, your business, or
your children, is the socialist, common-ist, democratic governments land,
money, business, and children. What it sees (or thinks it sees)
is its (in its thoughts and its actions to bestialize, i.e. humanize, and enjoy as its
own). When the system
of sensuousness comes under the influence and control of the
system of reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation, all
property (that which is of the system of righteousness, be it even
the soul's of men) is perceived as being under its influence and control
and must therefore be used for its own 'purpose,' i.e. the propagation
of humanism, environmentalism, democracy, socialism, common-ism,
globalism, etc (all for the sake of Dopamine emancipation). In this way, reality, that which "is"
declaring what "is" and what "is not" right (righteousness
restraining sensuousness, i.e. Dopamine emancipation), becomes an illusion, i.e. is perceived as being
irrational
and thus is treated as irrelevant, and therefore can be 'justly' negated (annihilated), and
illusion, that which "can be" "sense perceived" only
becomes 'reality,' (reality is engendered in the
'ought' being actualized through the negation of the "Thou shalt not"
in every man's life, i.e. in society, i.e. Dopamine emancipation of, by,
and for
those of the "All seeing eye"). Thus, "sense experience," must become the 'meaning'
of and 'purpose' for life, peace, and 'justice.' Desire (man's lust), and the objects
in the environment which stimulate it
(the world, the things of the environment), thus become one (perceived as being one in 'meaning' and
in 'purpose'), not in man's acquisition and control
of the object in the environment for himself alone (or for God, his family,
state, or nation alone) but
in the sensation of Dopamine emancipation itself of, by, and for the
"All," i.e. for the "village" (for the all who participate in
Lucifer's Genesis
3:1-6 project of negating the "negative" system of
righteousness, i.e. negating the negative system
of faith, belief, obedience, and chastening). Not that in mans
hands the system of righteousness makes man perfect
(righteous). Dad and mom aren't perfect. But the office, the
system of righteousness, is. But when the feeling of "allness" takes on a life of its own in each
person, who is now possessed in its creation and sustentation,
controlled by it in their
every thought and action, the office of the parent, the system of
righteousness restraining the system of sensuousness,
is negated.
Reality is
thus, dialectically, found in man initiating and sustaining the "positive" environment of
'change,' of sensuousness, seeking and finding harmony (uniting meaning and purpose) with nature in the 'moment,'
negating the "negative" environment of 'unchangingness,'
i.e. negating a recognition of man's need for righteousness,
i.e. man having relationship with the creator of the heavens and the earth, i.e.
God, by faith in His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ.
Illusion is thus perceived as being anything which inhibits or blocks man's union with nature and
nature's union with man, i.e. illusion being the system of
righteousness preventing the aesthetic dimension
(the dialectical process of 'changingness') from negating the acquisition of
the property
of and for the individual (a position to stand
upon, like a rock, not movable) as the meaning and purpose of life
(righteousness, imputed by Christ alone, being the greatest
'acquisition') thus preventing the "new" world order, an order of
"oneness," from emerging from the diverse parts, i.e. from
sensuous man divided against himself because of the system of righteousness
becoming one in the negation of the system of
righteousness. In this way government, under socialist
control (using environmentalist propaganda), can accumulate lands, forcing
citizens off their own private lands (into public housing) or reclassify
them as 'premises,' with public support (public indifference,
i.e. fearful that the gratifying objects which are under
their control, which stimulate Dopamine emancipation for them personally,
might be taken away from them by the government if they intervene on the
side of righteousness). Brainwashed
people can no longer comprehend that freedom and private ownership come
only through liberty, through that which is only available under the system of righteousness,
by man standing for truth with their honour, property, and their very
own lives, depending upon the divine intervention of God.
Once the general
public perceives (sensuously), the value of the citizens land, labor,
and life to be of
greater value to the consumers (general publics) pleasure than to the producers
(individuals) profit or gain
(which tend not to be as sensuously pleasing to the general publics
eye, or as accessible for pleasure to the general public, when under his control), public acquisition and use of private lands, labor, and life can be more easily initiated
and sustained, the land, labor, and life (body parts) then being
'better' used for social cause, i.e. the socialists' "sensuous needs."
Whoever you let control your mind's eye, your perception, your
imagination, controls your thoughts and your actions (your day). Does God
have control over your eyes (your mind, your thoughts, your affections), by your faith in
His Word which comes by hearing, by the preaching and teaching of his
revealed Word, i.e. not of human opinions, or does Satan and the world
control your eyes (your mind, your thoughts, your affections), by the dialoguing of your
lusts for the pleasures of the things of this world which you have in
common with the world?
"And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By
hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall
see, and shall not perceive: For this people’s heart is waxed gross,
and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed;
lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with
their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be
converted, and I should heal them." Matthew 13:14, 15
By 'shifting' the "carrot and stick" method from an "obey
and be blessed" or "disobey and be cursed" system, where
blessing or chastening, i.e. control over life and its standards, is
directed from a source above or greater than the system of
sensuousness, creating and enforcing an environment initiating
and sustaining a system of righteousness; a top-down,
class, hierarchy, closed system, to a "carrot and stick" method where "participation in the
dialectical process of 'changingness' (sensuousness) will result
in an experience of social approval (sensual
support), but refusal to participate in (or opposition to) the
dialectical process of 'changingness' will result in an experience of being
perceived as being 'irrational' in thought and
being treated as 'irrelevant' in action, i.e. you will experience social
rejection (sensual censorship) from below via. the system of sensuousness;"
an equality of opportunity, taxonomized, classless, 'open' system―where
the duality of right and wrong will no longer be determined by
pre-established rules restraining or blocking the 'changingness' of
sensuousness but rather right and wrong (good and evil) will be determined
situationally, i.e. according to a spectrum of
sensuousness, where the worth or value of life (feelings, thoughts,
and action) will be weighed
according to where along a spectrum (or continuum), at any given moment,
a person is experiencing physical, mental, and social pain or physical,
mental, and social pleasure, with the greatest pain being at the lower
end of the spectrum and greatest pleasure being at the higher end of the spectrum,
i.e. the system of righteousness being at the lower end of
the spectrum, where it is perceived as interfering with pleasure or the
pursuit of pleasure).
In this way of thinking and acting, by man's participation within
the process of 'change,' by his selling of his soul to the collective
sensuous experience of 'discovering' (imagining and creating) a world of
pleasure,
the process of 'change' wins the day for 'changingness,' i.e.
where
"positive social change," the augmentation of
spontaneity and sensuousness―physical,
mental, and social pleasure―produces a world of sensuous
peace and common-istic harmony (requiring consensus) negates
"negative
social control," the negating of "negative" chastening,
where physical,
mental, and social pain is used to produce a "peaceful fruit
of righteousness," the negating of an 'un-natural'
system which blocks or inhibits spontaneity
and sensuousness (making them subject to laws and
rules established and enforced by a higher authority or 'force' greater than the "sense
experience" of the 'moment'), the
negating of 'force field' which is not 'influence' by nor
manipulatable by sensuousness―a 'negative field of force'
requiring conformation, or at least a majority vote).
As Kenneth Benne wrote: we
"must develop
persons who see non-influenceability of private convictions in joint
deliberations as a vice rather than a virtue. It is in this sense that
democratic planning for change must be anti-individualistic."
(Kenneth
Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)
To limit despotism (the system of
reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation) in government, the
legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government were limited
to their specific jurisdiction, not given power to usurp the others
position in the National, State, County, Township, Village government,
leaving all branches in tact in only one office, the home, so that
faith, belief, obedience, and chastening could be used to develop the
conscience, thus developing the greatest liberty for the citizens of the
next generation, as individual citizens using a system of
righteousness to determine right from wrong, good from evil, having
the right of 'freedom of the conscience,' which is only possible with a
government restraining the system of reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation, restraining the system of
tyranny and despotism. By the educators, the media, and government
'shifting' their way of thinking and acting ('theory and practice')
to "sense experience" (consensus, where
"common sense," i.e. parochial thought and action, was overtaken
with 'theory and practice,' i.e. socialist thought and action,
and transformed into "good sense"―"Philosophy ["philosophy
of praxis"] is criticism and the superseding of religion and
'common sense'. In this sense it coincides with 'good' as opposed
to 'common' sense." Antonio Gramsci While "common
sense" is the property of a privileged few, fundamentalism,
i.e. unchanging, i.e. tying present and more than likely future actions
to the past, "good sense" is common to all, organic, i.e.
'changing,' i.e. liberating present and thus future actions from the
past by evaluating and reinterpreting ("rewriting") past actions in the
'light' of "sense perceived" present and future "sensuous
needs"―Dopamine, i.e. human emancipation), tyranny and despotism
now rules over the citizens and their land (the citizen and 'his' land
is now managed by a collectivist voice, i.e. a professional
managerial class).
With dialectical 'logic,' common-ism and
capital-ism become one in the consensus 'moment,' in an
individual-social, public-private partnership where Dopamine
emancipation for all becomes the 'justification' for controlling social action (praxis)
and changing the environment (the removal of inhibiting or blocking
conditions, that is the negation of the righteous who perpetuate the system of
righteousness).
Thus the 'driving' force for the 'purpose'
of life becomes the 'change' process itself (the augmentation of pleasure,
i.e. sensuousness) with everyone working together for the common
cause of self preservation and social approval. Anyone inhibiting or
blocking the sensual (incestuous) union between man and the
environment (the self-other-nature relationship based upon sensuousness)
must either be re-educated (their brain washed of the patriarchal paradigm,
the system of righteousness) or removed (being perceived as being
irrational, thus irrelevant, i.e.
worthless or expendable for the sake of social welfare and
prosperity, they are extruded―abortion, euthanasia, 'dying with
dignity,' i.e. which is affirmative action, etc.). Either way, the patriarchal paradigm is
negated (patricide), with social approval (they can hardly
wait to have you with your set way of doing things, out of their life).
The system of
sensuousness, under the facilitation of
reasoning:
seducers, deceivers,
and manipulators, is no different than Hitler's system to exterminate
the Jews (purifying the world of a race), but this time the focus is upon
the extermination of a way of thinking (purifying the world of the patriarchal paradigm,
i.e. liberating "pure man" Hegel), the gas chambers being
replaced with facilitated, consensus meetings used to 'discover' good
and bad paradigms, neutralizing, marginalizing and removing (aborting, expediting the termination
of life of) the worthless paradigms, initiating, sustaining, and utilizing the paradigms of worth for
the social cause of 'change,' negating the system of
righteousness and those who espouse it (being perceived as being
"barnacles to the ship of progress"). 
Instead of the heart of man
being changed by the work of Christ, his righteousness now
no longer being of his nature (of a lie) but in Christ (in truth), his
thoughts and actions now being directed by God, making him an individual
amongst individuals, all under God (a free people with some believing
but most not, but all having the God given right of "freedom of the
conscience," from where we get "inalienable rights"), the driving force for 'change' will be the
'change' process itself (the system of deceiving and manipulating,
initiating and sustaining the system of sensuousness in the praxis
of negating the system of righteousness,
within the
individual and thus collectively within society, for the sake of the 'All,'
with the emergent outcome, like a termite hill, being the product
of the 'All' united in a common sensuous cause to "serve
and protect" the 'All,' the 'sensuous,' all serving
and protecting "human rights").
Whether for an
individual, family, village, national, or global 'purpose' it is all of
the system of sensuousness, i.e. of the world, i.e. of the
flesh, of the eyes, and of the pride of life.
"For all that is in
the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the
pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16
When you reject the righteousness which can only come from the
Lord, Gods only begotten Son, freely imputed to
all who believe upon Him (John 3:16), sensuousness is all that you have left
to work with (in your foolish effort to create a world of 'peace' and
'harmony' from your own fallen nature).
"Love not the world, neither the things that are in
the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in
him." "And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he
that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." John 2:15, 17
Concerning those building the termite hill (the emerging
'new' world order of "We working for us"), the scriptures tell us
of their future: "the flood came and washed them all away,"
i.e. the nations, i.e. all souls, will be judged by God and be found
wanting. "For as in the
days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying
and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, And
knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the
coming of the Son of man be." Matthew 24:38, 39
"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness
and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;"
Rom 1:18 For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean
person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in
the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no man deceive you with vain
words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the
children of disobedience. Be not ye therefore partakers with them.
Ephesians 5:5-7
This process, the dialectical process of 'changingness' (sensuousness) where dialogue
is used as the means of acquiring the "secret" (sensuous) desires of the "people," is used for the 'purpose' of
'discovering' (and thereby building) common ground, whereby righteousness
(that which causes walls of division between people) can be broken
down for the sake of social-global unity (equality and unity based upon the liberation of
Dopamine emancipation for 'all'). That praxis of unity
of Dopamine emancipation (sensuousness) is then being used to annihilate any condition of "un-natural" restraint of
Dopamine emancipation (negation of righteousness). The
"lawless
one" (the "Orphic-narcissistic-aesthetic Christ," i.e. the
"Gnostic savior," who first
appeared to man in the garden in Eden) can then rule a world
of lawlessness (where sensuousness rules), basing its identity and
'purpose' upon Dopamine emancipation for the 'all,' i.e. the 'people.' Thus Sodom and Gomorrah, the sensuous ("sensible") people,
can rule the world,
with pleasure for 'all,' i.e. with sensuousness negating the
'un-natural' rules of restraint, righteousness, by making it
at-one-with sensuousness―a "New World
Order" where transparency negates privacy by making it
at-one-with transparency, that which is everybody's business, the public, negates that which is nobody's business, the private, by making it
at-one-with everybody's business, the temporal negates the spiritual
by making it at-one-with the temporal, that which is below negates
that which is above by making it at-one-with that which is below, all
become one via. dialoguing to consensus and then
putting 'common' social desire (collective sensuousness―consensus) into action (praxis), "theory and
practice," negating the preaching and teaching of righteousness,
negating the source of the walls of
division, negating the source of alienation,
negating fundamental
(unchanging) religion, negating faith, belief, obedience in/to God and His Word,
negating
fearing God and loving His Word of righteousness by the praxis
of
fearing man and loving this life of sensuousness.
Those who praxis the dialectical process are 'driven' with the
'purpose' of annihilating those who put all their trust in the
Lord, those who can stand alone, alienated from the world, i.e.
established forever in His righteousness, trusting not in the
sensuousness and 'reasoning' abilities of man (not even trusting
their own nature). “For
to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain.” Philippians
1:21
“Alienation is the experience of ‘estrangement’ (Verfremdung) from others, . . .” “Alienation has a long history. Its most radical sense already appears in the biblical expulsion from Eden.” “Alienation, according to Feuerbach, derives from the externalization (Entausserung) of human powers and possibilities upon a non-existent entity: God. . .” “God is thus the anthropological source of alienation . . .” “Alienation will continue so long as the subject engages in an externalization (Entausserung) of his or her subjectivity.” (Stephen Erik Bronner, Of Critical Theory and its Theorists) “The more of himself man attributes to God, the less he has left in himself.” (Karl Marx, Selected Reading in Sociology and Social Philosophy by T. B. Bottomore) “The only practically possible emancipation is the unique theory which holds that man is the supreme being for man.” (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right) “The struggle against religion is therefore indirectly a struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.” (Karl Marx, MEGA I/1/1) “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the sentiment of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.” “Freud speaks of religion as a ‘substitute-gratification’– the Freudian analogue to the Marxian formula, ‘opiate of the people.’" “If there is a universal neurosis, it is reasonable to suppose that its core is religion.... Psychoanalysis must treat religion as a neurosis.” (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) “. . . Definition of religious experience as experience of absolute dependence is the definition of the masochistic experience in general.” (Erich Fromm, Escape from Freedom) “Freud ... stressed the role of religion in the historical deflection of energy from the real improvement of the human condition to an imaginary world of eternal salvation...." (Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud)
"That is why the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another. The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic can not stand." "The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least can not stand." "The walls between races and tribes, natives and immigrants, Christians and Muslims and Jews can not stand. These hallowed walls we must tear down." (Obama in Berlin, July 2008)
Nationalism, capitalism, private family and business, and most of all, faith in the only true and living God, belief only in His only begotten son, Jesus Christ, and obedience made possible only by the work of the Holy Spirit in our lives, which exposes the world of its wickedness, "we must tear down." By seeking to "tear down the walls" of righteousness, "walls" established by God, by seeking to destroy the individual who stands for right or good and exposes and stands against that which is wrong or evil, according to the way of righteousness, by seeking to destroy the individual who is established no longer upon the world system of sensuousness, i.e. where we derive our 'inalienable rights') our 'leaders' have declared war upon their own 'citizens' with few seeming to care or know about the consequences, i.e. their lose of freedom (freedom of the conscience). Since the leaders promise the citizens a potential life of pleasure, i.e. a world of peace and social harmony, i.e. if they all 'join' with them and work together to achieve it, the 'citizens' have become slaves to those of the system of reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation. They are blinded by their lust for Dopamine emancipation, 'driven' by their addiction to the system of sensuousness, and have now become slaves to the 'rational' seducers, deceivers, and manipulators of the "new" world order. Falling under the influence of fallen man (facilitators of 'change,' void of and anathematized against righteousness) they are being lead down the pathway of pleasure to their death. The banner behind their 'leaders' reads "Death to America(ns)" but the citizens can not read it, being intoxicated by the rhetoric of the 'good' life for "the 'all,'" only made possible, according to the leaders, if "we" all work together for "the 'all,'" i.e. the 'all' being those of their mindset, of their paradigm, of their brotherhood or fraternity, of their common-ist praxis of the dialectical process.
What is missing in all of this is that man is not good (righteous).
On this one point, man and society are 'good' as they become one
in Nature, the dialectical process stands. On this one point, man
is wicked before a Holy and Pure God, the dialectical process falls. Apart from God
man is wicked and deceitful, bound to his body of flesh
(the
system of sensuousness, which only "seems to be good" in the 'moment' of
pleasure). Despite man's 'best' effort to use the system of righteousness
for good (Hebrews 12:6-11), without the righteousness of Christ,
righteousness imputed
to whoever has faith in Christ, repents of their sins before Him, believes upon
the only begotten Son of God, Jesus Christ,
i.e. His virgin birth, His life in
the flesh, but not of it, His death on the
cross, i.e. His willful obedience to His Heavenly Father, shedding His blood for the covering of man's sins, and His
resurrection from the grave for man's hope of eternal life in glory―without
a man laying his life
"on the altar of God," giving his life to Lord, to do as He wills,
he will only use it for his own pleasure, i.e. he remains 'vain,' having no hope of true and everlasting peace,
joy, love, and life. The system of righteousness, in man's hands,
only produces a civil government (government, at its highest form, restrained by
"'inalienable' rights," i.e. rights given by the God of nature, i.e.
rights not from nature itself, to the individual (who is
the government), with those serving in government serving and protecting the individual, so he
can have freedom of religion and conscience, both proceeding from the system
of righteousness; 'gesellschaft,' being a social construct shaped
by the individual's interest only, i.e. impersonal relationship with
others guided by his personal interests, making him able to stand
alone on principle when necessary, not being controlled by the anxiety
of the 'moment,' not compromising truth and principle in the
'moment' of crisis, not 'driven' by the fear of loss of property,
family, or his own life, not 'driven' by the fear of lose of approval of
men, i.e. the group. “Be careful [anxious] for nothing; but in
everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your
requests be made known unto God. And the peace of God, which
passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through
Christ.” Philippians 4:6, 7
The system of righteousness
is a structure where
right and wrong (the freedom of the conscience of the individual) limits the
excess of human behavior in the home, at work, in government, in the church, etc.
where
God, over the parent, the boss, the citizens, the fellowship (suppressing
tyranny, anarchy, despotism, heresy, etc. if all have freedom of the conscience), inhibits or blocks social-ism,
human-ism, common-ism, global-ism, i.e. democracy―"the tyranny of
the masses." The system of
reasoning:
seduction, deception, and
manipulation is a structure where consensus via.
tolerance of ambiguity (a form of government initiating and sustaining "'human' rights," i.e.
rights engendered of, by, and for social praxis, where the system of
sensuousness for the "all," i.e. freedom of sensuousness,
freedom of the super-ego, i.e. the uniting of the id ("I want")
and the ego ("I will"), negates the
system of
righteousness for the 'purpose of the sensation of 'oneness,' i.e. serving and protecting society
from the individual―annihilating "the private interest of each individual against all."
(Hegel,
Philosophy of Right)―while attempting not to
"absorb" the individual; 'gemeinschaft' being a social construct shaped by social interest only, i.e.
interpersonal relationship with others, i.e.
sensuousness, i.e. fear, anxiety ("What is going to happen to me?") being the 'drive' and
pleasure ("We working together for us.") being the 'purpose' of peace,
'joy,' i.e. lust,
'love,' i.e. Eros, and 'life,' i.e. death), negates the
system of righteousness
(faith, belief, obedience, and chastening). Dietrich Bonheoffer, for example, built his
theology on the latter construct, using the first, gesellschaft, as only
a means to that end, i.e. gemeinschaft (building a 'liberated,'
,emancipated, society from the socially disenfranchised).
"The more this investigation has considered the significance of the sociological category for theology, the more clearly has emerged the social intention of all the basic Christian concepts. 'Person,' 'primal state,' 'sin,' and 'revelation' can be fully comprehended only in reference to socialite [gemeinschaft]." "God does not desire a history of individual human beings, but the history of the human community [gemeinschaft]. However, God does not want a community that absorbs the individual into itself, but a community of human beings. In God's eyes, community and individual exist in the same moment and rest in one another." (Dietrich Bonheoffer, Sanctorum Communio. 13, SC-E 21 ,51, SC-E 80) Bold added “What The Authoritarian Personality was really studying was the character type of a totalitarian rather than an authoritarian society ─ fostered by a familial crisis in which traditional parental authority was under fire.” (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality) “A new emphasis on civic participation and social interaction alone seemed capable of confronting the crisis. And, that is precisely what Fromm provided in his notion of ‘communitarian socialism.’” (Stephen Eric Bronner, Of Critical Theory and its Theorists)
Theologians follow the same route when they lean to their own understanding instead of trusting in the lord with all their heart, using the office they 'serve' in to advance their common-ist (Genesis 3:1-6) agenda.
"One reason Tillich is unwilling to openly disavow religion is that he must be accepted as a theologian in order to formulate and gain acceptance of an imaginative Grand Synthesis of theology and philosophy." (Leonard Wheat, Paul Tillich's Dialectical Humanism) “Religion finds itself peculiarly tailored to the nationalistic, class, and ethnic cleavages and outlooks that sustain the prevailing social order. We can hope that this convergence of theological, sociological, and psychological analysis will lead to a further cooperation between behavior and religious disciplines. Here lies the pastor’s task, his opportunity, and his challenge.” (The Person in Psychology, Selected Essays by Gordon Allport)
"For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?" Matthew 16:24-26
In
the same temptations which Satan threw at the woman in the garden in
Eden, the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the
pride of
life, (all tied to Dopamine emancipation and the desire to control the
environment for more) Jesus responded with the word of God, i.e. "It is written ...,"
instead of his opinion of the word of God, i.e. "I think" and
"I feel,"
as the woman did ("I feel like touching the fruit." and "I
think the fruit is good to eat."). Satan began with "It is written ..." in a
temptation against Jesus with Jesus countering Satan's deceitful use of
the word of God with "It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the
Lord thy God." Matthew 4:7 Many deceivers do the
same today, quoting the scriptures
"For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand
hills." Psalms 50:10 and "But my God shall supply all your
need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus."
Philippians 4:19, tempting God by justifying their "lust for the things
of this life" and making God subject to their "sensuous needs" and their
"sense perception" of how things "ought" to be (making God subject to
their "pride of this life," subject to their sensuousness). God's love is
not sensual (temporal) but righteous (spiritual). To
confuse the two is to play the Devils game.
God loves you and me but He will not move from his Word (that which is
spiritual and righteous) for any of us. God can never negate his
law, which exposes our love of sensuousness, because He loves us
in His righteousness.
To make
God (his love) subject to your
sensuousness is to tempt him into being that which he is not,
like you (sensuous), thus making you what you are not, like him (righteous).
This truth negates Diaprax, the system of
reasoning:
seduction,
deception, and manipulation. " For thine is the
kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen."
Matthew 6:13
"Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God. Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." 2 Thessalonians 3:3-12
Those possessed by the dialectical process
of 'changingness' (those
'driven' by the system of reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation for the 'purpose' of
initiating and sustaining the system of sensuousness ) know
the consequence of their praxis, yet
refuse to repent of their sin
because of their love of this world and their love of the
praises of men. Being full of "the pride of life" they
are unable to understand that the bride of Christ, the true church (the
church of righteousness, i.e. in, by, and for Christ) is not a
social institution of this world's making (a church of sensuousness,
i.e. of, by, and for man).
"If the 'restoring of life' of the world is to be conceived in terms of the
Christian revelation, then Marx must collapse into a bottomless abyss."
(Jürgen Habermas, Theory and Practice) Not only Marx, but the
total of philosophy, psychology, anthropology, etc., can not overcome man's day
of reckoning (being weighed, i.e. judged) before God (according to His
way, i.e. His will). Any and all effort by man
to bring peace to himself and this world via. his thoughts and actions is
futile (angst
always remains). They may in fact be unable
to repent of their sin because they, perceiving sin as being an act of
repression upon human
nature (sin as being the alienation of man from himself and the rest of the
world), can not comprehend the full consequences of their sin, only giving lip
service to quite any opposition, substituting guilt (for harming or alienating
others feelings) for sin, and social effort (to make this a "better" world for
all to live in) for righteousness. Perceiving Christ as suffering
and dying on the cross for a social cause (as one suffering for the
disenfranchised, the oppressed, the alienated) negates his death on the
cross to impute God's righteousness unto men of faith, and
therefore results in perceiving Christ's resurrection from the grave as
being irrational, being irrelevant to the hope, that hope can only be
found in this world, found in this life, the hope of happiness, which is
pleasure, which is in the mind, and which is therefore Dopamine
emancipation, of the system of
sensuousness, stimulated by the environment (by the world).
Diaprax thus makes hope in a life which is not
of this world irrelevant, i.e., negating hope in the world to come,
negating a world which is not of man's perception and making,
i.e. not of man's theory and practice. Even though men may
verbally give lip service to hope in a life to come they define it, and
therefore try to shape it according to the here-and-now (sensuousness and
pleasure), according to "eyes which are human
eyes, and ears which are human ears."
(Karl Marx) They can then justify to themselves a life of
pleasure and approval of men (Christian men working together to alleviate suffering, while
living in pleasure, being the gospel message) until life becomes full of
tribulation where God will then 'zap' them up to heaven for a life of
more pleasure. This theory and
practice is not from the Word of God.
"For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God? And if the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear? Wherefore let them that suffer according to the will of God commit the keeping of their souls to him in well doing, as unto a faithful Creator." 1 Peter 4:17-19 "But and if ye suffer for righteousness' sake, happy are ye: and be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled; But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear: Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ. For it is better, if the will of God be so, that ye suffer for well doing, than for evil doing." 1 Peter 3:14-17 "The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together." Romans 8:13-17
Man
errors in his understanding of God's way, perceiving God's word through
his thoughts and his actions, not walking by faith, by God's
righteousness, but rather walking by sight, i.e. thinking and acting
according to his own sensuousness.
"But as
it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the
heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him."
1 Corinthians 2:9 Thus human perception (and therefore human
reasoning) fails when it comes to the things of God. No matter how
theological or religious the person or the institution might be, they are limited
by their sense perception which is bound to the things of this world (sensuousness)
and therefore they lust after the things of this world, being
discontent and murmurers against the things of righteousness, by
force "taking that which
is not theirs to take."
"Not that I speak in respect of want: for I have
learned, in whatsoever state I am, therewith to be content. I know
both how to be abased, and I know how to abound: every where and in
all things I am instructed both to be full and to be hungry, both to
abound and to suffer need." Philippians 4:11, 12
Unless you are dead to
yourself (sensuousness no longer is in control of your life)
and alive in Christ
(made alive in his righteousness―sensuousness therefore
being made subject
to righteousness, i.e. the system of sensuousness being made subject to
the system of righteousness, via. faith, belief, obedience, and chastening;
faith in the Father, belief upon His Son, obedience to Him through the
working of the Holy Spirit within you, and chastening to bring you back
from the temptations of sensuousness, i.e. righteousness being imputed to you from Christ and His Holy
Spirit in you) you can not comprehend
the things of God, you can only consider (perceive) them as being
foolish in the 'light' of your 'reasoning,' leaning to your
own understanding, which is being 'driven' by
the system of sensuousness, i.e. 'discovering' 'meaning'
and 'purpose' in life through being facilitated within the praxis
of the system of reasoning:
seduction, deception, and
manipulation, i.e. subject only to the carnal "avoid pain - approach
pleasure" spectrum of Nature.
Where all political, 'conservative,' groups fall short in their efforts to stop
the dialectical process of 'changingness' (social-ism, common-ism, common-unity), is
in their having to use the system of sensuousness (Dopamine
emancipation) and
'change' (compromise) to keep
their organization together (united) for the 'common good' of their
organization. Without the deceitful and wicked heart of man being
changed from sensuousness to righteousness (by the righteousness
which can only come from God), the heart of man, and all
organizations and institutions which proceed from it, simply remains subject to man's lust
for objects of gratification which stimulate Dopamine emancipation―all
men, "conservatives" and "liberals" alike, not being
benefactors of His righteousness remain "lovers of pleasure more
than lovers of God," remaining subject to their sensuousness. (2 Timothy 3:4)
Works which
are done
for 'righteousness' sake, "for the 'goodness' of mankind," remain
sensuous, subject to the flesh, of this world, whereas works which follow
from righteousness, follow from God's work of righteousness
imputed to man (imputed by Christ to those of faith in Him),
manifested by the working of the Holy Spirit in their lives (the redeemed, baptized
in water and in the Holy Spirit), while affecting the sensuous
(affect others, civil government, and the world)
remain righteous. Leave out the gospel (the wickedness and
deceitfulness of man's heart, the wrath of God upon "the children of
disobedience," i.e. the sensuous who are 'righteous' in their own eyes,
and the love, mercy, and grace of God upon those who repent of their sins before
Him) in the arena of public
service and all you have is the 'justification' of the system of
sensuousness (the liberation of Dopamine emancipation,
i.e. the 'driving purpose' of 'change," the "positive" environment
of 'change' liberating man from the "negative" environment
of unchanging truth, i.e. of the system of righteousness).
"Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels." Mark 8:38
When a nation is a nation with men of righteousness, men who fear and obey God (fear He who judges the soul, sending it to Heaven or Hell) and do not fear man (who can only kill the body), men who are not under the influence and control of sensuousness, anarchy, tyranny, and despotism (the depravity of man, i.e. the thief, the murderer, and the destroyer, i.e. abomination) is restrained. But when a nation is a nation of men of sensuousness, men who fear man (who fear those who can take away their access to gratifying objects which guarantee Dopamine emancipation, i.e. men controlled by the lust of the flesh, eyes, and pride of life, who live only for the pleasures of this life) and do not fear God (who judges the soul's of men), men who perceive righteousness as being irrational, irrelevant and therefore as anathema to life in the 'moment,' (thus are 'driven' with the 'purpose' of annihilating the system of righteousness), anarchy, tyranny, and despotism (the depravity of man, i.e. the thief, the murderer, and the destroyer, i.e. abomination) is emancipated. I have yet to meet a "contemporary" minister (Church Growth, emerging Church, etc. 'minister') who truly fears God and loves his word. They have refused to deny themselves, pick up their cross, and follow Jesus, having more concern about survival for themselves, i.e. "What is going to happen to me?" (although they say its not about I, me, or myself but about "us," i.e. society) and want the approval, respect, or praise of men (creating a Dopamine emancipation stimulating environment which they can ride upon, i.e. get a high on). Thus, as hirelings (exchanging God's righteousness with man's sensuousness, substituting God's word with man's opinions), they "feed their own bellies" (making a name for themselves) and "fleece the flock," using the bride of Christ for their own gain.
"Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people." Proverbs 14:34
The Beast in Man: “‘Have
you merely released the beast, the id, in man?’ There is no beast in
man. There is only man in man, and this we have been able to
release.” “The
innermost core of man’s nature, the base of his ‘animal nature,’ is
positive in nature.” “Do we dare to generalize from this type of
experience that if we cut through deeply enough to our organismic
nature, that we find that man is a positive and social animal? This is
the suggestion from our clinical experience.” “Maslow puts up a vigorous
case for man's animal nature . . . "
“In psychology, Freud and his followers have presented
convincing arguments that the id, man’s basic and unconscious
nature, is primarily made up of instincts which would, if permitted
expression, result in incest, murder, and other crimes.” “The whole
problem of therapy, as seen by this group, is how to hold these
untamed forces in check in a wholesome and constructive manner
[in the system of sensuousness],
rather than in the costly fashion of the neurotic [in the system of
righteousness].” (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
"So
it looks as if nudism is the first step toward ultimate
fee-animality-humanness. It's the easiest to take.
Must encourage it." "Yet nakedness is absolutely right. So
is the attack on antieroticism, the Christian & Jewish foundations. Must
move in the direction of the Reichian orgasm." "This movement can be dignified and
Apollonian & can avoid pornography & neurosis & ugliness.
I
must put as much of this as is possible & usable in my education book, &
more & more in succeeding writings." "Marxian theory needs
Freudian-type instinct theory to round it out. And of course, vice
versa." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version &
the humanistic. (Better add to definition of 'humanistic' that it also
means one species, One World.)"
(Abraham Maslow,
The
Journals of A.H. Maslow) "Sublimation
is essentially an attempt to relate the organic and superorganic levels
. . . To rediscover the animal in man. Sublimation involves the
desexualization of the aims of the sexual instinct. Psychoanalytic
therapy is to replace repression [the system of
righteousness] with sublimation [the system of
sensuousness]. If the psychoanalytical theory of
sublimation is rejected, psychoanalysis has nothing much to offer to the
science of culture." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death:
The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) bracketed information
added
As is the case in Fascism, Communism,
Socialism, Democratization, Conscietization, i.e. Democratic countries (all
dialectical, all of the systems of sensuousness and
reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation), we now live in a
land of sensuousness guided by
reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation (unrighteousness), where a righteous
man, in a court of sensuous,
reasoning:
seduced, deceived, and manipulated men,
can no
longer be judged by his peers, since
he has no peers, and therefore has no hope of justice but in the 'mercy' and
'grace' of God. This is the witness of the scriptures, from
Genesis to Revelation, from the garden in Eden to Armageddon, i.e. the
righteousness of God and the sensuousness of man―one
being truth (Spirit), the other (with the 'help' of Satan, i.e. the
'master facilitator'), seeking 'truth' via. his own wisdom (flesh),
given over to the love of sin, with
only a few hearing, fearing God and loving His Word, knowing the righteousness
which can only come from the
Son of God,
knowing and living in His righteousness (coming to know that the way,
the truth, and life is in Christ Jesus himself, i.e. having faith in God and His
Word and not in the 'wisdom' of men, repenting of their sins,
denying
themselves {which means taking care of the individual―negating survival of self} and picking up their cross {which
means taking
care of the social―negating approval of men}, believing in
and following after Christ {who is righteousness},
filled with the Holy Spirit and thereby able to obey the Heavenly Father's will,
living
not by the works of man but by the work of God,
i.e. saved from eternal damnation and inheriting eternal life).
"And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world. I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins." John 8:23-24 "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." Acts 4:12 "And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night. And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death." Revelation 12:9-11 (Read Revelation 16:1-21 and on to see the end of those who follow after Satan, i.e. the master facilitator, those who participate in his system of reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation, which Lucifer, the Devil, the great deceiver, introduced man to in the garden in Eden, Genesis 3:1-6.)
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber. But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep. To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out. And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice. And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.
Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep. All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers: but the sheep did not hear them. I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture. The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.
I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep. But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep. The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep. I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine." John 10:1-14
"For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things come from within, and defile the man." Matthew 7:21-23
Hate can only be overcome by the work of the Lord in
our heart. Man's nature is to hate that which prevents him from
attaining that which he believes he deserves (that being the
things of gratification of this world, be it even the respect of men,
i.e. for the sake of Dopamine emancipation, that being the fruit of "the
imagination of the heart," the very reason God flooded the world, Genesis 6:5; 8:21). All that man deserves
("'ought' to have")
is Hell, i.e. eternal damnation. This is why God's mercy and grace are
so wonderful (mercy being: not receiving from the Lord that which we
do deserve, that being eternal death, and grace being: receiving from the
Lord that which we do not deserve, that being eternal life).
But, according to Freud, hate is simply the byproduct of the Ego, the "death
instinct" working to liberate the "life instinct" of the Id, i.e.
pleasure, i.e. that which the person perceives himself as 'deserving,' i.e. that which man perceives
he "ought to have" (the "ought" of life, i.e. "I ought to be able to
..."). The "death instinct" is, according to Freud, the persons willingness to die
(in the act of taking someone else's life or taking his own life) for a
just (physically, mentally, and socially 'justified') cause, i.e. a willingness to die for pleasure
(one's own or others), when pleasure (or the hope of pleasure) is either
blocked
by a natural cause, i.e. no longer available from the given
environmental conditions, i.e. when sensuousness is only
available in the form of pain or not available at all, or is "repressed"
by an unnatural cause, i.e. when the system of sensuousness is
"repressed" by the system of righteousness.
In dialectical thought, when
hate, i.e. the "death instinct," is redirected to support an external,
not of nature, authority figure, i.e. when the person is forced by pain or threat of
pain to submit to the will of an authority higher than nature, the fear of higher authority (the fear of
judgment by higher authority for one's thoughts and one's actions which are
counter to, i.e. antithetical to their will) takes away ("suppresses") the
'fruit' of the Id, i.e. the pleasure of Eros, i.e. the sensation of being at-one-with
nature, i.e. the natural stimulator of Dopamine emancipation, and redirects it (the source of
pleasure) as coming not from Nature, but from one's obedience to a higher
authority than nature ("a substitute gratification"―Freud or "an
opiate"―Marx), i.e. submitting their will to the will of higher authority
which is not in harmony with or judgmental of nature,
thereby the "death instinct" i.e. hate, is also redirecting into
supporting that higher authorities will and its pleasures (perceived as being
spiritual, i.e. of the system of righteousness
"repressing" the system of sensuousness, making
sensuousness, i.e. the child or the adult, i.e. "the child within," subordinate to
righteousness, i.e. servants to the parent or God).
Apart from (void of) the
understanding which can only come from the Lord (which begins with the
fear of the Lord), man, limited by his "sense
perception" of the world he lives within, can only conclude this outcome. Hate is therefore perceived
as being directed against or used counter to one's own nature and Nature
itself (the unity of man to himself and the world), being directed and used in support of an anti-nature authority
(man serving and worshiping his creator, the creator of the universe),
i.e. an anti-democratic, anti-socialist, anti-one (anti at-one-with) world system authority,
directed and used against that
which the un-natural higher authority "hates" (used in support of that which
an not at-one-with, unnatural higher authority creates, uses, and
controls, i.e. for its own "unnatural" purposes, i.e. making
Nature subject to its not-in-harmony with nature will).
It is this
'logic' which overlooks (disregards) the law of nature itself, that men
and women are physically, mentally, and socially created for
the family, i.e. for procreation, and not just for self sensuality.
The dialectical idea that man (and the women) was created of, by, and for sensuality
'justifies' adultery, pornography, homosexuality, lesbianism, pedophilia,
bestiality, i.e. abomination. This wicked way of thinking,
which our nation (having rejected God as its foundation, and thus
rejected and turned against the system of righteousness), has placed its
trust in and is now guided by depraved men and women (a nation now
embracing and proactively promoting Diaprax, i.e. now 'driven' by the
system of sensuousness, guided by the system of
reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation, 'purposed'
in the annihilation of the system of righteousness all
around the world) is the same wicked way of thinking which the Apostle
Paul addressed in
Romans 1: 19-32 which began with man under the influence of the
first facilitator, counselor, psychiatrist, i.e. Satan, in the garden in
Eden, the woman being deceived and Adam following after her, Genesis
3:1-6. When the system of righteousness is negated
man can only find his identity within his "sensuous needs," "sense
perception," and "sense experiences" of the "cosmic forces"
of his mind (the wanting of gratifying objects of the creation).
He will hate anything or anyone who inhibits or blocks his 'quest' for
self-actualization, i.e. oneness with the world around him, i.e. nature.
"Discovering one’s real nature is simultaneously an ought quest and an is quest." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature) “Meaningful work comes very close to the religious quest in the humanistic sense.” [The] "goal is simply to build group companies where people can self-actualize.” (George McCown in Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management) "Salvation Is a By-Product of Self-Actualizing Work and Self-Actualizing Duty." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)
Thus dialectically, any inhibition or blocking of the 'right' for
self-actualization is considered an act (crime) against a person's right
to 'discover' his true identity. This 'natural right' is expressed
in childhood by the child's striking out against the parent when the
parent blocks or inhibits that which gives the child identity (and thus
unity) with the natural environment, the "striking out" identified as an
act of hate by the parent, but, according to Freud, actually an act of
love, i.e. the love for one's right to 'discover' their true identity.
The only problem in childhood being the child's inability to
annihilate or negate parental authority, i.e. neutralizing,
removing, or killing the parent, when they inhibit or block his quest of
'discovering' his 'true' natural (social) identity.
According to Freud, the
true 'purpose' of hate, i.e. the "death instinct," is to attack and
destroy higher authority itself when it inhibits or blocks the pleasure
instinct from being 'justly,' naturally emancipated, i.e.
annihilating any environmental condition which inhibits or blocks
Dopamine emancipation from doing its natural thing, uniting man with man
and man with nature itself, uniting man with that which comes "only from
Nature" (uniting man with that which only comes from the system of sensuousness). This is where Marx and Freud conjoin in
dialectical thought and action (philosophy and psychology, i.e.
dissatisfaction with the way things are under parents and God, put into
personal and social action, where public-private partnership is put into
action against the private, i.e. the conscience, which inhibits or
restrains that which is public, i.e. the super-ego, via the use of the
consensus, via. the dialectical process of 'changingness') in their attack upon the traditional
family, both, Marx, i.e. the public and Freud, i.e. the 'private,' now 'purposed' in
the negation of the system of
righteousness, one negating (shooting) the father figure and
the patriarchal family out of society, externally, the other negating
(counseling) the father figure and the patriarchal family out of the
individual, internally. Both ideologies now united (in
social-psychology) in the creation of a :new" world order, i.e. which is
not new―see Genesis
3:1-6.
Thus, when anyone makes hate, the "death instinct," subordinate to
that which is not in harmony with (not at-one-with) Nature they are
dialectically perceived as committing a "hate crime," i.e. committing a
crime against the proper use of hate, that being the negation of the
system of righteousness which restrains, i.e. inhibits or
blocks that which is natural, i.e. mimesis, impulse, etc. Hate is
of the heart 'driven' by the things of this world (sensuousness).
Unless the heart is changed by God (in His righteousness), it
remains a vessel of hate (lusting after sensuousness negating
righteousness), even when it is perceives as being 'good.'
The dialectical language of the heart is a language of hate against
righteousness, perceiving itself as being a language of love, i.e.
sensuousness, i.e. Dopamine emancipation, i.e. man's impulsive
'drive' to be at-one-with the world, i.e. mimesis,
"emancipating" him from the things antithetical to the world, i.e.
righteousness.
Human
"emancipation lies in fantasy and the language of experience
irreducible to linguistic rules: mimesis. . . . Marcuse thus could
write that ‘the realm of freedom lies beyond mimesis.’” (Stephen
Bronner, Of Critical Theory and Its Theorists)
“Universal Reconciliation relies on a reason that is before
reason-mimesis or ‘impulse.’” (Jürgen Habermas, The Theory of
Communicative Action) “Impulse, the primary fact, back of
which, psychically we cannot go.” (John Dewey, “Social
Psychology,” Psychological Review, I July, 1894)
Dialectically turning
good into evil and evil into good, by using hate in support
of annihilating anything, anyone, or any condition which
initiates and sustains that which is not of nature, annihilating that which is
of righteousness, annihilating the system of
righteousness, using hate in the defense of sensuousness,
i.e. that which is sensually perceived as 'good,'
turns hate (when it is used for the common good) into a praxis of "love." This is how the world
'justifies' the use of hate in initiating and sustaining world peace and
social harmony, labeling it as a praxis of "love," i.e.
mankind caring
for the future state of 'humanity.'
By reuniting hate and pleasure, with hate now being used in the defense
of pleasure, i.e. in support of Dopamine emancipation, i.e. in creating
a world of peace and social harmony, it is again
uniting (re-united) with its intended 'purpose,' that being the
emancipation, i.e. the liberation from righteousness (the Kingdom
of God) and the 'emergence,' of a society of
'pleasure,' which, according to dialectical thought, has always been
there from the beginning, only being contaminated (contained within and
used for the defense of the system of righteousness, i.e.
capitulation, i.e. capitalism) and was therefore
alienated against itself (un-united with and unable to unite with nature) due to the presence of the
system of righteousness (faith, belief, obedience, and
chastening). Therefore, if you don't chasten the Karl Marx
out of your children when they are young (chastening their Karl Marx
hand, when it strikes at you for take away what they want), they (the
Karl Marx in them) will annihilate you when you are old.
"Thus, for
instance, once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the
holy family, the former must itself be annihilated
[vernichtet]
theoretically and practically." (Karl Marx, Theses On Feuerbach #4)
In the "new" world order, hate, i.e. perceived as a crime (taking that which
is not yours to take), is not to be overcome, but is to be used to gain access to the individual, the
family, the neighborhood, and the state, to 'change' it (liberate it)
into a world of sensuousness, "love," i.e. Eros
(man at one with himself, others, and nature itself). Call
it Agape all you want, it is still Eros (just another name used, i.e.
misused, to gain access to the church). Unless the Lord
changes the heart, hate remains in the heart of man, keeping man a servant
to the sensuousness of his unregenerate heart, 'justified' in its use by man
for the 'purpose' of vanity and greed, i.e. for Dopamine
emancipation.
Making hate subject to a social cause and calling it love does not
change it into love, it remains what it is, hate against the Lord, His
will, and all that is His. Turning the church into an institution of
'enlightened ' Christians, i.e. sensuous and speculative
'Christians,' i.e. persecutors of believers, i.e.
persecuting those made righteous by the blood of the Lamb of God,
persecuting those who walk in His Holy Spirit, persecuting those who live in His system
of righteousness, persecuting
those who fear God and love His Word, persecuting those who remain faithful to His word
even to their own death (at the hands of those who 'believe' they are
helping God build His Kingdom). Any reading of
Hegel's works
(with understanding) will reveal this truth. Thus, the persecutors of believers
believe that what they are doing is the Lord's work (for the sake of the
Church and the Kingdom of God), i.e. perceiving
themselves as helping God build His Kingdom in the here-and-now (which
is actually their Kingdom).
Therefore, with their use of polls and surveys (finding out how people 'feel'
and what they 'thing') and their feasibility studies and their use of
the consensus process (the dialectical process of 'changingness') they believe they
are helping set
up the Kingdom of God, by building it through the works of their own flesh,
sight, and pride, persecuting (hating) any and all who inhibit or block their
way, any who stand in the way of the system of sensuousness,
which is of the world (marketing, "making customers," i.e. buying and
selling souls, for the advancement of 'the Kingdom of God').
"For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts." Isaiah 55:8, 9
God's Kingdom is different than man's Kingdom. God's Kingdom is built upon His own righteousness, His own Love, His own Joy, His own Peace, His own Truth, His own Life, and His own thoughts and His own way, now imputed to the believer, redeemed by the Blood of the Lamb, i.e. those who are no longer of this world, i.e. those who no longer are living and walking according to the system of sensuousness, i.e. those who are no longer lead by and made servants to the system of reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation. God's way (which is righteous and full of mercy and grace) is not man's way (which is sensuous and full of vanity and greed). Thus man's love (which is Phileo and Eros, of a system of sensuousness, of the world, of the flesh) is not God's love (which is Agape, of a patriarchal system of righteousness, of God, of the Spirit, and of His righteousness alone, i.e. imputed by Christ only, by the will of the Father only, and made evident in the believer by the power of the Holy Spirit only, all glory being from and going back to God). "Can God see His glory in you?" His glory can not come from you. Apart from Him, all you have is that 'righteousness' which is of the system of sensuousness which 'glories' in the things of this world. Your 'righteousness' is as a 'filthy rag,' good for nothing. "But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away." Isaiah 64:6 Your 'righteousness' can not buy your soul from Hell, it can not deliver you from God's judgment and eternal death. The dialectical process leaves all who fall under its sway condemned, i.e. seduced, deceived, and manipulated to remain in their own 'righteousness,' in their evil ways, believing themselves to be good.
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil." John 3:16-19
"He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal." John 12:25
"If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple." Luke 14:26, 27
"If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you." John 15:18
"As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in my love. If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love. These things have I spoken unto you, that my joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be full. This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you. Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you. Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you." John 15:9-15
Theory and Practice:
The phrase "theory and practice" is used throughout
the field of philosophy (and therefore in all fields coming out of it,
psychology, anthropology, theology, etc.). Philosophy (theory and
eventually the practice of it) finds its roots in a persons
dissatisfaction with current living conditions (environmental conditions
restraining the spontaneity of sensuousness seeking
'immediate' unity with the world, for the sake of continuous and
sustainable Dopamine emancipation).
When a person is not longer satisfied with the way things
are, that is, he finds himself in an environment of decreasing Dopamine
emancipation or is in an environment which is inhibiting or blocking
Dopamine emancipation (or is augmenting pain), he begins to react (and
eventually think, i.e. philosophy, on how) to 'change' that environment
in such a way that Dopamine emancipation will be restored, liberated,
and/or augmented. In his dissatisfaction (his no longer being
sensually satisfied) with the way things are, he becomes critical
(questioning) of the way things are, not only physically but mentally
and socially. For the child, this is manifested in his expression
of dissatisfaction with the parents restraining command, a command
telling the child that he can not do "his own thing," his continuing to
do "his own thing," then the parents removing of "his own thing," and
his natural reaction of reaching for "his own thing," and then its
removal from his environment by the parent of (his losing his control
over) "his own thing," and his striking at the parent for removing "his
own thing," with the parent then chastening him because of his
'critical' (disrespect/contempt toward authority) action (praxis)
against the parent for their restraining (inhibiting or blocking) him
from having access to and taking control over "his own thing" (desired
for the 'purpose' of Dopamine emancipation) which is now no longer
"their own thing." He is therefore taught (inculcated) that he
(his will) is subject to the parent's will, the parents way of doing
things (subject to the system of righteousness repressing
the system of sensuousness). Higher authority (and not the
environment and impulses) therefore
determines what is right and what is wrong behavior for the child, i.e.
controlling where access to Dopamine emancipation is to be attained,
i.e. via. the parents will . Right and wrong behavior is thus
based upon their "as given" rules and commands. His will is thus
subject to an un-natural environmental condition (objective truth),
restraining, inhibiting, or blocking Dopamine emancipation. His will is now subject to a higher
authority than nature itself. He is taught by his parents
that his will is no longer subject to his own way of doing things (his
will is no longer subject to the system of sensuousness
and spontaneity).
No longer is his own nature (its "as given" impulses and inclinations
toward Dopamine emancipation)
and his immediate, in the 'moment,' 'natural' environment (which
stimulated Dopamine emancipation) determining what is right and what is
wrong behavior (situation ethics, values clarification). His will is thus no longer subject to his
augmentation of the natural environment, which in turn augments the
stimulation of Dopamine emancipation, but rather his will is now subject
to that which is foreign to his own nature and nature itself (foreign to
his system of sensuousness), now restraining his carnal
nature.
Theory (philosophy) begins with a persons questioning
of the way things are (the questioning of the system of
righteousness). Theory is countering (and thus creating) the way
things 'ought' to be (of the system of sensuousness).
"How can I get 'my own thing' back again?" or "How can I 'change' the
current environment" (overcome the environment of restraint,
i.e. "the limitations imposed by the formal-logical law of
contradiction" by "circumventing,"
'changing,' or negating the system of righteousness
which is "imposing" its own righteous will upon my
sensuous will) "so that I can do
'my own thing,' 'have my own way,' be at-one-with the natural
environment?"
“By ‘dialectical’ I mean an activity of consciousness struggling to circumvent the limitations imposed by the formal-logical law of contradiction.” “Formal logic and the law of contradiction are the rules whereby the mind submits to operate under general conditions of repression.” (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)
While theory is to 'reflect' upon how things are and how
they 'ought' to be, it can not 'change' the way things are into how they
'ought' to be without being put into practice (praxis),
physically, mentally, and socially. The issue is then, "What is it
that needs to be approached and what is it that needs to be avoided (or
negated) for 'change' to take place?" "What is it that is relevant
and what is that is irrelevant to initiate and sustain 'change?'"
"What condition, situation, environment, process is necessary if 'change' (the
child) is to be liberated from restraint (the parent) and be put into
action (praxis), i.e. liberated from the system of
righteousness, physically, mentally, and socially. For
'change' (the "change process") to be initiated and sustained, all three
domains (physical, mental, and social) must come into harmony, become
one in 'purpose' and one in outcome, all three must be united in the
negation of the system of righteousness, physically,
mentally, and socially (cognitive, affective, and psycho-motor), if the
flesh, the mind, and human relationship are to be liberated from, i.e.
no longer subject to that which is not of nature, that which is
suppressing that which is of nature, restraining, i.e. inhibiting or
blocking, Dopamine emancipation. The catalyst for 'change' resides
in the "child within," within the persons sensual dissatisfaction with
parental and Godly restraint. Only within a social construct,
where the 'child within' is collectively united in 'cause,' i.e. united
in the cause (the common 'drive') of negating the system of righteousness,
can the system of righteousness be negated,
theoretically and practically, i.e. in the individual and in society,
united as one in the system of sensuousness, i.e. "free at
last, free at last, thank God all mighty we are free at last." It
is more than a social, economic, political, and/or race issue, it is a
sin issue, it is an issue of the heart, it is an issue of a man in sin,
i.e. you, standing before your creator, a good, pure, just, and Holy
God, giving account for your thoughts and actions, with your eternal
life or your eternal death in the balance. Only in Christ, his
righteousness imputed to you, providing that you believe upon
Him, will the scale go in the direction of eternal life.
Those of the system of
reasoning:
seduction, deception,
and manipulation want you to perceive it another way. They
want you to see 'life' and death according to the way of the system
of sensuousness, to see 'life' and death according to your flesh,
your eyes, and your pride of life (self-esteem), according to the way of
the world. Therefore 'life' is found not in
revelation from (or, according to Hegel, in "appearance void of essence,
untruth, delusion" found in the conception of) God ("a soul without
body," Hegel) but in revolution by man, in his revolution against
(emancipation from) God (beginning with parental authority), i.e. His righteousness, and the way of
God, i.e. the system of righteousness (found in the
traditional home). "The unity of visible existence and
conception, of body and soul, is the idea. It is not a mere
harmony of the two, but their complete interpenetration."
"In the practical [sensuous] sphere alone is reason constitutive. The
critique of reason is consequently not the knowing of objects, but of
knowledge and its principles, its range and limitations, so that it does
not become transcendent [of faith, belief, obedience and of the
system of righteousness]." (Hegel's Philosophy of Right) bracketed
information added
Revolution is thus mankind 'rationally' ('truth' in the 'moment,'
i.e. of sensuousness) freeing
himself from revelation (non-sensuous truth of restraint, i.e.
righteousness).
Jürgen Habermas
justified revolution, i.e. the creating of a "new" order of
the world―mankind
liberated from the system of righteousness,
theoretically and practically, in his every
thought and in his every action, in this way:
"Through the repression of needs and wishes, it translates this constraint
into a compulsion of internal nature, in other words into the constraint of
social norms. That is why the relative destruction of the moral relation can be
measured only by the difference between the actual degree of institutionally
demanded repression and the degree of repression that is necessary at a given
level of the forces of production. This difference is a measure of objectively
superfluous domination. It is those who establish such domination and defend
positions of power of this sort who set in motion the causality of fate, divide
society into social classes, suppress justified interests, call forth the
reactions of suppressed life, and finally experience their just fate in
revolution." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest. Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of
Knowledge as Social
Theory)
God declares it another way: "The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify
of it, that the works thereof are evil. If the world hate you, ye know that
it hated me before it hated you." John 7:7; 15:18 "Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and when they shall
separate you from their company, and shall reproach you, and cast out your
name as evil, for the Son of man's sake." Luke 6:22
Conclusion:
"Casting down
imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the
knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the
obedience of Christ;" 2 Corinthians 10:5 If man was created like all the other things of nature, "Let it
be," instead of "God breathing the breath into the nostrils of man and
man become a living soul," theory and practice would be right.
Theory
and practice is wrong because man is made in the image of God and not like the rest of
creation, i.e. he is able to evaluate (know) right from wrong in the
light of God's Word (having a conscience and a "living" soul). Theory and practice simply keeps
man condemned, bound to the flesh and the world, destined to judgment
and eternal death (unless he repents of his sins and give his life to
the Lord). No matter what man may do to justify himself before
himself, persecuting the righteous in his effort to 'redeem'
himself from God, i.e. futilely attempting to rescue himself from his creator, he can not
escape the consequence of his own thoughts and actions before a Holy
God. Without the revealed Word of God, His love for the world
expressed in His only begotten Son's love for His Father, in His
obedient to His Fathers every will, even to death, we are only bound to
the theory and practice of this life and human love (greed
and vanity). Only the righteous can find escape from the
theory and practice of this world, enduring its contempt
against the system of righteousness by remaining in the
love, the mercy, and the grace of God, i.e. in His word and in His
action, daily trusting, seeking, and hearing from him, letting
him direct us in our every thought and action. Otherwise the
"lawless" one rules in our lives in a false perception of
"lawfulness."
"Lawfulness without law" is mankind 'driven' by
lust (Dopamine emancipation), i.e. by
the lust of his flesh, the lust of his eyes, and his lust for the
approval of others (self-esteem), i.e. 'driven' by his lust for the
things of the world which stimulate Dopamine emancipation, 'purposed' in "having it 'his own way.'"
"Lawfulness without law" is mankind
void of understanding the consequences of his thoughts and actions
before a Holy God. Having rejecting the need for restraint by a
higher "law" than his own carnal nature, Godly restraint and the system of
righteousness have become irrelevant to his thoughts
and in his actions. Diaprax ("Lawfulness without law," i.e.
the lawless one ruling in man's thoughts and actions, individually and
socially) is a society of men 'driven' in "having it
"their own way,'" 'purposed' in forcing, through dialectical
reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation, its own carnal way upon all of
mankind, thinking all the while that it is doing so for the 'good' of
all mankind.
By bringing sensuousness into participation with
righteousness, promoting a 'gospel' of prosperity. By
making customers for the "kingdom of 'God,'" i.e. "kingdom of
men," instead of encouraging believers in their suffering for
righteousness sake (as Christ suffered) and enduring the rejection
of men (the shame of the cross). By rejecting righteousness
(God's word) when it interferes with 'growing' the 'church,' i.e.
mingling it with man's wisdom. The system of reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation, (through 'church
administration) was able to initiate and sustain 'change' as the only
way, the only truth, and the only life for the emerging of the
21'st century church. If the 'church' and the world are to become
one in 'drive' and in 'purpose,' then human relationship must
become the standard for determining 'righteousness,' instead of
the God and his Word, i.e. sound doctrine being the standard, causing
division, i.e. conflicting with the doctrines of men. Thus
the 'church,' having rejected that righteousness which can only
be found in Christ, has embraced the 'righteousness' of the world, and
is now united with the world in the negation of righteousness,
in the praxis of annihilating the righteous in
Christ, i.e. those who refuse to bend their knee and be 'reasonable' in
the 'light' of human "sensuous needs." You can pile all the
sheep skin you want to on those who use the dialectical process
for the winning of souls and the building of 'God's kingdom,' but, in
the end, anyone who uses the dialectical process of reasoning:
seduction, deception, and manipulation to 'grow' the
'church,' is just a wolf in sheep skin.
Everyone,
i.e. the individual and 'society,' must participate in the
dialectical process of 'changingness' if the system of
reasoning:
seduction, deception,
and manipulation is to be 'successful' in creating the "new"
world order of abomination (Dopamine emancipation for the 'All,'
void of the restraints of the system of righteousness).
Everyone, i.e. the individual (and society), is therefore guilty
until 'proven' innocent. Guilty of
having the system of righteousness until he (it) has been
made innocent (re-educated), i.e.
'purged' of the system of righteousness, by his (its)
'willful' participation within (and willful' promotion of) the system of
reasoning:
seduction,
deception, and manipulation, i.e. all are 'driven' by the system of
sensuousness, all are 'purposed' in initiating and sustaining
Dopamine emancipation for the all (society)―physically,
mentally, and socially―all are
'purposed' in the negation the system of righteousness,
in the "negation of negation," i.e. the negation of man's
estrangement with himself and with nature).
To initiate "doing his own thing 'his own way,'"
mankind must be 'helped' (facilitated) in negating the system
of righteousness within himself (in his relationship with
himself, in his own thoughts). To sustain "doing his own
thing 'his own way,'" he must then be re-educated (programmed) in
the praxis of annihilating the
system of righteousness outside of himself (in his relations
with others; having "purposiveness without purpose,"
having a sensation of purpose without God having sent him,
i.e. substituting the preaching and teaching of righteousness
with the dialoguing of sensuousness).
If mankind (the individual and society) does not practice
the theory (the opinions of men) then the system of righteousness remains
within the conscience of the individual and within the habits (customs)
of the family, city, country, and the world, restraining, i.e.
inhibiting and blocking the system of sensuousness,
thus preventing the the system of
reasoning:
seduction, deception, and
manipulation from having it (the world) "its own way," i.e.
creating the "new" world order of abomination in every man's
thoughts and in in every man's practice for its own 'purpose,' i.e.
Dopamine emancipation for all (a collective orgy; bacchanalia). Diaprax makes every man a slave to his own
flesh (his lust for and the intoxication of Dopamine emancipation, i.e.
pleasure) and thus makes all mankind a
slave to the "new" world order of "lawfulness without law."
In the end (as begun in the Garden in Eden;
Genesis 3:1-6)
the dialectical process of 'changingness,' when put into praxis, makes all men who
participate, servants to their master, the "abomination of
desecration," Satan, the great deceiver of men, the master
facilitator of 'change' (the Antichrist; a user friendly, non-offensive,
readily adaptable to change, marketable 'Christ', made in the image of
sensuous man, i.e. void of and anathema to the system of
righteousness). For
example:
Social Security, Medicaid,
and Medicare, etc., the perception that society cares about you and will
take care of you, is a false security. Nobody will take care of
you (attend to your needs) like the patriarchal traditional family (your
loved ones of the system of righteousness). No
matter the technology at their disposal, those of the system of
sensuousness, 'guided' by those of the system of
reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation ('human resources' and
'management') will base the amount of attending, i.e. how far they will
attend to your needs, upon what they (and society) can get from you, i.e.
Dopamine emancipation (in the form of physical, mental, and social
worth, i.e. money, i.e. stored up drug money, i.e. potential
Dopamine emancipation). Now that the patriarchal family (of the system
of righteousness) is negated "in theory and in practice,"
the only hope for the unborn and the elderly (and all of mankind) is in
the mercy and grace of God alone, where it has always been anyway.
Only those who place their trust in the Lord can have hope of eternal
life, finding refuge from those who put their trust in man, men
foolishly hoping in the world systems of sensuousness,
reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation, and death. After all is
said and done, it is a bloody system (the buying and selling of souls is
a bloody system). As long as everybody is happy, i.e. life is in
the here-and-now, and the bloodletting is perceived as being somewhere
else, or necessary, or out of sight, then all can march down the pathway
of death, living in pleasure, not cognizant of what lies ahead, waiting
for them.
"Not that I speak in respect of want: for I have learned, in whatsoever state I am, therewith to be content." Philippians 4:11 "And having food and raiment let us be therewith content." 1 Timothy 6:8 "Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee." Hebrews 13:5 Put your trust in the Lord (trusting in the Lord with all your heart) and not in man and this world. You are cursed when you trust in man, leaning to your own understanding―directed by human 'reasoning,' 'driven' by the "spiraling process of 'changingness'" ("dissatisfaction"). Being born into sin, subject to its nature, you are confined to its betrayal (and judgment) in the end. In all your ways (in all that you think, say, and do) acknowledge the Lord, i.e. acknowledge His work, i.e. His work in you, and love not your life in this world unto the death. Let the Lord (in His righteousness which is imputed unto all who believe upon him) direct your steps as you live, walk, and have your being in God's system of righteousness (no longer being subject to this world, taken captive by its systems of sensuousness and reasoning: seduction, deception, and manipulation). Where you spend eternity depends upon it.
"But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned." Matthew 12:36, 37
"Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin; That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God. For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries: Wherein they think it strange that ye run not with them to the same excess of riot, speaking evil of you: Who shall give account to him that is ready to judge the quick and the dead." 1 Peter 4:1-5
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2010 - 2011